Discrepancy between preoperative endometrial sampling and hysterectomy diagnosis in endometrial cancer

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sanele E Mhlongo, T. Naidoo, Bongumusa S Makhathini
{"title":"Discrepancy between preoperative endometrial sampling and hysterectomy diagnosis in endometrial cancer","authors":"Sanele E Mhlongo, T. Naidoo, Bongumusa S Makhathini","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling histology type and tumour grade results compared with the final postoperative diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective chart audit of patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia admitted to Grey’s Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, from January 2013 to December 2017. Results: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. For endometrial cancer histological types, the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling was 94.7% (36/38) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 42.9% (3/7) for serous papillary carcinoma, 85.7% (6/7) for carcinosarcoma and 75% (9/12) for atypical hyperplasia. A kappa value of 0.825 was obtained with a p-value of 0.000 for agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and the final postoperative diagnosis. For endometrioid adenocarcinoma tumour grading 1–3 (G1–3), only 16/38 (42.1%) patients met the criteria to compare the pre- and postoperative results, which were as follows: of the eight patients with grade 1 tumour on preoperative sampling one patient (1.25%) was upgraded to grade 2 tumour postoperatively. There were no changes in tumour grading for grade 2 and 3 tumours, 3/3 and 5/5 respectively. Conclusion: Our study results for endometrioid adenocarcinoma are comparable to previous literature. However, there were significant discrepancies for non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Deficiencies that need to be addressed by laboratories in order to improve both preoperative surgical staging and postoperative adjuvant therapy planning were also highlighted.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":"13 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling histology type and tumour grade results compared with the final postoperative diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective chart audit of patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia admitted to Grey’s Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, from January 2013 to December 2017. Results: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. For endometrial cancer histological types, the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling was 94.7% (36/38) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 42.9% (3/7) for serous papillary carcinoma, 85.7% (6/7) for carcinosarcoma and 75% (9/12) for atypical hyperplasia. A kappa value of 0.825 was obtained with a p-value of 0.000 for agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and the final postoperative diagnosis. For endometrioid adenocarcinoma tumour grading 1–3 (G1–3), only 16/38 (42.1%) patients met the criteria to compare the pre- and postoperative results, which were as follows: of the eight patients with grade 1 tumour on preoperative sampling one patient (1.25%) was upgraded to grade 2 tumour postoperatively. There were no changes in tumour grading for grade 2 and 3 tumours, 3/3 and 5/5 respectively. Conclusion: Our study results for endometrioid adenocarcinoma are comparable to previous literature. However, there were significant discrepancies for non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Deficiencies that need to be addressed by laboratories in order to improve both preoperative surgical staging and postoperative adjuvant therapy planning were also highlighted.
子宫内膜癌术前子宫内膜取样与子宫切除术诊断的差异
背景:一项研究旨在确定术前子宫内膜取样组织学类型和肿瘤分级结果与术后最终诊断的准确性。方法:这是对2013年1月至2017年12月南非彼得马里茨堡格雷医院收治的子宫内膜癌症和非典型增生患者的回顾性图表审计。结果:60例患者符合入选标准。对于子宫内膜癌症组织学类型,子宫内膜样腺癌术前子宫内膜取样的准确率为94.7%(36/38),浆液性乳头状癌为42.9%(3/7),癌肉瘤为85.7%(6/7),非典型增生为75%(9/12)。kappa值为0.825,p值为0.000,表示术前子宫内膜取样与术后最终诊断之间的一致性。对于子宫内膜样腺癌1-3级(G1-3)肿瘤,只有16/38(42.1%)患者符合比较术前和术后结果的标准,结果如下:在术前取样的8名1级肿瘤患者中,有1名患者(1.25%)术后升级为2级肿瘤。2级和3级肿瘤的肿瘤分级没有变化,分别为3/3和5/5。结论:我们对子宫内膜样腺癌的研究结果与以前的文献相当。然而,非子宫内膜样腺癌存在显著差异。还强调了实验室需要解决的缺陷,以改进术前手术分期和术后辅助治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信