The Association of Dietary Inflammatory Index with the Risk of Peptic Ulcer: A Case-Control Study

Q4 Medicine
Faezeh Fouladvand, M. Birjandi, Sadegh Amiri Kia, E. Falahi
{"title":"The Association of Dietary Inflammatory Index with the Risk of Peptic Ulcer: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Faezeh Fouladvand, M. Birjandi, Sadegh Amiri Kia, E. Falahi","doi":"10.18502/jnfs.v8i3.13288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a gastrointestinal ulcer caused by gastric acid. Aging, smoking and alcohol, stressful life, and family history are directly related to PUD. Oxidative stress and inflammation are the most important mechanisms involved in PUD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of dietary inflammatory index (DII) with the risk of PUD. \nMethods: In this case-control study, data from 100 newly diagnosed peptic ulcer patients and 150 healthy individuals were analyzed. DII was assessed based on dietary intake data collected through a 174-item validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). To calculate DII, 36 nutrients and food components were used after adjusting the energy intake. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) regarding the association between DII and PUD risk were estimated by logistic regression. \nResults: The mean DII score in patients (0.43±1.88) was significantly higher than the mean DII in healthy individuals (-2.88±2.00) (P=0.005), i.e. patients had received more inflammatory diet. In the crude model of PUD, odds increased significantly in the third and fourth quartiles of DII score compared to the lowest quartile (OR of third quartile vs first quartile: 2.65, 95% CI:1.27-5.52, respectively; and OR of fourth quartile vs first quartile: 2.33, 95% CI:1.12-4.85, respectively; P- trend=0.001). After checking multiple potential confounders, OR in third and fourth quartiles remained high and there was no change in the results. \nConclusions: These findings suggest that more pro-inflammatory diets, indicated by higher DII scores, may increase the risk of PUD. Therefore, anti-inflammatory diet may play a protective role against PUD.","PeriodicalId":32114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition and Food Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition and Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jnfs.v8i3.13288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a gastrointestinal ulcer caused by gastric acid. Aging, smoking and alcohol, stressful life, and family history are directly related to PUD. Oxidative stress and inflammation are the most important mechanisms involved in PUD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of dietary inflammatory index (DII) with the risk of PUD. Methods: In this case-control study, data from 100 newly diagnosed peptic ulcer patients and 150 healthy individuals were analyzed. DII was assessed based on dietary intake data collected through a 174-item validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). To calculate DII, 36 nutrients and food components were used after adjusting the energy intake. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) regarding the association between DII and PUD risk were estimated by logistic regression. Results: The mean DII score in patients (0.43±1.88) was significantly higher than the mean DII in healthy individuals (-2.88±2.00) (P=0.005), i.e. patients had received more inflammatory diet. In the crude model of PUD, odds increased significantly in the third and fourth quartiles of DII score compared to the lowest quartile (OR of third quartile vs first quartile: 2.65, 95% CI:1.27-5.52, respectively; and OR of fourth quartile vs first quartile: 2.33, 95% CI:1.12-4.85, respectively; P- trend=0.001). After checking multiple potential confounders, OR in third and fourth quartiles remained high and there was no change in the results. Conclusions: These findings suggest that more pro-inflammatory diets, indicated by higher DII scores, may increase the risk of PUD. Therefore, anti-inflammatory diet may play a protective role against PUD.
饮食炎症指数与消化性溃疡风险的关系:一项病例对照研究
背景:消化性溃疡病(PUD)是由胃酸引起的一种胃肠道溃疡。年龄、吸烟、饮酒、生活压力大、家族史与PUD有直接关系。氧化应激和炎症是PUD最重要的机制。本研究的目的是评估饮食炎症指数(DII)与PUD风险的关系。方法:在本病例对照研究中,分析了100例新诊断的消化性溃疡患者和150名健康人的资料。DII是根据膳食摄入数据进行评估的,这些数据是通过174项经过验证的食物频率问卷(FFQ)收集的。在调整能量摄入后,使用36种营养素和食物成分计算DII。通过逻辑回归估计DII和PUD风险之间的校正优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:患者的平均DII评分(0.43±1.88)明显高于健康人群的平均DII评分(-2.88±2.00)(P=0.005),即患者接受了更多的炎症性饮食。在PUD的粗模型中,与最低四分位数相比,DII评分的第三和第四四分位数的赔率显著增加(第三四分位数与第一四分位数的OR分别为2.65,95% CI分别为1.27-5.52;第四四分位数与第一四分位数的OR分别为2.33,95% CI为1.12-4.85;P -趋势= 0.001)。在检查了多个潜在混杂因素后,第三和第四个四分位数的OR仍然很高,结果没有变化。结论:这些发现表明,较高的DII评分表明,更多的促炎饮食可能会增加PUD的风险。因此,抗炎饮食可能对PUD有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition and Food Security
Journal of Nutrition and Food Security Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信