Cognitive and personality predictors of trait resilience in young people with psychosis proneness: an exploratory study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Dagmara Mętel, A. Cechnicki, Aleksandra Arciszewska-Leszczuk, Renata Pionke-Ubych, Martyna Krężołek, P. Błądziński, D. Frydecka, Ł. Gawęda
{"title":"Cognitive and personality predictors of trait resilience in young people with psychosis proneness: an exploratory study","authors":"Dagmara Mętel, A. Cechnicki, Aleksandra Arciszewska-Leszczuk, Renata Pionke-Ubych, Martyna Krężołek, P. Błądziński, D. Frydecka, Ł. Gawęda","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2021.1945664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Resilience has been increasingly recognized as a relevant area of research and clinical intervention in mental health. Although resilience is considered a putative protective factor against psychopathology development, its role in psychosis continuum disorders has been less frequently recognized. Aims To examine neurocognitive and personality underpinnings of resilience in individuals prone to psychosis. Methods 92 young adults were assessed with the battery of cognitive tests, TCI, CES-D, CAARMS, PQ-16, and CD-RISC-10. Linear regression was conducted to check, if resilience predicted the level of psychopathology. Correlational analysis was conducted to verify the relationships of resilience with neurocognitive and personality measures. A hierarchical multiple regression model was built to explain the predictors of resilience. Results Lower resilience predicted higher severity of the total CAARMS score, but was not related to positive symptoms. Cognition, personality, and depressive symptoms affected resilience. The strongest predictor of resilience was the severity of depressive symptoms. Discussion Interventions buffering resilience for psychosis-prone individuals should include therapeutic work on ego-strength and tasks mastering cognitive flexibility.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17522439.2021.1945664","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2021.1945664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Resilience has been increasingly recognized as a relevant area of research and clinical intervention in mental health. Although resilience is considered a putative protective factor against psychopathology development, its role in psychosis continuum disorders has been less frequently recognized. Aims To examine neurocognitive and personality underpinnings of resilience in individuals prone to psychosis. Methods 92 young adults were assessed with the battery of cognitive tests, TCI, CES-D, CAARMS, PQ-16, and CD-RISC-10. Linear regression was conducted to check, if resilience predicted the level of psychopathology. Correlational analysis was conducted to verify the relationships of resilience with neurocognitive and personality measures. A hierarchical multiple regression model was built to explain the predictors of resilience. Results Lower resilience predicted higher severity of the total CAARMS score, but was not related to positive symptoms. Cognition, personality, and depressive symptoms affected resilience. The strongest predictor of resilience was the severity of depressive symptoms. Discussion Interventions buffering resilience for psychosis-prone individuals should include therapeutic work on ego-strength and tasks mastering cognitive flexibility.
青少年精神病倾向特质弹性的认知及人格预测因素:一项探索性研究
心理弹性作为心理健康研究和临床干预的一个相关领域,已得到越来越多的认可。虽然心理弹性被认为是防止精神病理发展的一种假定的保护因素,但它在精神病连续障碍中的作用却很少被认识到。目的探讨精神病患者心理弹性的神经认知和人格基础。方法采用认知测试、TCI、CES-D、CAARMS、PQ-16和CD-RISC-10对92名青年进行评估。采用线性回归检验心理弹性是否能预测心理病理水平。通过相关分析验证心理弹性与神经认知和人格测量的关系。建立了层次多元回归模型来解释心理弹性的影响因素。结果心理韧性较低预示着CAARMS总分的严重程度较高,但与阳性症状无关。认知、个性和抑郁症状影响恢复力。对复原力最强的预测因子是抑郁症状的严重程度。干预措施缓冲精神病易感个体的恢复力应包括对自我力量和掌握认知灵活性任务的治疗工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信