Trends in Baldwin Criticism, 2016–17

Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. Vogel
{"title":"Trends in Baldwin Criticism, 2016–17","authors":"J. Vogel","doi":"10.7227/JBR.6.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin\n studies between the years 2016 and 2017, reflecting on important scholarly\n events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in\n criticism. Surveying the field as a whole, the most notable features are the\n “political turn” that seeks to connect Baldwin’s social\n insights from the past to the present, and the ongoing access to and interest in\n the Baldwin archive. In addition to these larger trends, there is continued\n interest in situating Baldwin in national, regional, and geographical contexts\n as well as interest with how he grapples with and illuminates issues of gender\n and sexuality.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/JBR.6.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review article charts the general direction of scholarship in James Baldwin studies between the years 2016 and 2017, reflecting on important scholarly events and publications of the period and identifying notable trends in criticism. Surveying the field as a whole, the most notable features are the “political turn” that seeks to connect Baldwin’s social insights from the past to the present, and the ongoing access to and interest in the Baldwin archive. In addition to these larger trends, there is continued interest in situating Baldwin in national, regional, and geographical contexts as well as interest with how he grapples with and illuminates issues of gender and sexuality.
鲍德温批评的趋势,2016-17
这篇综述文章描绘了2016年至2017年间詹姆斯·鲍德温研究的总体学术方向,反思了这一时期的重要学术事件和出版物,并确定了批评的显著趋势。纵观整个领域,最显著的特征是“政治转向”,试图将鲍德温从过去到现在的社会见解联系起来,以及对鲍德温档案的持续访问和兴趣。除了这些更大的趋势之外,人们继续对鲍德温在国家、地区和地理背景下的定位感兴趣,也对他如何处理和阐明性别和性问题感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信