Estereotipos de género, maternidad y empleo: un análisis psicosociológico

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alicia Garrido-Luque, José Luis Álvaro-Estramiana, Ana Raquel Rosas-Torres
{"title":"Estereotipos de género, maternidad y empleo: un análisis psicosociológico","authors":"Alicia Garrido-Luque, José Luis Álvaro-Estramiana, Ana Raquel Rosas-Torres","doi":"10.16925/PE.V14I23.2261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the last decades there has been a substantial change in the position of women in the labor market, although it cannot yet be said that there is an equal share of jobs between men and women. On the one hand, there are still clear indications of employment discrimination against women and, on the other hand, the participation of men in domestic work has not grown at the same rate as that of women in paid work.Objective: To reflect on the ideological bases supporting this inequality by analyzing the weight that traditional gender stereotypes, especially those built around motherhood, have on the career of young women.Method: Data come from a qualitative study in which a sample of young people with different positions within the labor market was interviewed.Results: Generally, the discourses on maternity and upbringing are characterized by a marked biological and psychological essentialism that attributes a greater natural capacity for the care of children to women.Conclusions: Gender stereotypes that are built around motherhood are one of the main ideological factors that maintain discrimination against women in the labor market.","PeriodicalId":53843,"journal":{"name":"Pensando Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensando Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/PE.V14I23.2261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: In the last decades there has been a substantial change in the position of women in the labor market, although it cannot yet be said that there is an equal share of jobs between men and women. On the one hand, there are still clear indications of employment discrimination against women and, on the other hand, the participation of men in domestic work has not grown at the same rate as that of women in paid work.Objective: To reflect on the ideological bases supporting this inequality by analyzing the weight that traditional gender stereotypes, especially those built around motherhood, have on the career of young women.Method: Data come from a qualitative study in which a sample of young people with different positions within the labor market was interviewed.Results: Generally, the discourses on maternity and upbringing are characterized by a marked biological and psychological essentialism that attributes a greater natural capacity for the care of children to women.Conclusions: Gender stereotypes that are built around motherhood are one of the main ideological factors that maintain discrimination against women in the labor market.
性别、母亲和就业的刻板印象:心理社会学分析
导言:在过去的几十年里,妇女在劳动力市场上的地位发生了重大变化,尽管还不能说男女之间的工作份额是平等的。一方面,仍然有明显的迹象表明对妇女的就业歧视,另一方面,男子参与家务劳动的增长速度不如妇女参与有偿工作的增长速度。目的:通过分析传统的性别刻板印象,特别是围绕母亲的刻板印象对年轻女性职业生涯的影响,反思支持这种不平等的思想基础。方法:数据来自一项定性研究,其中对劳动力市场中不同职位的年轻人进行了采访。结果:一般来说,关于母性和养育的话语具有明显的生物学和心理学本质主义的特征,认为妇女具有更大的照顾儿童的自然能力。结论:围绕母性建立的性别刻板印象是维持劳动力市场对女性歧视的主要意识形态因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pensando Psicologia
Pensando Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信