Satisfação e ajuste à prótese de indivíduos com amputação de membro inferior

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aline Beatriz Córdova De Souza, Lisiane Piazza Luza, Greicy Kelly Wosniak Pires, Elizandra Gonçalves Ferreira, Sara Maria Soffiatti Dias, Rudney da Silva
{"title":"Satisfação e ajuste à prótese de indivíduos com amputação de membro inferior","authors":"Aline Beatriz Córdova De Souza, Lisiane Piazza Luza, Greicy Kelly Wosniak Pires, Elizandra Gonçalves Ferreira, Sara Maria Soffiatti Dias, Rudney da Silva","doi":"10.15448/1980-6108.2019.1.33075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS: Evaluate satisfaction and adjustment to the prosthesis of individuals with lower limb amputation.METHODS: Participants were 24 patients with lower limb amputation with 46,1±17,5 years and using the prosthesis for 10,8±8,7 years. A card was used to characterize the individuals and the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) to evaluate satisfaction and adjustment to the prosthesis. Data were collected from institutions that serving amputees in the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina and analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics at a 5% significance level.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the results of the PEQ between individuals when compared to the level of amputation and time using the prosthesis. Regarding the scores between groups with vascular and traumatic amputation, was a significant difference in residual limb health subscale, with higher scores and consequently better health of the residual limb in amputees with vascular causes, besides better higher scores on the scale of satisfaction in these individuals.CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that patients with a vascular cause of amputation are more satisfied with their prosthesis, with the way they walk and how things are from amputation and also have better health of the residual limb in relation to individuals with traumatic amputation. However, the level and time of amputation do not seem to influence the satisfaction and adjustment of the prosthesis.","PeriodicalId":44024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15448/1980-6108.2019.1.33075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2019.1.33075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS: Evaluate satisfaction and adjustment to the prosthesis of individuals with lower limb amputation.METHODS: Participants were 24 patients with lower limb amputation with 46,1±17,5 years and using the prosthesis for 10,8±8,7 years. A card was used to characterize the individuals and the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) to evaluate satisfaction and adjustment to the prosthesis. Data were collected from institutions that serving amputees in the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina and analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics at a 5% significance level.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the results of the PEQ between individuals when compared to the level of amputation and time using the prosthesis. Regarding the scores between groups with vascular and traumatic amputation, was a significant difference in residual limb health subscale, with higher scores and consequently better health of the residual limb in amputees with vascular causes, besides better higher scores on the scale of satisfaction in these individuals.CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that patients with a vascular cause of amputation are more satisfied with their prosthesis, with the way they walk and how things are from amputation and also have better health of the residual limb in relation to individuals with traumatic amputation. However, the level and time of amputation do not seem to influence the satisfaction and adjustment of the prosthesis.
下肢截肢患者对假体的满意度和适宜性
目的:评价下肢截肢患者对假肢的满意度和适应性。方法:研究对象为24例下肢截肢患者,共46,1±17.5年,假体使用时间为10,8±8,7年。使用卡片来描述个体特征,并使用假体评估问卷(PEQ)来评估对假体的满意度和适应性。数据从南巴西格兰德州和圣卡塔琳娜州为截肢者提供服务的机构收集,并通过描述性和推断性统计在5%的显著性水平上进行分析。结果:与截肢水平和使用假体的时间相比,个体之间的PEQ结果无显著差异。在血管性和外伤性截肢组之间,残肢健康亚量表得分存在显著差异,血管性截肢者残肢健康得分越高,满意度得分越高。结论:与创伤性截肢患者相比,血管性截肢患者对假肢、行走方式和截肢后的生活状况更满意,残肢健康状况也更好。然而,截肢的水平和时间似乎不影响假体的满意度和调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientia Medica
Scientia Medica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信