Race Differences in Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Utilization.

Shamira J Rothmiller, Brian C Lund, Diana J Burgess, Sangil Lee, Katherine Hadlandsmyth
{"title":"Race Differences in Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Utilization.","authors":"Shamira J Rothmiller, Brian C Lund, Diana J Burgess, Sangil Lee, Katherine Hadlandsmyth","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>African Americans (AAs) experience disparities in chronic pain care. This study aimed to identify the rates of emergency department (ED) utilization for visits associated with chronic pain diagnoses among AAs compared to Whites and to determine variables that accounted for any differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study used national Veterans Affairs (Veteran's Health Administration) administrative data to identify Veterans with chronic pain diagnoses in 2018. Race/ethnicity was self-reported and assessed to examine if differences exist in ED utilization. Differences between AAs and Whites were examined using negative binomial regression models, controlling for ethnicity. Multivariable models (including demographics, pain characteristics, psychiatric comorbidities, medical comorbidities, pain-related health care utilization, and medication utilization) were examined to determine factors that contributed to these disparities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,261,030 patients, 22% (n = 492,138) were AA. The incidence rate ratio of ED utilization for AAs, relative to Whites, was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.56-1.59). The only independent variable that produced a clinically meaningful reduction in the race effect on ED use was rurality, which was associated with reduced ED use. Post hoc model including all variables reduced the race effect to 1.37 (95% CI: 1.36-1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AA Veterans had a 58% greater risk of ED utilization for visits associated with chronic pain diagnoses relative to White Veterans, which remained meaningfully elevated after adjustment for observable confounders (37%). This observation may reflect disparities in outpatient chronic pain care for AAs. Future research could focus on enhancing therapeutic alliance in primary care to improve chronic pain treatment for AAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"3599-3605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: African Americans (AAs) experience disparities in chronic pain care. This study aimed to identify the rates of emergency department (ED) utilization for visits associated with chronic pain diagnoses among AAs compared to Whites and to determine variables that accounted for any differences.

Methods: This retrospective observational study used national Veterans Affairs (Veteran's Health Administration) administrative data to identify Veterans with chronic pain diagnoses in 2018. Race/ethnicity was self-reported and assessed to examine if differences exist in ED utilization. Differences between AAs and Whites were examined using negative binomial regression models, controlling for ethnicity. Multivariable models (including demographics, pain characteristics, psychiatric comorbidities, medical comorbidities, pain-related health care utilization, and medication utilization) were examined to determine factors that contributed to these disparities.

Results: Among the 2,261,030 patients, 22% (n = 492,138) were AA. The incidence rate ratio of ED utilization for AAs, relative to Whites, was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.56-1.59). The only independent variable that produced a clinically meaningful reduction in the race effect on ED use was rurality, which was associated with reduced ED use. Post hoc model including all variables reduced the race effect to 1.37 (95% CI: 1.36-1.38).

Conclusion: AA Veterans had a 58% greater risk of ED utilization for visits associated with chronic pain diagnoses relative to White Veterans, which remained meaningfully elevated after adjustment for observable confounders (37%). This observation may reflect disparities in outpatient chronic pain care for AAs. Future research could focus on enhancing therapeutic alliance in primary care to improve chronic pain treatment for AAs.

退伍军人事务急诊科使用率的种族差异
引言非裔美国人在慢性疼痛护理方面存在差异。本研究旨在确定AAs与白人相比,急诊科(ED)与慢性疼痛诊断相关的就诊率,并确定解释任何差异的变量。方法本回顾性观察性研究使用国家退伍军人事务局(退伍军人健康管理局)的行政数据来确定2018年被诊断为慢性疼痛的退伍军人。对种族/民族进行自我报告和评估,以检查ED利用率是否存在差异。AAs和白人之间的差异使用负二项回归模型进行检验,并控制种族。研究了多变量模型(包括人口统计学、疼痛特征、精神合并症、医学合并症、疼痛相关的医疗保健利用率和药物利用率),以确定导致这些差异的因素。结果2261030例患者中 = 492138)为AA。相对于白人,AAs的ED利用率为1.58(95%CI:1.56-1.59)。唯一对ED使用的种族效应产生临床意义降低的自变量是农村,这与ED使用的减少有关。包括所有变量的事后模型将种族效应降低到1.37(95%可信区间:1.36-1.38)。结论与白人退伍军人相比,退伍军人在与慢性疼痛诊断相关的就诊中使用ED的风险高58%,在调整了可观察的混杂因素后,这一风险仍显著升高(37%)。这一观察结果可能反映了AAs门诊慢性疼痛护理的差异。未来的研究可以集中在加强初级保健中的治疗联盟,以改善AAs的慢性疼痛治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信