Introduction: Pentecostalism and Historic Churches

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
M. Sigler
{"title":"Introduction: Pentecostalism and Historic Churches","authors":"M. Sigler","doi":"10.1080/0458063x.2022.2085972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“New Sect of Fanatics Is Breaking Loose,” read the front-page byline of the Los Angeles Daily Times on April 18, 1906, in a report on the Azusa St. Revival. Pentecostalism was indeed about to “break loose” and impact the church across the globe. Whether or not this “sect” is full of “fanatics” depends, of course, on one’s perspective. Pentecostalism emphasizes a personal encounter with the Holy Spirit often referred to as the “baptism of the Holy Spirit” and evidenced by “speaking in tongues” (glossolalia), supernatural healing, and prophecy. For half a century after the Asuza St. Revival, the impact of Pentecostalism was most acutely felt outside of long-established denominations. In 1960, however, a young Episcopal priest announced to his congregation that he had received the baptism of the Holy Spirit and had spoken in tongues. Over the next several years many in the historic churches would experience this phenomenon. Media outlets from CBS Evening News to Time Magazine would report on this growing movement. Initially, participants and observers described what was happening as “Pentecostal,” but eventually adopted the term “Charismatic”—a term first used by Lutheran minister, Harald Bredesen. Drawing form the Greek word “charismata,” meaning “gifts of grace,” those who were experiencing the “Charismatic Renewal” believed that God, by the Spirit, was renewing the spiritual gifts that were bestowed on the church at Pentecost. This issue of Liturgy explores the crosspollination between Pentecostal/Charismatic streams and what might be called “mainline” or “historic” denominations. These terms are fraught with difficulties. “Mainline” often refers to Protestant congregations in the US who have benefited from their relationship within American society. However, we do not limit our exploration to Protestant traditions in this issue and have opted for the term “historic churches.” Yet, this is equally problematic. The Church of God in Christ—the main denomination launched from the Pentecostal revival—is certainly historic in its own right. In using the term “historic churches” we are referring to those congregations who were not influenced by first-wave Pentecostalism but were later impacted by Pentecostal piety. The first essay explores what will become an important thread in this issue, the piety of Pentecostal/Charismatic worship. In her essay, Debbie Wong shows how Charismatics in mainline congregations embraced common values for encountering God in worship, while upholding a wide array of liturgical traditions. My essay unpacks this further by looking at worship in Fr. Dennis Bennet’s Episcopal congregation in Seattle, Washington, during the 1960s. Billy Kangas shows how the Charismatic Renewal took root within Roman Catholic congregations, especially through Covenant Communities. The fourth essay is an insider’s report on the Union of Charismatic Orthodox Churches (UCOC) from Bishop Emilio Alvarez. Emily Snider Andrews traces the history of music ministry training within the Southern Baptist Church to show how the Charismatic Renewal has impacted the denomination. Lastly, Adam Perez and Victoria Larson consider ways in which the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America resisted the growing influence of Charismatic piety within its own liturgical practices.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063x.2022.2085972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“New Sect of Fanatics Is Breaking Loose,” read the front-page byline of the Los Angeles Daily Times on April 18, 1906, in a report on the Azusa St. Revival. Pentecostalism was indeed about to “break loose” and impact the church across the globe. Whether or not this “sect” is full of “fanatics” depends, of course, on one’s perspective. Pentecostalism emphasizes a personal encounter with the Holy Spirit often referred to as the “baptism of the Holy Spirit” and evidenced by “speaking in tongues” (glossolalia), supernatural healing, and prophecy. For half a century after the Asuza St. Revival, the impact of Pentecostalism was most acutely felt outside of long-established denominations. In 1960, however, a young Episcopal priest announced to his congregation that he had received the baptism of the Holy Spirit and had spoken in tongues. Over the next several years many in the historic churches would experience this phenomenon. Media outlets from CBS Evening News to Time Magazine would report on this growing movement. Initially, participants and observers described what was happening as “Pentecostal,” but eventually adopted the term “Charismatic”—a term first used by Lutheran minister, Harald Bredesen. Drawing form the Greek word “charismata,” meaning “gifts of grace,” those who were experiencing the “Charismatic Renewal” believed that God, by the Spirit, was renewing the spiritual gifts that were bestowed on the church at Pentecost. This issue of Liturgy explores the crosspollination between Pentecostal/Charismatic streams and what might be called “mainline” or “historic” denominations. These terms are fraught with difficulties. “Mainline” often refers to Protestant congregations in the US who have benefited from their relationship within American society. However, we do not limit our exploration to Protestant traditions in this issue and have opted for the term “historic churches.” Yet, this is equally problematic. The Church of God in Christ—the main denomination launched from the Pentecostal revival—is certainly historic in its own right. In using the term “historic churches” we are referring to those congregations who were not influenced by first-wave Pentecostalism but were later impacted by Pentecostal piety. The first essay explores what will become an important thread in this issue, the piety of Pentecostal/Charismatic worship. In her essay, Debbie Wong shows how Charismatics in mainline congregations embraced common values for encountering God in worship, while upholding a wide array of liturgical traditions. My essay unpacks this further by looking at worship in Fr. Dennis Bennet’s Episcopal congregation in Seattle, Washington, during the 1960s. Billy Kangas shows how the Charismatic Renewal took root within Roman Catholic congregations, especially through Covenant Communities. The fourth essay is an insider’s report on the Union of Charismatic Orthodox Churches (UCOC) from Bishop Emilio Alvarez. Emily Snider Andrews traces the history of music ministry training within the Southern Baptist Church to show how the Charismatic Renewal has impacted the denomination. Lastly, Adam Perez and Victoria Larson consider ways in which the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America resisted the growing influence of Charismatic piety within its own liturgical practices.
引言:五旬节派和历史教会
1906年4月18日,《洛杉矶每日时报》在头版的一篇关于阿祖萨圣复兴的报道中写道:“新狂热派正在瓦解。”。五旬节主义确实即将“瓦解”,并影响到全球各地的教会。当然,这个“教派”是否充满了“狂热分子”取决于人们的观点。五旬节主义强调个人与圣灵的相遇,通常被称为“圣灵的洗礼”,并通过“用舌头说话”(舌语)、超自然的治愈和预言来证明。在阿苏扎圣复兴之后的半个世纪里,五旬节主义的影响在长期建立的教派之外最为强烈。然而,1960年,一位年轻的圣公会牧师向他的会众宣布,他接受了圣灵的洗礼,并会说方言。在接下来的几年里,许多历史悠久的教堂都会经历这种现象。从哥伦比亚广播公司晚间新闻到时代杂志等媒体都会报道这场愈演愈烈的运动。最初,参与者和观察者将正在发生的事情描述为“五旬节派”,但最终采用了“魅力”一词——这个词最初由路德会牧师哈拉尔·布雷德森使用。根据希腊语单词“charismata”,意思是“恩典的礼物”,那些正在经历“魅力复兴”的人相信,上帝通过圣灵,正在复兴五旬节授予教会的精神礼物。本期《Liturgy》探讨了五旬节派/魅力派与所谓的“主线”或“历史”教派之间的异花授粉。这些条款充满了困难。“主线”通常指的是从美国社会关系中受益的美国新教会众。然而,在这个问题上,我们并没有将我们的探索局限于新教传统,而是选择了“历史教堂”一词。然而,这同样有问题。基督里的上帝教会——五旬节复活后成立的主要教派——本身就具有历史意义。在使用“历史教堂”一词时,我们指的是那些没有受到第一波五旬节主义影响,但后来受到五旬节虔诚影响的会众。第一篇文章探讨了五旬节派/魅力崇拜的虔诚将成为这一问题的重要线索。在她的文章中,Debbie Wong展示了主流会众的魅力主义者如何在崇拜中与上帝相遇时接受共同的价值观,同时坚持广泛的礼拜传统。我的文章通过观察20世纪60年代华盛顿州西雅图的Dennis Bennet神父的圣公会会众的崇拜,进一步揭示了这一点。Billy Kangas展示了魅力复兴是如何在罗马天主教会中扎根的,尤其是通过圣约社。第四篇文章是埃米利奥·阿尔瓦雷斯主教关于魅力东正教联盟(UCOC)的内部人士报告。Emily Snider Andrews追溯了南浸信会音乐事工培训的历史,以展示魅力复兴如何影响该教派。最后,Adam Perez和Victoria Larson考虑了美国福音路德教会在其礼拜实践中抵制魅力虔诚日益增长的影响的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信