Healthcare Advocacy And Moral Distress In The Practice Of Nurses

Aline Marcelino Ramos, E. Barlem, Jamila Geri Tomaschewski Barlem, Laurelize Pereira Rocha, R. D. S. Silveira, Liliane Alves Pereira
{"title":"Healthcare Advocacy And Moral Distress In The Practice Of Nurses","authors":"Aline Marcelino Ramos, E. Barlem, Jamila Geri Tomaschewski Barlem, Laurelize Pereira Rocha, R. D. S. Silveira, Liliane Alves Pereira","doi":"10.3823/2578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: By focusing in prioritizing patients and their rights, occasional limitations may arise and prevent nurses from doing their work according to their social and professional commitment. This may culminate in Moral Distress, resulting from the incoherence between the nurses' actions and their personal convictions. \nResearch question: Is there any relationship between healthcare advocacy and moral distress in the practice of nurses working in hospitals? \nObjective: Analyzing the relation between healthcare advocacy and moral distress in the practice of nurses working in hospitals. \nResearch design: Quantitative, analytical cross-sectional study. The data collection instruments comprise the Moral Distress Scale Revised – Brazilian version and the Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale – Brazilian version. Data analysis was carried out with elements of descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis. \nParticipants and research context: The participants comprised 157 nurses working in two hospitals located in a city in southern Brazil. One of the institutions is a public university hospital and the other is a philanthropic institution. \nEthical considerations: All the international directives for research with human beings were observed. \nFindings: The constructs barriers to the advocacy practice and negative implications to the advocacy practice were pointed out as predictors of moral distress.   \nDiscussion: The situations approached in this study illustrate that certain organizational and cultural contexts have negative impacts on nurses, who are in constant contact with the necessity of promoting patient well being and increasing access to healthcare, especially under the perception of vulnerability in risk situations, or when the quality of the services provided decreases and patients are not given adequate assistance. \nConclusion: We hope that this study encourages the reflection about the relationship between patient advocacy and moral distress, and the search for resources that may contribute to the quality of the assistance provided by nurses.","PeriodicalId":73409,"journal":{"name":"International archives of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International archives of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3823/2578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: By focusing in prioritizing patients and their rights, occasional limitations may arise and prevent nurses from doing their work according to their social and professional commitment. This may culminate in Moral Distress, resulting from the incoherence between the nurses' actions and their personal convictions. Research question: Is there any relationship between healthcare advocacy and moral distress in the practice of nurses working in hospitals? Objective: Analyzing the relation between healthcare advocacy and moral distress in the practice of nurses working in hospitals. Research design: Quantitative, analytical cross-sectional study. The data collection instruments comprise the Moral Distress Scale Revised – Brazilian version and the Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale – Brazilian version. Data analysis was carried out with elements of descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis. Participants and research context: The participants comprised 157 nurses working in two hospitals located in a city in southern Brazil. One of the institutions is a public university hospital and the other is a philanthropic institution. Ethical considerations: All the international directives for research with human beings were observed. Findings: The constructs barriers to the advocacy practice and negative implications to the advocacy practice were pointed out as predictors of moral distress.   Discussion: The situations approached in this study illustrate that certain organizational and cultural contexts have negative impacts on nurses, who are in constant contact with the necessity of promoting patient well being and increasing access to healthcare, especially under the perception of vulnerability in risk situations, or when the quality of the services provided decreases and patients are not given adequate assistance. Conclusion: We hope that this study encourages the reflection about the relationship between patient advocacy and moral distress, and the search for resources that may contribute to the quality of the assistance provided by nurses.
护理实践中的医疗倡导与道德困境
背景:通过专注于优先考虑患者及其权利,可能会偶尔出现限制,并阻止护士根据其社会和专业承诺开展工作。这可能会导致护士的行为和个人信念之间的不一致,从而导致道德困境。研究问题:在医院工作的护士实践中,医疗保健倡导和道德困境之间有任何关系吗?目的:分析医院护士实践中的健康倡导与道德困境的关系。研究设计:定量、分析的横断面研究。数据收集工具包括巴西版修订的道德痛苦量表和巴西版保护性护理倡导量表。数据分析采用描述性统计、皮尔逊相关和线性回归分析。参与者和研究背景:参与者包括157名护士,他们在巴西南部一座城市的两家医院工作。其中一个机构是公立大学医院,另一个是慈善机构。伦理考虑:所有关于人类研究的国际指令都得到了遵守。研究结果:倡导实践的结构障碍和对倡导实践的负面影响被指出是道德困境的预测因素。讨论:本研究中涉及的情况表明,某些组织和文化背景对护士有负面影响,他们经常接触到促进患者健康和增加获得医疗保健的必要性,特别是在风险情况下的脆弱性,或者当所提供的服务质量下降并且患者没有得到足够的帮助时。结论:我们希望这项研究能鼓励人们反思患者权益和道德困境之间的关系,并寻找有助于提高护士援助质量的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信