Quality matters: immunotherapy and the evolving landscape of advanced cancer care

Satya Das, L. Horn
{"title":"Quality matters: immunotherapy and the evolving landscape of advanced cancer care","authors":"Satya Das, L. Horn","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2017.1381563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Immunotherapy has been FDA approved in several first line and many more second line settings in patients with advanced cancer. While only a subset of patients derive benefit from checkpoint blockade, the potential for durable responses and tolerable adverse effects make it an appealing option. Patient quality of life on the therapy is a particularly important consideration given its therapeutic intent is non-curative. Areas covered: The primary focus of this review is exploring studies which led to the approval of checkpoint inhibitors in a variety of tumor types, with a specific emphasis on studies looking at patient related outcomes (PRO). The latter part of the review focuses on identification and management of unique immune related toxicities. Expert commentary: PROs are improved with immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy largely by reducing functional decline and impacting global health less negatively in patients. There remain numerous questions about checkpoint inhibitors including what is the optimal duration of treatment, will they be tolerable when combined with immune stimulatory agonists or chemotherapy, and how do we increase the number of patients who derive benefit from them. We are only beginning to scratch the surface of their potential.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"2 1","pages":"235 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2017.1381563","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2017.1381563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Immunotherapy has been FDA approved in several first line and many more second line settings in patients with advanced cancer. While only a subset of patients derive benefit from checkpoint blockade, the potential for durable responses and tolerable adverse effects make it an appealing option. Patient quality of life on the therapy is a particularly important consideration given its therapeutic intent is non-curative. Areas covered: The primary focus of this review is exploring studies which led to the approval of checkpoint inhibitors in a variety of tumor types, with a specific emphasis on studies looking at patient related outcomes (PRO). The latter part of the review focuses on identification and management of unique immune related toxicities. Expert commentary: PROs are improved with immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy largely by reducing functional decline and impacting global health less negatively in patients. There remain numerous questions about checkpoint inhibitors including what is the optimal duration of treatment, will they be tolerable when combined with immune stimulatory agonists or chemotherapy, and how do we increase the number of patients who derive benefit from them. We are only beginning to scratch the surface of their potential.
质量问题:免疫疗法和晚期癌症治疗的发展前景
摘要简介:免疫疗法已被FDA批准用于晚期癌症患者的多个一线和更多二线治疗。虽然只有一小部分患者从检查点阻断中获益,但持久反应和可耐受的不良反应的潜力使其成为一种有吸引力的选择。患者的生活质量是一个特别重要的考虑因素,因为它的治疗意图是非治疗性的。涵盖领域:本综述的主要重点是探索导致在各种肿瘤类型中批准检查点抑制剂的研究,特别强调关注患者相关结果(PRO)的研究。综述的后半部分侧重于识别和管理独特的免疫相关毒性。专家评论:与化疗相比,免疫疗法在很大程度上减少了患者的功能下降,减少了对全球健康的负面影响,从而改善了PROs。关于检查点抑制剂,仍然存在许多问题,包括最佳治疗持续时间是什么,与免疫刺激激动剂或化疗联合使用时它们是否可以耐受,以及我们如何增加从中受益的患者数量。我们才刚刚开始触及他们潜力的表面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信