“Voodoo Doll”: Implications and Offense of a Taxonomic Category

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2020-08-08 DOI:10.1353/are.2020.0001
D. Frankfurter
{"title":"“Voodoo Doll”: Implications and Offense of a Taxonomic Category","authors":"D. Frankfurter","doi":"10.1353/are.2020.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper focuses on the persistent use of a particular term, “Voodoo Doll,” to classify certain artifacts and argues that it is both fundamentally misleading in its history of applications and especially egregious in the current debate over the openness of classics to people of color. Voodoo Doll not only exploits caricatures of Afro-Caribbean religion, it maintains a fundamental error in the interpretation of ancient ritual figurines: that is, the assumption of a primitive “law of sympathy.” This paper reviews current scholarship on ancient ritual figurines and then discusses the category Voodoo Doll and its modern origins, with an argument for its abandonment.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"53 1","pages":"43 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/are.2020.0001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2020.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This paper focuses on the persistent use of a particular term, “Voodoo Doll,” to classify certain artifacts and argues that it is both fundamentally misleading in its history of applications and especially egregious in the current debate over the openness of classics to people of color. Voodoo Doll not only exploits caricatures of Afro-Caribbean religion, it maintains a fundamental error in the interpretation of ancient ritual figurines: that is, the assumption of a primitive “law of sympathy.” This paper reviews current scholarship on ancient ritual figurines and then discusses the category Voodoo Doll and its modern origins, with an argument for its abandonment.
“巫毒娃娃”:一个分类范畴的含义和罪行
摘要:本文关注的是“巫毒娃娃”这个特定术语在对某些文物进行分类时的持续使用,并认为它在其应用史上具有根本误导性,在当前关于经典向有色人种开放的辩论中尤其令人震惊。Voodoo Doll不仅利用了非裔加勒比宗教的漫画,而且在对古代仪式雕像的解释中也存在一个根本错误:即对原始“同情法则”的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信