A Review on Tactile Displays for Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery

Surgeries Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.3390/surgeries3040036
Jacinto Colan, Ana Davila, Y. Hasegawa
{"title":"A Review on Tactile Displays for Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery","authors":"Jacinto Colan, Ana Davila, Y. Hasegawa","doi":"10.3390/surgeries3040036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is a minimally invasive technique that offers many advantages over traditional open surgery: it reduces trauma, scarring, and shortens recovery time. However, an important limitation is the loss of tactile sensations. Although some progress has been made in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) setups, RMIS is still not widely accessible. This review aims to identify which tactile display technologies have been proposed and experimentally validated for the restoration of tactile sensations during conventional laparoscopic surgical tasks. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified relevant articles published over the past 10 years through a search on Web of science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital, and PubMed repositories. A total of 143 articles met the inclusion criteria and 24 were included in the final review. From the reviewed articles, we classified the proposed tactile displays into two categories based on the use of skin contact: (i) skin tactile displays, which include vibrotactile, skin-indentation, and grip-feedback devices, and (ii) non-contact tactile displays based on visualization tools. This survey aims to contribute to further research in the area of tactile displays for laparoscopic surgery by providing a better understanding of the current state of the art and identifying the remaining challenges.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is a minimally invasive technique that offers many advantages over traditional open surgery: it reduces trauma, scarring, and shortens recovery time. However, an important limitation is the loss of tactile sensations. Although some progress has been made in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) setups, RMIS is still not widely accessible. This review aims to identify which tactile display technologies have been proposed and experimentally validated for the restoration of tactile sensations during conventional laparoscopic surgical tasks. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified relevant articles published over the past 10 years through a search on Web of science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital, and PubMed repositories. A total of 143 articles met the inclusion criteria and 24 were included in the final review. From the reviewed articles, we classified the proposed tactile displays into two categories based on the use of skin contact: (i) skin tactile displays, which include vibrotactile, skin-indentation, and grip-feedback devices, and (ii) non-contact tactile displays based on visualization tools. This survey aims to contribute to further research in the area of tactile displays for laparoscopic surgery by providing a better understanding of the current state of the art and identifying the remaining challenges.
传统腹腔镜手术触觉显示技术综述
腹腔镜手术(LS)是一种微创技术,与传统的开放手术相比,它提供了许多优点:它减少了创伤,疤痕,缩短了恢复时间。然而,一个重要的限制是触觉的丧失。尽管在机器人辅助微创手术(RMIS)装置方面取得了一些进展,但RMIS仍然没有广泛使用。这篇综述的目的是确定哪些触觉显示技术已经提出和实验验证的触觉恢复在传统腹腔镜手术任务。我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统评价。我们通过搜索Web of science、Scopus、IEEE explore Digital和PubMed知识库,确定了过去10年发表的相关文章。共有143篇文章符合纳入标准,其中24篇被纳入最终审查。从所回顾的文章中,我们根据皮肤接触的使用将拟议的触觉显示分为两类:(i)皮肤触觉显示,包括振动触觉,皮肤压痕和抓握反馈设备;(ii)基于可视化工具的非接触式触觉显示。本调查旨在通过更好地了解目前的技术状况和确定剩余的挑战,为腹腔镜手术触觉显示领域的进一步研究做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信