On Foremothers, Muses, and Black Feminist Theorizing

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Simone C. Drake
{"title":"On Foremothers, Muses, and Black Feminist Theorizing","authors":"Simone C. Drake","doi":"10.1080/00497878.2022.2163396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are some things I am unapologetic about. One of those things is my disinterest in framing my academic work with the theories of dead white men. As a scholar of Black cultural studies, I am often perplexed by the logic that theories born out of spaces and epistemes that have contributed to Black oppression could be useful for my efforts to investigate and analyze ways Black people negotiate that oppression. I approach this work recognizing Black people as active agents, so I think it only appropriate to privilege the ways in which we ourselves do this work, often as both metaphorical and literal efforts to save our lives. Thus, when teaching Black cultural studies courses, I have no qualms telling graduate students, “There is nothing Derrida or Foucault can tell me that Morrison does not do better.” Elaborating, I explain that for the type of research I do, the creative and intellectual oeuvre of Toni Morrison, for example, is amazingly rich and far more relevant to the global Black experience than the theorizing done by most dead and living white men. This of course does not mean I frown upon being familiar with the scholarship of dead (or living) white men, but I do not privilege it when doing critical Black studies, as I find the impetus and essence of whitewashed critical theory to often be counterintuitive and to fall short when theorizing the intersections of race, gender, sexuality, and nation. I embrace Barbara Christian’s enduring 1987 interrogative: “For whom are we doing what we are doing when we do literary criticism?’” (77). I know who I do it for; I do it for people who look like me and move through the world being judged for looking like me. This essay considers the theoretical function of Morrison’s creative work as a method for studying Black cultural texts that are steeped in a Black feminist tradition that Morrison both inherited and passed on. As both a cultural producer working across multiple genres and one of the most astute cultural critics, Morrison is a force to be reckoned with, but she is not an anomaly. She is situated within a continuum of Black feminist cultural theorizing that, through the disruption of hegemonic epistemologies, interrupts whitewashed discourse that triggers eruptions of alternative ways of knowing and being in Black women’s cultural productions. In this essay,","PeriodicalId":45212,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2022.2163396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are some things I am unapologetic about. One of those things is my disinterest in framing my academic work with the theories of dead white men. As a scholar of Black cultural studies, I am often perplexed by the logic that theories born out of spaces and epistemes that have contributed to Black oppression could be useful for my efforts to investigate and analyze ways Black people negotiate that oppression. I approach this work recognizing Black people as active agents, so I think it only appropriate to privilege the ways in which we ourselves do this work, often as both metaphorical and literal efforts to save our lives. Thus, when teaching Black cultural studies courses, I have no qualms telling graduate students, “There is nothing Derrida or Foucault can tell me that Morrison does not do better.” Elaborating, I explain that for the type of research I do, the creative and intellectual oeuvre of Toni Morrison, for example, is amazingly rich and far more relevant to the global Black experience than the theorizing done by most dead and living white men. This of course does not mean I frown upon being familiar with the scholarship of dead (or living) white men, but I do not privilege it when doing critical Black studies, as I find the impetus and essence of whitewashed critical theory to often be counterintuitive and to fall short when theorizing the intersections of race, gender, sexuality, and nation. I embrace Barbara Christian’s enduring 1987 interrogative: “For whom are we doing what we are doing when we do literary criticism?’” (77). I know who I do it for; I do it for people who look like me and move through the world being judged for looking like me. This essay considers the theoretical function of Morrison’s creative work as a method for studying Black cultural texts that are steeped in a Black feminist tradition that Morrison both inherited and passed on. As both a cultural producer working across multiple genres and one of the most astute cultural critics, Morrison is a force to be reckoned with, but she is not an anomaly. She is situated within a continuum of Black feminist cultural theorizing that, through the disruption of hegemonic epistemologies, interrupts whitewashed discourse that triggers eruptions of alternative ways of knowing and being in Black women’s cultural productions. In this essay,
论先祖、缪斯与黑人女权主义理论
有些事情我不道歉。其中一件事是,我对用死去的白人的理论来构建我的学术工作不感兴趣。作为一名黑人文化研究学者,我经常对这样一种逻辑感到困惑,即产生于助长黑人压迫的空间和认识论的理论可能有助于我调查和分析黑人谈判压迫的方式。我在处理这项工作时认识到黑人是积极的代理人,所以我认为只有优先考虑我们自己做这项工作的方式才合适,通常是隐喻和字面上的拯救生命的努力。因此,在教授黑人文化研究课程时,我毫不犹豫地告诉研究生,“德里达或福柯没有什么能告诉我莫里森做得更好。”我解释说,就我所做的研究类型而言,比如托尼·莫里森的创造性和智识性作品,比大多数死去和活着的白人所做的理论更丰富,与全球黑人的经历更相关。当然,这并不意味着我不喜欢熟悉死去(或活着)的白人男性的学术,但在进行批判性黑人研究时,我并不认为这是一种特权,因为我发现被粉饰的批判性理论的动力和本质往往是违反直觉的,在对种族、性别、性和国家的交叉点进行理论化时也不够。我接受了芭芭拉·克里斯蒂安1987年那句经久不衰的疑问句:“当我们进行文学批评时,我们在为谁做我们正在做的事情?”(77)。我知道我这样做是为了谁;我这样做是为了那些长得像我的人,以及那些在世界上因长得像而被评判的人。这篇文章认为,莫里森的创造性工作的理论功能是研究黑人文化文本的一种方法,这些文本沉浸在莫里森继承和传承的黑人女权主义传统中。作为一名跨多个流派的文化制作人和最精明的文化评论家之一,莫里森是一股不可忽视的力量,但她并不是一个异类。她处于黑人女权主义文化理论的连续体中,通过霸权认识论的颠覆,打断了被粉饰的话语,从而引发了黑人女性文化作品中其他认识和存在方式的爆发。在本文中,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL
WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信