Do different dimensions of corporate social responsibility disclosure have different economic consequence: multi-approaches for profitability examination

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS
Hashem Alshurafat, Husam Ananzeh, Huthaifa Al-Hazaima, Mohannad Obeid Al Shbail
{"title":"Do different dimensions of corporate social responsibility disclosure have different economic consequence: multi-approaches for profitability examination","authors":"Hashem Alshurafat, Husam Ananzeh, Huthaifa Al-Hazaima, Mohannad Obeid Al Shbail","doi":"10.1108/cr-06-2022-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study examines the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (hereafter CSRD) on the Corporate Economic Performance (hereafter CEP) of a group of public shareholding companies in Jordan.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses different proxies to examine the impact of CSRD on companies’ financial and economic value. The data were collected from a sample of 94 companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2016. Based on a checklist of 41 indicators, this study employed the manual content analysis technique to collect and analyse CSRD data. A statistical analysis technique was also used to examine the hypothesized relationships between collected data on CSRD and profitability.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that CSRD is value-relevant. It is positively and statistically associated with firm value proxied by Tobin’s Q. In addition, it is positively and statistically associated with firm financial performance proxied by ROE and ROA.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study contributes to the research debate on the relationship between CSRD and CEP, particularly in developing nations. The study draws attention to the need for information on different dimensions of CSR, including human resource, environmental, product responsibility, and community participation, as disclosure on such dimensions is positively associated with profitability.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings provide important implications for Jordanian corporate managers to maintain CSRD in their best interest. With more emphasis on disclosing stand-alone CSR reports, corporate managers can present more information on different dimensions of CSR, attracting the attention of stakeholders such as investors, the government, media, and humanitarian activists and enhancing overall corporate goodwill.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nCSRD activities reflect a positive impact on CEP. Due to the dearth of relevant research conducted in developing countries, this study provides empirical evidence on the positive relationship between CSRD and CEP in an emerging economy, with more emphasis on specific dimensions of CSR, including human resources, environmental, product responsibility, and community participation. Since multiple proxies exist to measure profitability, this study uses multi-approaches for profitability examination proxied by Tobin’s Q, ROE, and ROA. Moreover, the issue of CSR is original and interesting to be examined in the Jordanian context, where the listed firms have reported a homogeneous perception of CSR.\n","PeriodicalId":46521,"journal":{"name":"Competitiveness Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competitiveness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-06-2022-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (hereafter CSRD) on the Corporate Economic Performance (hereafter CEP) of a group of public shareholding companies in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach This study uses different proxies to examine the impact of CSRD on companies’ financial and economic value. The data were collected from a sample of 94 companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2016. Based on a checklist of 41 indicators, this study employed the manual content analysis technique to collect and analyse CSRD data. A statistical analysis technique was also used to examine the hypothesized relationships between collected data on CSRD and profitability. Findings The findings indicate that CSRD is value-relevant. It is positively and statistically associated with firm value proxied by Tobin’s Q. In addition, it is positively and statistically associated with firm financial performance proxied by ROE and ROA. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the research debate on the relationship between CSRD and CEP, particularly in developing nations. The study draws attention to the need for information on different dimensions of CSR, including human resource, environmental, product responsibility, and community participation, as disclosure on such dimensions is positively associated with profitability. Practical implications The findings provide important implications for Jordanian corporate managers to maintain CSRD in their best interest. With more emphasis on disclosing stand-alone CSR reports, corporate managers can present more information on different dimensions of CSR, attracting the attention of stakeholders such as investors, the government, media, and humanitarian activists and enhancing overall corporate goodwill. Originality/value CSRD activities reflect a positive impact on CEP. Due to the dearth of relevant research conducted in developing countries, this study provides empirical evidence on the positive relationship between CSRD and CEP in an emerging economy, with more emphasis on specific dimensions of CSR, including human resources, environmental, product responsibility, and community participation. Since multiple proxies exist to measure profitability, this study uses multi-approaches for profitability examination proxied by Tobin’s Q, ROE, and ROA. Moreover, the issue of CSR is original and interesting to be examined in the Jordanian context, where the listed firms have reported a homogeneous perception of CSR.
企业社会责任披露的不同维度是否有不同的经济后果:盈利能力检验的多重方法
目的本研究考察了企业社会责任披露(以下简称CSRD)对约旦一组上市公司的企业经济绩效(以下简称CEP)的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究使用不同的代理来检验CSRD对公司财务和经济价值的影响。这些数据是从2010年至2016年在安曼证券交易所上市的94家公司的样本中收集的。基于41项指标的检查表,本研究采用人工内容分析技术收集和分析CSRD数据。还使用了统计分析技术来检验收集的CSRD数据与盈利能力之间的假设关系。研究结果表明CSRD具有价值相关性。它与托宾Q所代表的企业价值呈正相关。此外,它与ROE和ROA所代表的公司财务绩效呈正相关。研究局限性/含义本研究有助于关于CSRD和CEP之间关系的研究辩论,特别是在发展中国家。该研究提请注意对企业社会责任不同层面信息的需求,包括人力资源、环境、产品责任和社区参与,因为这些层面的信息披露与盈利能力呈正相关。实际意义研究结果为约旦企业管理者维护CSRD的最大利益提供了重要意义。随着更多地强调披露独立的企业社会责任报告,企业经理可以就企业社会责任的不同层面提供更多信息,吸引投资者、政府、媒体和人道主义活动家等利益相关者的注意,并增强企业的整体商誉。创意/价值CSRD活动反映了对CEP的积极影响。由于缺乏在发展中国家进行的相关研究,本研究为新兴经济体中CSRD和CEP之间的积极关系提供了实证证据,更强调了企业社会责任的具体层面,包括人力资源、环境、产品责任和社区参与。由于存在多个衡量盈利能力的指标,本研究使用了以托宾Q、ROE和ROA为代表的多种盈利能力检查方法。此外,企业社会责任问题具有独创性,值得在约旦背景下研究,约旦上市公司对企业社会责任的看法是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The following list indicates the key issues in the Competitiveness Review. We invite papers on these and related topics. Special issues of the Review will collect papers on specific topics selected by the editors. Definition/conceptual framework of competitiveness Competitiveness diagnostics and rankings Competitiveness and economic outcomes Specific dimensions of competitiveness Competitiveness and endowments Competitiveness and economic development Location and business strategy International business and the role of MNCs Innovation and innovative capacity Clusters and cluster initiatives Institutions for competitiveness Public policy (e.g., innovation, cluster development, regional development) The Competitiveness Review aims to publish high quality papers directed at scholars, government institutions, businesses and practitioners. It appears in collaboration with key academic and professional groups in the field of competitiveness analysis and policy, including the Microeconomics of Competitiveness (MOC) network and The Competitiveness Institute (TCI) practitioner network for competitiveness, clusters and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信