Multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based reverse line blot hybridization to detect pathogens causing neonatal bacterial meningitis and relevant drug resistance genes

Q4 Medicine
Jinjing Zhang, Yajuan Wang
{"title":"Multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based reverse line blot hybridization to detect pathogens causing neonatal bacterial meningitis and relevant drug resistance genes","authors":"Jinjing Zhang, Yajuan Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2019.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the performance of multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based reverse line blot hybridization (mPCR/RLB) in the detection of pathogens causing neonatal bacterial meningitis and associated drug resistance genes. \n \n \nMethods \nClinical data and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected retrospectively from 80 cases diagnosed with neonatal bacterial meningitis in Beijing Children's Hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. A total of 100 CSF samples were obtained including 80 samples collected after admission (12 before and 68 after antibiotic treatment) and 20 recollected at follow-up. All CSF samples were analyzed by conventional culture, susceptibility test and mPCR/RLB. Differences in the detection of pathogens and drug resistance genes were analyzed by Chi-square test. \n \n \nResults \n(1) Among the 80 first-collected CSF samples, mPCR/RLB revealed significantly higher positive rate than conventional culture [26.3% (21/80) vs 7.5% (6/80), χ2=10.025, P=0.002]. No significant difference was showed between the two methods in analyzing the 12 samples collected before antibiotic therapy (9/12 vs 5/12, χ2=1.543, P=0.214), while the positive rate in 68 samples collected after antibiotic intervention detected by mPCR/RLB was obviously higher than that by conventional culture [17.6% (12/68) vs 1.5% (1/68), χ2=13.176, P<0.001]. (2) Conventional culture results of the 20 samples collected during follow-up were all negative, but four were positive using mPCR/RLB, which were also positive previously. Furthermore, the results of both methods in previous detections were identical. (3) According to the conventional culture results, the pathogens were Escherichia coli (three cases), Group B Streptococcus (two cases) and Listeria monocytogenes (one case), while mPCR/RLB detected Escherichia coli (four cases), Group B Streptococcus (five cases), Listeria monocytogenes (four cases), Neisseria meningitidis (four cases), Haemophilus influenzae b (one case), Gram-negative bacteria (one case), Gram-positive bacteria (one case), and Listeria monocytogenes and Haemophilus influenzae b coinfection (one case) in 80 first-collected CSF samples. (4) Antibiotic susceptibility test showed that one Escherichia coli strain produced extended spectrum beta-lactamases. Drug resistance gene detection by mPCR/RLB showed that acrA, acrB, CTX-M (consistent with antibiotic susseptibility test) and TetM genes were positive in three, two, one and one case, respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nmPCR/RLB is of great clinical value due to its higher detection rate and better accuracy compared with bacterial culture and can also detect drug resistance genes. \n \n \nKey words: \nMeningitis, bacterial; beta-Lactamases; Multiplex polymerase chain reaction; Nucleic acid hybridization; Drug resistance, bacterial; Infant, newborn","PeriodicalId":52320,"journal":{"name":"中华围产医学杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"774-780"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华围产医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2019.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the performance of multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based reverse line blot hybridization (mPCR/RLB) in the detection of pathogens causing neonatal bacterial meningitis and associated drug resistance genes. Methods Clinical data and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected retrospectively from 80 cases diagnosed with neonatal bacterial meningitis in Beijing Children's Hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. A total of 100 CSF samples were obtained including 80 samples collected after admission (12 before and 68 after antibiotic treatment) and 20 recollected at follow-up. All CSF samples were analyzed by conventional culture, susceptibility test and mPCR/RLB. Differences in the detection of pathogens and drug resistance genes were analyzed by Chi-square test. Results (1) Among the 80 first-collected CSF samples, mPCR/RLB revealed significantly higher positive rate than conventional culture [26.3% (21/80) vs 7.5% (6/80), χ2=10.025, P=0.002]. No significant difference was showed between the two methods in analyzing the 12 samples collected before antibiotic therapy (9/12 vs 5/12, χ2=1.543, P=0.214), while the positive rate in 68 samples collected after antibiotic intervention detected by mPCR/RLB was obviously higher than that by conventional culture [17.6% (12/68) vs 1.5% (1/68), χ2=13.176, P<0.001]. (2) Conventional culture results of the 20 samples collected during follow-up were all negative, but four were positive using mPCR/RLB, which were also positive previously. Furthermore, the results of both methods in previous detections were identical. (3) According to the conventional culture results, the pathogens were Escherichia coli (three cases), Group B Streptococcus (two cases) and Listeria monocytogenes (one case), while mPCR/RLB detected Escherichia coli (four cases), Group B Streptococcus (five cases), Listeria monocytogenes (four cases), Neisseria meningitidis (four cases), Haemophilus influenzae b (one case), Gram-negative bacteria (one case), Gram-positive bacteria (one case), and Listeria monocytogenes and Haemophilus influenzae b coinfection (one case) in 80 first-collected CSF samples. (4) Antibiotic susceptibility test showed that one Escherichia coli strain produced extended spectrum beta-lactamases. Drug resistance gene detection by mPCR/RLB showed that acrA, acrB, CTX-M (consistent with antibiotic susseptibility test) and TetM genes were positive in three, two, one and one case, respectively. Conclusions mPCR/RLB is of great clinical value due to its higher detection rate and better accuracy compared with bacterial culture and can also detect drug resistance genes. Key words: Meningitis, bacterial; beta-Lactamases; Multiplex polymerase chain reaction; Nucleic acid hybridization; Drug resistance, bacterial; Infant, newborn
基于多重聚合酶链式反应的反向线杂交检测新生儿细菌性脑膜炎病原体及相关耐药基因
目的评价基于多重聚合酶链反应的逆行杂交技术(mPCR/RLB)在新生儿细菌性脑膜炎病原菌及相关耐药基因检测中的应用价值。方法回顾性收集2012年1月1日至2018年12月31日北京儿童医院诊断为新生儿细菌性脑膜炎的80例患儿的临床资料和脑脊液样本。共采集脑脊液样本100份,其中入院后采集80份(抗生素治疗前12份,抗生素治疗后68份),随访时收集20份。所有脑脊液标本经常规培养、药敏试验和mPCR/RLB分析。采用卡方检验分析病原菌和耐药基因检测的差异。结果(1)首次采集的80份脑脊液标本中,mPCR/RLB阳性率显著高于常规培养[26.3% (21/80)vs 7.5% (6/80), χ2=10.025, P=0.002]。在抗生素治疗前采集的12份样本中,两种方法的检出率差异无统计学意义(9/12 vs 5/12, χ2=1.543, P=0.214),而抗生素干预后采集的68份样本中,mPCR/RLB检出率明显高于常规培养[17.6% (12/68)vs 1.5% (1/68), χ2=13.176, P<0.001]。(2)随访中采集的20份样本,常规培养结果均为阴性,但mPCR/RLB培养结果为阳性的4份样本,此前均为阳性。此外,两种方法在以往的检测结果是相同的。(3)常规培养结果检出病原菌为大肠埃希菌(3例)、B群链球菌(2例)、单核增生李斯特菌(1例),而mPCR/RLB检出大肠埃希菌(4例)、B群链球菌(5例)、单核增生李斯特菌(4例)、脑膜炎奈瑟菌(4例)、流感嗜血杆菌B(1例)、革兰氏阴性菌(1例)、革兰氏阳性菌(1例)、革兰氏阴性菌(1例)、革兰氏阳性菌(1例)。80份首次采集的脑脊液样本中单核细胞增生李斯特菌和流感嗜血杆菌b型共感染(1例)。(4)药敏试验表明,1株大肠杆菌产生广谱β -内酰胺酶。mPCR/RLB耐药基因检测结果显示,acrA、acrB、CTX-M(与药敏试验一致)和TetM基因分别阳性3例、2例、1例和1例。结论与细菌培养相比,mPCR/RLB具有较高的检出率和较好的准确性,并可检测耐药基因,具有重要的临床应用价值。关键词:脑膜炎;细菌性脑膜炎;beta-Lactamases;多重聚合酶链反应;核酸杂交;耐药,细菌;婴儿,新生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华围产医学杂志
中华围产医学杂志 Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4446
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine was founded in May 1998. It is one of the journals of the Chinese Medical Association, which is supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association, and hosted by Peking University First Hospital. Perinatal medicine is a new discipline jointly studied by obstetrics and neonatology. The purpose of this journal is to "prenatal and postnatal care, improve the quality of the newborn population, and ensure the safety and health of mothers and infants". It reflects the new theories, new technologies, and new progress in perinatal medicine in related disciplines such as basic, clinical and preventive medicine, genetics, and sociology. It aims to provide a window and platform for academic exchanges, information transmission, and understanding of the development trends of domestic and foreign perinatal medicine for the majority of perinatal medicine workers in my country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信