A Reassessment of ANOVA Reporting Practices: A Review of Three APA Journals

Yuanyuan Zhou, S. T. Skidmore
{"title":"A Reassessment of ANOVA Reporting Practices: A Review of Three APA Journals","authors":"Yuanyuan Zhou, S. T. Skidmore","doi":"10.2458/V8I1.22019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, ANOVA has been the most prevalent statistical method used in educational and psychological research and today ANOVA continues to be widely used.  A comprehensive review published in 1998 examined several APA journals and discovered persistent concerns in ANOVA reporting practices.  The present authors examined all articles published in 2012 in three APA journals ( Journal of Applied Psychology , Journal of Counseling Psychology , and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ) to review ANOVA reporting practices including p values and effect sizes.  Results indicated that ANOVA continues to be prevalent in the reviewed journals as a test of the primary research question, as well as to test conditional assumptions prior to the primary analysis.  Still, ANOVA reporting practices are essentially unchanged from what was previously reported.  However, effect size reporting has improved.","PeriodicalId":90602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":"3-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2458/V8I1.22019","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/V8I1.22019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Historically, ANOVA has been the most prevalent statistical method used in educational and psychological research and today ANOVA continues to be widely used.  A comprehensive review published in 1998 examined several APA journals and discovered persistent concerns in ANOVA reporting practices.  The present authors examined all articles published in 2012 in three APA journals ( Journal of Applied Psychology , Journal of Counseling Psychology , and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ) to review ANOVA reporting practices including p values and effect sizes.  Results indicated that ANOVA continues to be prevalent in the reviewed journals as a test of the primary research question, as well as to test conditional assumptions prior to the primary analysis.  Still, ANOVA reporting practices are essentially unchanged from what was previously reported.  However, effect size reporting has improved.
方差分析报告实践的再评估:三份APA期刊综述
历史上,方差分析一直是教育和心理学研究中最流行的统计方法,今天方差分析继续被广泛使用。1998年发表的一篇综合综述检查了几本APA期刊,发现了方差分析报告实践中持续存在的问题。本文的作者检查了2012年发表在美国心理学会三种期刊(《应用心理学杂志》、《咨询心理学杂志》和《个性与社会心理学杂志》)上的所有文章,以回顾方差分析报告的实践,包括p值和效应大小。结果表明,ANOVA在被审查的期刊中继续流行,作为主要研究问题的检验,以及在主要分析之前检验条件假设。尽管如此,方差分析报告实践基本上与以前的报告没有变化。然而,效应大小报告有所改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信