Knowledge management to prevent fraudulent e-banding transactions

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
R. Barker
{"title":"Knowledge management to prevent fraudulent e-banding transactions","authors":"R. Barker","doi":"10.18820/24150525/COMM.V23.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of e-banking as financial institutions encourage customers to do online banking transactions opened opportunities for criminals and sophisticated fraudsters to perpetrate and abuse customers in their social, cyber and physical worlds. This emphasises the need for communication and knowledge sharing by the financial service industry to empower customers in identifying dynamic fraud from genuine customer behaviour. The boundary of liability with respect to fraudulent e-banking transactions is shifting from the banking industry to the customer, with the emphasis on concepts like co-liability. Despite continuous efforts by the financial industry to increase customer awareness, the dominating lack of clarity about when clients have acted negligently has become problematic, which can lead to loss of customer trust and a demand for better security. This article addresses the lack of research on this through a critical analysis of knowledge management to enhance security and customer trust in e-banking. The study investigates fraud prevention and available e-security measures, the legal consequences on co-liability to negate these potential negative consequences to the benefit of both the financial industry and the customer, and proposes a conceptual theoretical framework for e-banking fraud prevention and co-liability through proactive communication.","PeriodicalId":41956,"journal":{"name":"Communitas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150525/COMM.V23.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The growth of e-banking as financial institutions encourage customers to do online banking transactions opened opportunities for criminals and sophisticated fraudsters to perpetrate and abuse customers in their social, cyber and physical worlds. This emphasises the need for communication and knowledge sharing by the financial service industry to empower customers in identifying dynamic fraud from genuine customer behaviour. The boundary of liability with respect to fraudulent e-banking transactions is shifting from the banking industry to the customer, with the emphasis on concepts like co-liability. Despite continuous efforts by the financial industry to increase customer awareness, the dominating lack of clarity about when clients have acted negligently has become problematic, which can lead to loss of customer trust and a demand for better security. This article addresses the lack of research on this through a critical analysis of knowledge management to enhance security and customer trust in e-banking. The study investigates fraud prevention and available e-security measures, the legal consequences on co-liability to negate these potential negative consequences to the benefit of both the financial industry and the customer, and proposes a conceptual theoretical framework for e-banking fraud prevention and co-liability through proactive communication.
防止欺诈电子交易的知识管理
随着金融机构鼓励客户进行网上银行交易,电子银行的发展为犯罪分子和老练的欺诈者在社交、网络和物理世界中实施和虐待客户提供了机会。这强调了金融服务业进行沟通和知识共享的必要性,以使客户能够从真实的客户行为中识别动态欺诈。欺诈性电子银行交易的责任边界正在从银行业转移到客户,重点是连带责任等概念。尽管金融业不断努力提高客户意识,但对客户何时疏忽行为的不明确已经成为问题,这可能导致客户失去信任,并要求更好的安全性。本文通过对提高电子银行安全性和客户信任的知识管理的批判性分析,解决了这方面研究的不足。该研究调查了欺诈预防和可用的电子安全措施,以及共同责任的法律后果,以消除这些潜在的负面后果,造福金融业和客户,并提出了通过积极沟通预防电子银行欺诈和共同责任的概念理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communitas
Communitas COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信