Apollonius Rhodius 1.103: A Discussion of a New Emendation

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
S. Bär
{"title":"Apollonius Rhodius 1.103: A Discussion of a New Emendation","authors":"S. Bär","doi":"10.1080/00397679.2021.1979326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Apoll. Rhod. Arg. 1.103, there are three textual variants for the adjective that accompanies the noun ὁδόν: κοινήν, κϵινήν and κϵίνην. Recently, the emendation σκοτίην has been suggested; a suggestion that is seemingly supported by a parallel in Arg. Orph. 41. It is argued here that this emendation is unwarranted and that probably either κϵινήν or κϵίνην is authentic, whereby the two variants constitute wordplay that reinforces the ironic underlayer of the context. Further, it is demonstrated that Arg. Orph. 41 does not provide a convincing parallel and that it thus does not support the suggested emendation.","PeriodicalId":41733,"journal":{"name":"Symbolae Osloenses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symbolae Osloenses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00397679.2021.1979326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Apoll. Rhod. Arg. 1.103, there are three textual variants for the adjective that accompanies the noun ὁδόν: κοινήν, κϵινήν and κϵίνην. Recently, the emendation σκοτίην has been suggested; a suggestion that is seemingly supported by a parallel in Arg. Orph. 41. It is argued here that this emendation is unwarranted and that probably either κϵινήν or κϵίνην is authentic, whereby the two variants constitute wordplay that reinforces the ironic underlayer of the context. Further, it is demonstrated that Arg. Orph. 41 does not provide a convincing parallel and that it thus does not support the suggested emendation.
Apolonius Rhodius 1.103:一个新的灭绝论
在Apoll。罗。Arg。1.103,伴随名词的形容词有三种语篇变体ὁδόν: κιήν、 κειήε和κίμη。最近,对σκί提出了ηη;这一建议似乎得到了Arg中一个平行词的支持。孤儿。41.这里有人认为,这种修正是没有根据的,可能是κήείη是真实的,因此这两个变体构成了强化上下文讽刺底层的文字游戏。进一步证明了Arg。孤儿。41没有提供一个令人信服的类比,因此它不支持所建议的修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Symbolae Osloenses
Symbolae Osloenses CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信