Key residential construction defects: a framework for their identification and correlated causes

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
R. Lambers, F. Lamari, M. Skitmore, Darmicka Rajendra
{"title":"Key residential construction defects: a framework for their identification and correlated causes","authors":"R. Lambers, F. Lamari, M. Skitmore, Darmicka Rajendra","doi":"10.1108/ci-05-2022-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nConstruction defects are one of the primary causes of deficient quality performance and constantly yield project cost and schedule overruns mostly because of rework. This study aims to propose a new method for identifying a bespoke checklist of the most recurrent defects in residential construction work and their correlated causes as a basis for developing a framework for practical improvements in managing defect risks.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA literature review was first used to ground the defects within the existing theory and develop a new framework for ranking the key defects involved. This was demonstrated and tested by an analysis of Queensland Building Construction Commission (QBCC) archival data for 42,000 reported defects in new Queensland residential buildings. A questionnaire survey of 427 construction practitioners from 37 trades was then conducted to determine their causes.\n\n\nFindings\nThe developed framework consists of preconditions for defective acts, defective supervision and organizational influences and is found to be suitable for analyzing the QBCC archives to rank the 20 most frequent defects. In the demonstration study, a questionnaire survey identified the highest frequency latent causes of defective acts to be workers taking shortcuts to complete tasks, workers’ lack of skill or knowledge level, challenges and limitations of technical constructability, and incorrect material supply; the failure to correct a known problem and poor supervision for defective supervision; and inadequate employee training, low managerial priority for quality and high time pressure and constraints for organizational influences.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe method is a new approach to identifying the key defects in residential construction work and their correlated causes for developing bespoke checklists as an aid to in managing defect risks.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-05-2022-0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Construction defects are one of the primary causes of deficient quality performance and constantly yield project cost and schedule overruns mostly because of rework. This study aims to propose a new method for identifying a bespoke checklist of the most recurrent defects in residential construction work and their correlated causes as a basis for developing a framework for practical improvements in managing defect risks. Design/methodology/approach A literature review was first used to ground the defects within the existing theory and develop a new framework for ranking the key defects involved. This was demonstrated and tested by an analysis of Queensland Building Construction Commission (QBCC) archival data for 42,000 reported defects in new Queensland residential buildings. A questionnaire survey of 427 construction practitioners from 37 trades was then conducted to determine their causes. Findings The developed framework consists of preconditions for defective acts, defective supervision and organizational influences and is found to be suitable for analyzing the QBCC archives to rank the 20 most frequent defects. In the demonstration study, a questionnaire survey identified the highest frequency latent causes of defective acts to be workers taking shortcuts to complete tasks, workers’ lack of skill or knowledge level, challenges and limitations of technical constructability, and incorrect material supply; the failure to correct a known problem and poor supervision for defective supervision; and inadequate employee training, low managerial priority for quality and high time pressure and constraints for organizational influences. Originality/value The method is a new approach to identifying the key defects in residential construction work and their correlated causes for developing bespoke checklists as an aid to in managing defect risks.
住宅建筑主要缺陷的识别框架及其相关原因
目的施工缺陷是质量性能不足的主要原因之一,经常导致项目成本和进度超支,主要是因为返工。本研究旨在提出一种新的方法,用于确定住宅建筑工程中最常见缺陷及其相关原因的定制清单,作为制定缺陷风险管理实际改进框架的基础。设计/方法/方法首先使用文献综述来确定现有理论中的缺陷,并开发一个新的框架来对所涉及的关键缺陷进行排序。昆士兰建筑建设委员会(QBCC)对42000个报告的昆士兰新住宅缺陷的档案数据进行了分析,证明并测试了这一点。然后对来自37个行业的427名建筑从业者进行了问卷调查,以确定他们的原因。发现所开发的框架由缺陷行为、缺陷监督和组织影响的先决条件组成,适用于分析QBCC档案,对20个最常见的缺陷进行排名。在示范研究中,一项问卷调查确定了缺陷行为最常见的潜在原因是工人走捷径完成任务、工人缺乏技能或知识水平、技术可施工性的挑战和限制以及不正确的材料供应;未纠正已知问题,监督不力;员工培训不足,管理层对质量的重视程度低,时间压力大,组织影响力受到限制。独创性/价值该方法是一种新的方法,用于识别住宅建筑工程中的关键缺陷及其相关原因,以制定定制清单,帮助管理缺陷风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信