Holiday planning in Indian families: a dual path model linking family type and conflict resolution

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Rashmi Singh, L. K. Jena
{"title":"Holiday planning in Indian families: a dual path model linking family type and conflict resolution","authors":"Rashmi Singh, L. K. Jena","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-09-2022-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the effect of parent–adolescent conflict in step versus biological families on family communication patterns (FCPs) and the conflict resolution strategy adopted by adolescents during family destinations or holiday planning (where to visit?).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe literature on family conflict (i.e. parent–adolescent conflict) and the different types of families (step vs nuclear) supported the proposed framework. The survey was conducted in the Indian subcontinent with a sample size of 437 adolescents. SPSS 22.0 was used for factor analysis (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis) and structural equation modelling was used through AMOS 26.0 for data analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nSignificant relationship was observed between the types of families (step and biological), FCP and the resolution strategy chosen by Indian adolescents. Adopting a resolution strategy by adolescents in both families depends on the type of FCP in the family. Adolescents in stepfamilies have socio-oriented FCP and use “positive problem-solving” and “conflict withdrawal” as a resolution strategy. In contrast, adolescents in biological families have concept-oriented families and use “conflict enhancement” as a resolution strategy. It has also been found that adolescents who fall into high-stress categories used conflict enhancement strategies. In contrast, those who fall under low-stress categories used positive problem-solving and withdrawal strategies.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study will add a new chapter to adolescents’ decision-making literature in line with the previous research. It has practical implications for tourism marketers, academicians/researchers and policymakers. Marketers can segment adolescents into step versus biological families, and the choice of resolution strategies may introduce efficient and competent marketing strategies and promotional campaigns.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study favours that family type is a robust construct to predict adolescents’ choice of resolution strategy. So, it is one of the most influential variables in adolescents’ resolution strategy adoption.\n","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-09-2022-0146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect of parent–adolescent conflict in step versus biological families on family communication patterns (FCPs) and the conflict resolution strategy adopted by adolescents during family destinations or holiday planning (where to visit?). Design/methodology/approach The literature on family conflict (i.e. parent–adolescent conflict) and the different types of families (step vs nuclear) supported the proposed framework. The survey was conducted in the Indian subcontinent with a sample size of 437 adolescents. SPSS 22.0 was used for factor analysis (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis) and structural equation modelling was used through AMOS 26.0 for data analysis. Findings Significant relationship was observed between the types of families (step and biological), FCP and the resolution strategy chosen by Indian adolescents. Adopting a resolution strategy by adolescents in both families depends on the type of FCP in the family. Adolescents in stepfamilies have socio-oriented FCP and use “positive problem-solving” and “conflict withdrawal” as a resolution strategy. In contrast, adolescents in biological families have concept-oriented families and use “conflict enhancement” as a resolution strategy. It has also been found that adolescents who fall into high-stress categories used conflict enhancement strategies. In contrast, those who fall under low-stress categories used positive problem-solving and withdrawal strategies. Practical implications This study will add a new chapter to adolescents’ decision-making literature in line with the previous research. It has practical implications for tourism marketers, academicians/researchers and policymakers. Marketers can segment adolescents into step versus biological families, and the choice of resolution strategies may introduce efficient and competent marketing strategies and promotional campaigns. Originality/value This study favours that family type is a robust construct to predict adolescents’ choice of resolution strategy. So, it is one of the most influential variables in adolescents’ resolution strategy adoption.
印度家庭度假计划:一个连接家庭类型和冲突解决的双路径模型
目的本论文旨在调查步进家庭与亲生家庭中的父母-青少年冲突对家庭沟通模式(FCPs)的影响,以及青少年在家庭目的地或度假计划(去哪里?)期间所采取的冲突解决策略家庭类型(step与nuclear)支持所提出的框架。这项调查是在印度次大陆进行的,样本量为437名青少年。SPSS 22.0用于因子分析(探索性和验证性因子分析),通过AMOS 26.0使用结构方程模型进行数据分析。发现印度青少年选择的家庭类型(继代和生物学)、FCP和解决策略之间存在显著关系。两个家庭的青少年采取解决策略取决于家庭中FCP的类型。继家庭中的青少年有面向社会的FCP,并使用“积极解决问题”和“冲突回避”作为解决策略。相比之下,生理家庭中的青少年有以概念为导向的家庭,并将“加强冲突”作为解决策略。研究还发现,属于高压力类别的青少年使用了增强冲突的策略。相比之下,那些属于低压力类别的人使用了积极的解决问题和退缩策略。实践意义本研究将与以往的研究相一致,为青少年决策文献增添新的篇章。它对旅游营销人员、学者/研究人员和政策制定者具有实际意义。营销人员可以将青少年分为跨性别家庭和亲生家庭,选择解决策略可能会引入有效和称职的营销策略和促销活动。独创性/价值本研究认为,家庭类型是预测青少年解决策略选择的一个强有力的结构。因此,它是影响青少年解决策略采用的最具影响力的变量之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信