Is there a need for orthogeriatric unit in the Indian hospital setup for managing hip fractures?

A. Kedar, S. Dwidmuthe, Devashis Barick
{"title":"Is there a need for orthogeriatric unit in the Indian hospital setup for managing hip fractures?","authors":"A. Kedar, S. Dwidmuthe, Devashis Barick","doi":"10.4103/JOAS.JOAS_9_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS: The current orthopedic treatment of geriatric hip fracture is inadequate as per the British Orthopaedic Association guidelines and hence to know whether there is a need of orthogeriatric unit in the tertiary hospital setups in India for the management of hip fracture. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study, held in tertiary care teaching hospital. The data of patients with age >60 years admitted with hip fracture of 2016–2017 were recorded from medical record section. Age, sex, type of fracture, total duration of admission, delay in surgery, and associated comorbidities were recorded. Patients who had undergone hip surgery electively for other hip or acetabular fracture were excluded from the study. OBSERVATION: There were a total of 81 cases of hip fracture, of which there were 39 males and 42 females. Seventy-one percent of patients were from the age group of 60–70 years. Maximum number of (54.3%), 44 Patients were having intertrochanteric fracture, followed by fracture of the neck of the femur (35 patients) and subtrochanteric fracture (7 patients). These patients were treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty, total hip replacement, or with proximal femoral nail fixation or with dynamic hip screw fixation. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, and hemiparesis were associated diseases. The maximum stay was 65 days, the minimum stay was 8 days, and the average stay was 13 days.The average delay between admission to surgery was 7 days, maximum of 24 days. We could not analyze the exact cause for delay due to lack of proper data in most of the cases. CONCLUSION (IMPACT OF STUDY): Hip fractures in the elderly in India are increasing and not getting the quality of care required. There is an urgent need to the implementation of orthogeriatric unit, and team approach is required to curtail the delay in treatment. This may lead to decrease in the cost of treatment, reduced postfracture morbidity, and mortality. Formation of hip fracture registry would also help us to analyze the present status of care for hip fractures in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":31882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Allied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JOAS.JOAS_9_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AIMS: The current orthopedic treatment of geriatric hip fracture is inadequate as per the British Orthopaedic Association guidelines and hence to know whether there is a need of orthogeriatric unit in the tertiary hospital setups in India for the management of hip fracture. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study, held in tertiary care teaching hospital. The data of patients with age >60 years admitted with hip fracture of 2016–2017 were recorded from medical record section. Age, sex, type of fracture, total duration of admission, delay in surgery, and associated comorbidities were recorded. Patients who had undergone hip surgery electively for other hip or acetabular fracture were excluded from the study. OBSERVATION: There were a total of 81 cases of hip fracture, of which there were 39 males and 42 females. Seventy-one percent of patients were from the age group of 60–70 years. Maximum number of (54.3%), 44 Patients were having intertrochanteric fracture, followed by fracture of the neck of the femur (35 patients) and subtrochanteric fracture (7 patients). These patients were treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty, total hip replacement, or with proximal femoral nail fixation or with dynamic hip screw fixation. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, and hemiparesis were associated diseases. The maximum stay was 65 days, the minimum stay was 8 days, and the average stay was 13 days.The average delay between admission to surgery was 7 days, maximum of 24 days. We could not analyze the exact cause for delay due to lack of proper data in most of the cases. CONCLUSION (IMPACT OF STUDY): Hip fractures in the elderly in India are increasing and not getting the quality of care required. There is an urgent need to the implementation of orthogeriatric unit, and team approach is required to curtail the delay in treatment. This may lead to decrease in the cost of treatment, reduced postfracture morbidity, and mortality. Formation of hip fracture registry would also help us to analyze the present status of care for hip fractures in the elderly.
在印度的医院里是否需要骨科来治疗髋部骨折?
目的:根据英国骨科协会的指南,目前对老年髋部骨折的骨科治疗是不够的,因此了解是否需要在印度三级医院设置骨科单元来管理髋部骨折。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,在三级护理教学医院进行。记录2016-2017年住院髋部骨折患者的病历资料,年龄为bb0 ~ 60岁。记录年龄、性别、骨折类型、住院总时间、手术延迟和相关合并症。因其他髋部或髋臼骨折选择性接受髋关节手术的患者被排除在研究之外。观察:共81例髋部骨折,其中男性39例,女性42例。71%的患者年龄在60-70岁之间。股骨粗隆间骨折44例(54.3%),其次为股骨颈骨折35例,股骨粗隆下骨折7例。这些患者接受双极半关节置换术、全髋关节置换术、股骨近端钉固定或动态髋螺钉固定。高血压、糖尿病、哮喘和偏瘫是相关疾病。最长停留时间为65天,最短停留时间为8天,平均停留时间为13天。入院至手术的平均延迟时间为7天,最长为24天。在大多数情况下,由于缺乏适当的数据,我们无法分析延迟的确切原因。结论(研究的影响):印度老年人髋部骨折的人数正在增加,但没有得到所需的护理质量。迫切需要实施骨科单元,需要团队方法来减少治疗延误。这可能会降低治疗费用,降低骨折后的发病率和死亡率。髋部骨折登记的形成也有助于我们分析老年人髋部骨折的护理现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信