{"title":"How the Christian Right Slayed a Monster and Reframed the Religion Clauses in Bremerton","authors":"Joshua C. Wilson, Amanda Hollis‐Brusky","doi":"10.1086/724187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abortion and religious liberty remain the core and foundational pillars of the Christian Right, even as the movement’s interests have diversified over the decades. As Jerry Falwell, a founding architect of the movement, stated, Christian conservatives sprang into action because they felt the nation was “virtually driving God from the public square. And then, of course, Roe vs. Wade in the middle of all that.” Two Roberts Court decisions last term thus represent the culmination of decades of dedicated work by the Christian Right. These two cases areDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned national abortion rights and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, the First Amendment case involving the high school coach discouraged from leading prayers on the field after football games. Just like Dobbs, Bremerton is the product of a decades-long investment in building institutions and ways of seeing the world that have marked the rise of the Christian Right. Moreover, this investment in institutions and ideas has succeeded in crystallizing a distinct Christian Right worldview—one centered on the identity","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abortion and religious liberty remain the core and foundational pillars of the Christian Right, even as the movement’s interests have diversified over the decades. As Jerry Falwell, a founding architect of the movement, stated, Christian conservatives sprang into action because they felt the nation was “virtually driving God from the public square. And then, of course, Roe vs. Wade in the middle of all that.” Two Roberts Court decisions last term thus represent the culmination of decades of dedicated work by the Christian Right. These two cases areDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned national abortion rights and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, the First Amendment case involving the high school coach discouraged from leading prayers on the field after football games. Just like Dobbs, Bremerton is the product of a decades-long investment in building institutions and ways of seeing the world that have marked the rise of the Christian Right. Moreover, this investment in institutions and ideas has succeeded in crystallizing a distinct Christian Right worldview—one centered on the identity
堕胎和宗教自由仍然是基督教右翼的核心和基本支柱,尽管几十年来该运动的利益已经多样化。正如该运动的创始人之一杰里·福尔韦尔(Jerry Falwell)所说,基督教保守派之所以采取行动,是因为他们觉得这个国家“实际上是在把上帝赶出公共广场”。当然,在这中间还有罗伊诉韦德案。”因此,罗伯茨法院上个任期的两项判决代表了基督教右翼数十年来的奉献工作的高潮。这两个案例分别是多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization)和肯尼迪诉布雷默顿学区案(Kennedy v. Bremerton School District)。前者推翻了国家堕胎权,后者是根据宪法第一修正案,涉及一名高中教练被禁止在橄榄球赛后在球场上带领祈祷。就像多布斯一样,布雷默顿是数十年来在建立制度和看待世界的方式方面的投资的产物,这些都标志着基督教右翼的崛起。此外,这种对制度和理念的投资已经成功地形成了一种独特的基督教右翼世界观——一种以身份为中心的世界观
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.