Abundance, cover use, and clustering of brown trout spawning redds during stream habitat rehabilitation

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Neal D. Mundahl, Avery C. Schnaser
{"title":"Abundance, cover use, and clustering of brown trout spawning redds during stream habitat rehabilitation","authors":"Neal D. Mundahl,&nbsp;Avery C. Schnaser","doi":"10.1111/eff.12731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Abundance, placement beneath cover and clustering of brown trout spawning redds were monitored throughout five spawning seasons (2016–2020) in a 4.8-km reach of a Minnesota coldwater stream to assess the potential impacts of concurrent stream habitat rehabilitation projects. We anticipated that redd abundance (redds/100 m stream segments) and placement beneath cover (e.g. logs and branches, boulders, overhanging bank vegetation, aquatic macrophytes) would increase and redd clustering (placement within 1.5 m of other redds) would decline as stream sections were rehabilitated. Repeated redd counts were conducted for the entire stream reach during each of the five spawning seasons, and redd cover and clustering were documented. Before-after comparison of impact (BACI) tests were used to compare redd abundances in control versus rehabilitated stream sections, and before-after distributional tests compared redd placement beneath cover and redd clustering within rehabilitated sections. In total, 1895 brown trout spawning redds were documented within the study reach during the five spawning seasons combined. Redd abundance increased nearly fivefold throughout the 5-year study period (from 3.5 to 15.5 redds/100 m), but no significant difference was detected in redd abundances between rehabilitated versus control stream sections. Redd placement beneath cover (63% beneath cover in total) also increased throughout the study, but at a rate nine to 45 times greater in stream sections rehabilitated during the study than in control or previously rehabilitated sections. Redd clustering remained unchanged (5-year means = 35 to 46% of all redds clustered) in rehabilitated sections, but increased significantly through time (0% to 35%) in the control section. Stream habitat rehabilitation did not increase spawning redd abundance or reduce redd clustering in rehabilitated stream sections, but redd placement beneath cover increased after rehabilitation to levels present in other stream sections.</p>","PeriodicalId":11422,"journal":{"name":"Ecology of Freshwater Fish","volume":"32 4","pages":"902-915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology of Freshwater Fish","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eff.12731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abundance, placement beneath cover and clustering of brown trout spawning redds were monitored throughout five spawning seasons (2016–2020) in a 4.8-km reach of a Minnesota coldwater stream to assess the potential impacts of concurrent stream habitat rehabilitation projects. We anticipated that redd abundance (redds/100 m stream segments) and placement beneath cover (e.g. logs and branches, boulders, overhanging bank vegetation, aquatic macrophytes) would increase and redd clustering (placement within 1.5 m of other redds) would decline as stream sections were rehabilitated. Repeated redd counts were conducted for the entire stream reach during each of the five spawning seasons, and redd cover and clustering were documented. Before-after comparison of impact (BACI) tests were used to compare redd abundances in control versus rehabilitated stream sections, and before-after distributional tests compared redd placement beneath cover and redd clustering within rehabilitated sections. In total, 1895 brown trout spawning redds were documented within the study reach during the five spawning seasons combined. Redd abundance increased nearly fivefold throughout the 5-year study period (from 3.5 to 15.5 redds/100 m), but no significant difference was detected in redd abundances between rehabilitated versus control stream sections. Redd placement beneath cover (63% beneath cover in total) also increased throughout the study, but at a rate nine to 45 times greater in stream sections rehabilitated during the study than in control or previously rehabilitated sections. Redd clustering remained unchanged (5-year means = 35 to 46% of all redds clustered) in rehabilitated sections, but increased significantly through time (0% to 35%) in the control section. Stream habitat rehabilitation did not increase spawning redd abundance or reduce redd clustering in rehabilitated stream sections, but redd placement beneath cover increased after rehabilitation to levels present in other stream sections.

溪流生境恢复过程中褐鳟产卵鱼群的丰度、覆盖物利用和聚集
在明尼苏达州一条4.8公里长的冷水流中,监测了五个产卵季节(2016-2020年)褐鳟产卵区的丰度、覆盖下位置和聚集情况,以评估同步溪流栖息地恢复项目的潜在影响。我们预计,随着河流断面的恢复,redd丰度(redds/100 m河段)和覆盖下(如原木和树枝、巨石、悬岸植被、水生植物)的数量将增加,redd集群(放置在其他redd 1.5 m范围内)将减少。在五个产卵季节的每一个季节,对整个河流进行了重复的redd计数,并记录了redd的覆盖和聚集。使用前后影响比较(BACI)测试来比较对照和恢复河段的redd丰度,使用前后分布测试来比较覆盖下的redd放置和恢复河段内的redd聚集。在五个产卵季节的研究范围内,总共记录了1895条褐鳟产卵。在5年的研究期间,Redd丰度增加了近5倍(从3.5 redds/100米增加到15.5 redds/100米),但在恢复和控制的河流段之间没有发现显著差异。在整个研究过程中,覆盖下的Redd位置(总覆盖下的63%)也有所增加,但在研究期间恢复的河流区段的速度是对照或先前恢复的区段的9到45倍。恢复断面的Redd聚类保持不变(5年平均值=所有Redd聚类的35 - 46%),但随着时间的推移,对照断面的Redd聚类显著增加(0% - 35%)。在恢复后的河道中,河道生境恢复并没有增加红鱼的产卵丰度,也没有减少红鱼的聚集,但覆盖下的红鱼数量增加到其他河道的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology of Freshwater Fish
Ecology of Freshwater Fish 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology of Freshwater Fish publishes original contributions on all aspects of fish ecology in freshwater environments, including lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and streams. Manuscripts involving ecologically-oriented studies of behavior, conservation, development, genetics, life history, physiology, and host-parasite interactions are welcomed. Studies involving population ecology and community ecology are also of interest, as are evolutionary approaches including studies of population biology, evolutionary ecology, behavioral ecology, and historical ecology. Papers addressing the life stages of anadromous and catadromous species in estuaries and inshore coastal zones are considered if they contribute to the general understanding of freshwater fish ecology. Theoretical and modeling studies are suitable if they generate testable hypotheses, as are those with implications for fisheries. Manuscripts presenting analyses of published data are considered if they produce novel conclusions or syntheses. The journal publishes articles, fresh perspectives, and reviews and, occasionally, the proceedings of conferences and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信