Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering

Jia-ling Wang, J. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, Z. Di
{"title":"Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering","authors":"Jia-ling Wang, J. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, Z. Di","doi":"10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We use four Earth system models (ESMs) to simulate climate\nunder the modest greenhouse emissions RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway), the “business-as-usual”\nRCP8.5 and the stratospheric aerosol injection G4 geoengineering scenarios.\nThese drive a 10 km resolution dynamically downscaled model (Weather Research and Forecasting, WRF) and a\nstatistically bias-corrected (Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project, ISIMIP) and downscaled simulation in a\n450×330 km domain containing the Beijing Province, ranging from\n2000 m elevation to sea level. The 1980s simulations of surface\ntemperatures, humidities and wind speeds using statistical bias correction\nmake for a better estimate of mean climate determined by ERA5 reanalysis\ndata than does the WRF simulation. However correcting the WRF output with\nquantile delta mapping bias correction removes the offsets in mean state and\nresults in WRF better reproducing observations over 2007–2017 than ISIMIP\nbias correction. The WRF simulations consistently show 0.5 ∘C higher\nmean annual temperatures than from ISIMIP due both to the better resolved\ncity centres and also to warmer winter temperatures. In the 2060s WRF\nproduces consistently larger spatial ranges of surface temperatures,\nhumidities and wind speeds than ISIMIP downscaling across the Beijing\nProvince for all three future scenarios. The WRF and ISIMIP methods produce very\nsimilar spatial patterns of temperature with G4 and are always cooler than\nRCP4.5 and RCP8.5, by a slightly larger amount with ISIMIP than WRF.\nHumidity scenario differences vary greatly between ESMs, and hence ISIMIP\ndownscaling, while for WRF the results are far more consistent across ESMs\nand show only small changes between scenarios. Mean wind speeds show\nsimilarly small changes over the domain, although G4 is significantly\nwindier under WRF than either RCP scenario.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. We use four Earth system models (ESMs) to simulate climate under the modest greenhouse emissions RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway), the “business-as-usual” RCP8.5 and the stratospheric aerosol injection G4 geoengineering scenarios. These drive a 10 km resolution dynamically downscaled model (Weather Research and Forecasting, WRF) and a statistically bias-corrected (Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project, ISIMIP) and downscaled simulation in a 450×330 km domain containing the Beijing Province, ranging from 2000 m elevation to sea level. The 1980s simulations of surface temperatures, humidities and wind speeds using statistical bias correction make for a better estimate of mean climate determined by ERA5 reanalysis data than does the WRF simulation. However correcting the WRF output with quantile delta mapping bias correction removes the offsets in mean state and results in WRF better reproducing observations over 2007–2017 than ISIMIP bias correction. The WRF simulations consistently show 0.5 ∘C higher mean annual temperatures than from ISIMIP due both to the better resolved city centres and also to warmer winter temperatures. In the 2060s WRF produces consistently larger spatial ranges of surface temperatures, humidities and wind speeds than ISIMIP downscaling across the Beijing Province for all three future scenarios. The WRF and ISIMIP methods produce very similar spatial patterns of temperature with G4 and are always cooler than RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, by a slightly larger amount with ISIMIP than WRF. Humidity scenario differences vary greatly between ESMs, and hence ISIMIP downscaling, while for WRF the results are far more consistent across ESMs and show only small changes between scenarios. Mean wind speeds show similarly small changes over the domain, although G4 is significantly windier under WRF than either RCP scenario.
平流层气溶胶注入地球工程下北京地区温度、湿度和风速的区域动力和统计降尺度
摘要我们使用四个地球系统模型(ESM)来模拟适度温室气体排放RCP4.5(代表性浓度路径)、“一切照旧”RCP8.5和平流层气溶胶注入G4地球工程场景下的气候。这些驱动10 km分辨率的动态缩小模型(天气研究与预报,WRF)和非定常偏差校正(部门间影响模型相互比较项目,ISIMIP),以及在a450×330中缩小模拟 km域,包含北京省,范围从2000年 m高程至海平面。与WRF模拟相比,20世纪80年代使用统计偏差校正对地表温度、湿度和风速进行的模拟能够更好地估计ERA5重新分析数据确定的平均气候。然而,使用分位数delta映射偏差校正校正WRF输出可以消除平均状态下的偏移,并导致WRF在2007-2017年比ISIMIP偏差校正更好地再现观测结果。WRF模拟一致显示0.5 ∘C比ISIMIP更高的年温度,这既是因为更好的解决方案中心,也是因为更温暖的冬季温度。在2060年代,WRF在北京省产生的地表温度、湿度和风速的空间范围始终大于ISIMIP在未来三种情况下的降尺度。WRF和ISIMIP方法产生了与G4非常相似的温度空间模式,并且总是比RCP4.5和RCP8.5冷,ISIMIP的温度比WRF略高。ESM之间的湿度场景差异很大,因此ISIMIP缩小了规模,而WRF的结果在ESM之间更一致,并且在场景之间只显示出微小的变化。平均风速在整个区域内显示出类似的小变化,尽管G4在WRF下的风力比任何RCP场景都要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信