Validity of an Inertial Measurement Unit System to Assess Lower-limb Kinematics during a Maximal Linear Deceleration

Q4 Health Professions
Alastair Jordan, H. Carson, Brett Wilkie, Damian J. Harper
{"title":"Validity of an Inertial Measurement Unit System to Assess Lower-limb Kinematics during a Maximal Linear Deceleration","authors":"Alastair Jordan, H. Carson, Brett Wilkie, Damian J. Harper","doi":"10.18276/cej.2021.1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the validity of an inertial measurement unit system for measuring lower-26 limb joint kinematics during linear decelerations. A male team athlete (age 36 years, stature 27 1.75 m, mass 80.0 kg) performed multiple linear decelerations, following 20 m runs at 50%, 28 75% and 100% self-perceived effort. Inertial measurement unit sensors were strapped to 29 lower-limb segments and retroreflective markers were adhered to the lower-limbs for 3D 30 optical motion analysis. Ground contact time, foot to centre of mass displacement (foot-31 COM), peak and minimum angle, mean angular velocity and range of motion at the ankle, 32 knee and hip during the contact phases of each deceleration were determined. Measures were 33 valid if a very large correlation (r ≥ 0.7) and small bias (effect size < 0.6) were evident. 34 Following 50% effort, ground contact time, foot-COM and most hip and knee kinematics 35 were valid. Ground contact time, foot-COM and knee flexion velocity and range of motion 36 were valid following 75% efforts. Ground contact time and knee flexion velocity were valid 37 following 100% effort. Therefore, the inertial measurement unit system tested can be used to 38 assess temporal-spatial parameters during a deceleration regardless of the preceding effort, 39 and hip and knee kinematics following low intensity running.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2021.1-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined the validity of an inertial measurement unit system for measuring lower-26 limb joint kinematics during linear decelerations. A male team athlete (age 36 years, stature 27 1.75 m, mass 80.0 kg) performed multiple linear decelerations, following 20 m runs at 50%, 28 75% and 100% self-perceived effort. Inertial measurement unit sensors were strapped to 29 lower-limb segments and retroreflective markers were adhered to the lower-limbs for 3D 30 optical motion analysis. Ground contact time, foot to centre of mass displacement (foot-31 COM), peak and minimum angle, mean angular velocity and range of motion at the ankle, 32 knee and hip during the contact phases of each deceleration were determined. Measures were 33 valid if a very large correlation (r ≥ 0.7) and small bias (effect size < 0.6) were evident. 34 Following 50% effort, ground contact time, foot-COM and most hip and knee kinematics 35 were valid. Ground contact time, foot-COM and knee flexion velocity and range of motion 36 were valid following 75% efforts. Ground contact time and knee flexion velocity were valid 37 following 100% effort. Therefore, the inertial measurement unit system tested can be used to 38 assess temporal-spatial parameters during a deceleration regardless of the preceding effort, 39 and hip and knee kinematics following low intensity running.
惯性测量单元系统在最大线性减速时评估下肢运动的有效性
本研究检验了惯性测量单元系统在线性减速过程中测量下肢关节运动学的有效性。一名男子团队运动员(年龄36岁,身高27.1.75米,体重80.0公斤)在以50%、28.75%和100%的自我感觉努力跑完20米后,进行了多次线性减速。将惯性测量单元传感器绑在29个下肢节段上,并将反光标记贴在下肢上进行3D 30光学运动分析。在每次减速的接触阶段,确定了地面接触时间、脚到质心的位移(foot-31COM)、峰值和最小角度、平均角速度以及脚踝、32膝盖和臀部的运动范围。如果相关性非常大(r≥0.7)和偏倚较小(效应大小<0.6)明显,则33项测量有效。34经过50%的努力,地面接触时间、足部COM和大多数髋关节和膝关节运动学35是有效的。地面接触时间、足COM和膝关节屈曲速度以及运动范围36在75%的努力后是有效的。地面接触时间和膝关节屈曲速度在100%努力后有效37。因此,所测试的惯性测量单元系统可用于38评估减速期间的时间-空间参数,而不管先前的努力,39以及低强度跑步后的髋关节和膝关节运动学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信