Form/meaning asymmetry in word formation

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
E. Dugas
{"title":"Form/meaning asymmetry in word formation","authors":"E. Dugas","doi":"10.1075/CF.00018.DUG","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper deals with the French morphological prefixation pattern [non-N]\n (non-qualification ‘non-qualification’, non-Italien ‘non-Italian’, and\n non-ville ‘non-city’). It discusses the form/meaning asymmetry displayed by this pattern and its\n compositionality. It is shown that the general pattern [non-N] actually corresponds to three distinct\n subconstructions, i.e. distinct form/meaning pairings. Although pragmatic factors may be seen as presenting a challenge to the\n compositionality of these constructions, it is argued that [non-N]s must be seen as compositional as long as\n compositionality is defined not only in terms of truth-conditional semantics, but also of pragmatics.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00018.DUG","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The paper deals with the French morphological prefixation pattern [non-N] (non-qualification ‘non-qualification’, non-Italien ‘non-Italian’, and non-ville ‘non-city’). It discusses the form/meaning asymmetry displayed by this pattern and its compositionality. It is shown that the general pattern [non-N] actually corresponds to three distinct subconstructions, i.e. distinct form/meaning pairings. Although pragmatic factors may be seen as presenting a challenge to the compositionality of these constructions, it is argued that [non-N]s must be seen as compositional as long as compositionality is defined not only in terms of truth-conditional semantics, but also of pragmatics.
构词法的形式/意义不对称
本文讨论了法语的词形前缀模式[non-N](非限定的“非限定的”,非意大利的“非意大利的”和非维尔的“非城市的”)。它讨论了这种模式所表现出的形式/意义的不对称性及其复合性。结果表明,一般模式[nonn]实际上对应于三个不同的子结构,即不同的形式/意义配对。尽管语用因素可能被视为对这些结构的合成性提出了挑战,但有人认为,只要合成性不仅是根据真值条件语义定义的,而且是根据语用学定义的,就必须将[非N]视为合成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Constructions and Frames
Constructions and Frames LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信