An International Online Survey on Public Attitudes Towards the Keeping of Whales and Dolphins in Captivity

Q3 Social Sciences
W. Naylor, E. Parsons
{"title":"An International Online Survey on Public Attitudes Towards the Keeping of Whales and Dolphins in Captivity","authors":"W. Naylor, E. Parsons","doi":"10.3727/154427319x15627970573318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, an international online survey was conducted to investigate public attitudes on keeping cetaceans in captivity (N = 858). Respondents were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely to be opposed to displaying dolphins and whales in marine theme parks and aquariums\n (opposed to captive display: 54.4%; support captive display: 45.5%). Only 5% of respondents from the US stated they \"strongly support\" (with 33.3% \"support\") keeping dolphins and whales in marine theme parks and aquariums, while 21% of participants from India did so (43.4% \"support\"). Participants\n that support cetaceans in captivity were significantly more likely to believe cetacean conservation is not important. Six times as many respondents (or 86%) preferred to view cetaceans in the wild via whale watching (61% preferring boat based, 25% land based) versus in captivity. Respondents\n from the US were less likely to prefer watching cetaceans in a marine theme park (9%) than those from India (26%). Almost 80% of respondents objected to capturing free-ranging dolphins and whales for display in zoos and aquariums. Only 19% of respondents indicated approval for dolphins performing\n shows involving tricks for human enjoyment, while 85% supported keeping dolphins in captivity when they are sick or injured. Eighty percent supported captive research that benefited conservation of free-ranging populations, dropping to 60% when the research supported the development of captive\n husbandry methods. Seventy percent of participants were opposed to keeping cetaceans in concrete tanks, versus 53% who were opposed to sea pen enclosures as well. Respondents who believed dolphin and whale conservation was not important were significantly more likely to oppose keeping captive\n dolphins for research benefiting conservation in the wild. Moreover, respondents who felt dolphin and whale conservation was only \"slightly important\" were significantly more like to support keeping captive cetaceans for entertainment purposes.","PeriodicalId":35146,"journal":{"name":"Tourism in Marine Environments","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3727/154427319x15627970573318","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism in Marine Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/154427319x15627970573318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In 2015, an international online survey was conducted to investigate public attitudes on keeping cetaceans in captivity (N = 858). Respondents were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely to be opposed to displaying dolphins and whales in marine theme parks and aquariums (opposed to captive display: 54.4%; support captive display: 45.5%). Only 5% of respondents from the US stated they "strongly support" (with 33.3% "support") keeping dolphins and whales in marine theme parks and aquariums, while 21% of participants from India did so (43.4% "support"). Participants that support cetaceans in captivity were significantly more likely to believe cetacean conservation is not important. Six times as many respondents (or 86%) preferred to view cetaceans in the wild via whale watching (61% preferring boat based, 25% land based) versus in captivity. Respondents from the US were less likely to prefer watching cetaceans in a marine theme park (9%) than those from India (26%). Almost 80% of respondents objected to capturing free-ranging dolphins and whales for display in zoos and aquariums. Only 19% of respondents indicated approval for dolphins performing shows involving tricks for human enjoyment, while 85% supported keeping dolphins in captivity when they are sick or injured. Eighty percent supported captive research that benefited conservation of free-ranging populations, dropping to 60% when the research supported the development of captive husbandry methods. Seventy percent of participants were opposed to keeping cetaceans in concrete tanks, versus 53% who were opposed to sea pen enclosures as well. Respondents who believed dolphin and whale conservation was not important were significantly more likely to oppose keeping captive dolphins for research benefiting conservation in the wild. Moreover, respondents who felt dolphin and whale conservation was only "slightly important" were significantly more like to support keeping captive cetaceans for entertainment purposes.
关于公众对圈养鲸鱼和海豚态度的国际在线调查
2015年进行了一项国际在线调查,调查公众对圈养鲸类动物的态度(N = 858)。受访者明显(p < 0.001)反对在海洋主题公园和水族馆展示海豚和鲸鱼(反对圈养展示:54.4%;支持自保显示:45.5%)。只有5%的美国受访者表示他们“强烈支持”(33.3%的人“支持”)在海洋主题公园和水族馆中饲养海豚和鲸鱼,而21%的印度受访者表示支持(43.4%的人“支持”)。支持圈养鲸类动物的参与者更有可能认为保护鲸类动物并不重要。六倍的受访者(或86%)更喜欢通过观鲸在野外观看鲸类(61%的人喜欢在船上,25%的人喜欢在陆地上)而不是圈养。来自美国的受访者(9%)比来自印度的受访者(26%)更不喜欢在海洋主题公园里观看鲸类动物。近80%的受访者反对捕获自由放养的海豚和鲸鱼,以便在动物园和水族馆展出。只有19%的受访者表示赞成海豚表演人类娱乐的把戏,而85%的人支持在海豚生病或受伤时将它们囚禁起来。80%的人支持有利于保护自由放养种群的圈养研究,当研究支持圈养饲养方法的发展时,这一比例降至60%。70%的参与者反对将鲸类动物关在混凝土水箱中,而53%的人也反对将鲸类动物关在海洋围栏中。认为海豚和鲸鱼保护不重要的受访者更有可能反对圈养海豚用于有利于野生保护的研究。此外,认为海豚和鲸鱼保护只是“稍微重要”的受访者更倾向于支持将圈养鲸类动物用于娱乐目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tourism in Marine Environments
Tourism in Marine Environments Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Tourism in Marine Environments is an interdisciplinary journal dealing with a variety of management issues in marine settings. It is a scientific journal that draws upon the expertise of academics and practitioners from various disciplines related to the marine environment, including tourism, marine science, geography, social sciences, psychology, environmental studies, economics, marketing, and many more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信