“The Scope of Mine Intent”: Reading for the Author in George Gascoigne’s Hundreth Sundrie Flowres and Posies

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Douglas S. Pfeiffer
{"title":"“The Scope of Mine Intent”: Reading for the Author in George Gascoigne’s Hundreth Sundrie Flowres and Posies","authors":"Douglas S. Pfeiffer","doi":"10.1086/724357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One way we read now—linking a book to its author’s character or life story—while long assumed to originate in the Romantic era, emerges much earlier, in Renaissance philological practice, with roots reaching back to ancient rhetorical and grammatical theory. This biographical stance, first refined into critical method by humanist editors exploring the interpretive application of ancient authors’ personal histories, eventually finds literary use by early modern poets themselves. George Gascoigne, the most enterprising and versatile figure among England’s first generation of would-be professional poets in the vernacular, cannot pass up the opportunity to profit by the hermeneutic promise of this author-centric technique of reading. At every turn in his playful poetry collections of 1573 and 1575, Gascoigne invites speculation about (mostly his own) authorship to provoke—and frustrate and redirect—the reader’s textual experience. This essay explores the central role of Gascoigne’s self-referential rhetoric, particularly in the prefatory letters to the two collections, where, to promote his writings and career, Gascoigne works to establish the fiction of a governing ethical design for each collection. More broadly, Gascoigne’s example affords us a glimpse of the underacknowledged richness of life writing’s interpretive valence in early modern practice. [D.P.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One way we read now—linking a book to its author’s character or life story—while long assumed to originate in the Romantic era, emerges much earlier, in Renaissance philological practice, with roots reaching back to ancient rhetorical and grammatical theory. This biographical stance, first refined into critical method by humanist editors exploring the interpretive application of ancient authors’ personal histories, eventually finds literary use by early modern poets themselves. George Gascoigne, the most enterprising and versatile figure among England’s first generation of would-be professional poets in the vernacular, cannot pass up the opportunity to profit by the hermeneutic promise of this author-centric technique of reading. At every turn in his playful poetry collections of 1573 and 1575, Gascoigne invites speculation about (mostly his own) authorship to provoke—and frustrate and redirect—the reader’s textual experience. This essay explores the central role of Gascoigne’s self-referential rhetoric, particularly in the prefatory letters to the two collections, where, to promote his writings and career, Gascoigne works to establish the fiction of a governing ethical design for each collection. More broadly, Gascoigne’s example affords us a glimpse of the underacknowledged richness of life writing’s interpretive valence in early modern practice. [D.P.]
“我意图的范围”:乔治·加斯科因《百日花束》作者解读
我们现在的一种阅读方式——将一本书与作者的性格或生活故事联系起来——虽然长期以来被认为起源于浪漫主义时代,但在文艺复兴时期的语言学实践中出现得更早,其根源可以追溯到古代的修辞和语法理论。这种传记式的立场,首先被人文主义编辑提炼为批判方法,探索古代作者个人历史的解释应用,最终为早期现代诗人自己找到了文学用途。乔治·加斯科因(George Gascoigne)是英国第一代想成为白话专业诗人的人中最具进取心和最多才多艺的人物,他不能错过从这种以作者为中心的阅读技巧的解释学承诺中获利的机会。在加斯科因1573年和1575年诙谐的诗集的每一个转折中,他都邀请人们猜测(主要是他自己)作者的身份,以激发、挫败和重新引导读者的文本体验。本文探讨了加斯科因自我指涉修辞的核心作用,特别是在两个文集的序言信中,为了促进他的写作和事业,加斯科因致力于为每个文集建立一个统治道德设计的小说。更广泛地说,加斯科因的例子让我们瞥见了早期现代实践中未被承认的生活写作的解释价的丰富性。(聚合度)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信