Detrended cross-correlations analysis between oil shocks and world food prices

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Khaled Mokni
{"title":"Detrended cross-correlations analysis between oil shocks and world food prices","authors":"Khaled Mokni","doi":"10.1108/ijesm-10-2021-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the relationship between oil price shocks and world food prices between 1974 and 2018.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors use the SVAR model to disentangle the oil price into supply, aggregate demand and oil-specific demand shocks and apply the detrended cross-correlations analysis to measure the association between oil price shocks and food returns/volatility and analyze contagion effects between oil and food markets.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that the correlations between oil and food prices depend on whether oil prices changes are driven by supply or demand shocks. Particularly, food returns (volatility) are positively (negatively) more dependent on the oil price changes driven by aggregate demand (oil specific demand) shocks. Further analysis dealing with contagion analysis between oil and food markets shows a contagion effect during the food crisis of 2006–2008. Oil-specific demand shocks are the main source of this phenomenon.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study differentiates itself from the previous literature by simultaneously disentangling oil price into supply, aggregate demand and oil-specific demand-driven shocks and evaluating the cross-correlations between each shock type and food returns/volatility. Specifically, this study has the originality of detecting the main source of contagion effects between oil and food markets over the food crisis of 2006–2008.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results of this study are important for policymakers and investors. They should account for the oil price fluctuations differently depending on whether the oil price shocks are driven by the demand or supply side. Moreover, they should anticipate an increase (decrease) in food prices due to a positive (negative) oil shock. In addition, special attention should be accorded to the world oil demand. Finally, when a food crisis occurs, markets operators should focus more on the specific oil-demand shocks, as it is the most contributor to possible contagion effects between oil and food markets.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study differentiates itself from the previous literature by simultaneously disentangling oil price into supply, aggregate demand and oil-specific demand-driven shocks and evaluating the cross-correlations between each shock type and food returns/volatility. Specifically, this study has the originality of detecting the main source of contagion effects between oil and food markets over the food crisis of 2006–2008.\n","PeriodicalId":46430,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Sector Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm-10-2021-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the relationship between oil price shocks and world food prices between 1974 and 2018. Design/methodology/approach The authors use the SVAR model to disentangle the oil price into supply, aggregate demand and oil-specific demand shocks and apply the detrended cross-correlations analysis to measure the association between oil price shocks and food returns/volatility and analyze contagion effects between oil and food markets. Findings The results show that the correlations between oil and food prices depend on whether oil prices changes are driven by supply or demand shocks. Particularly, food returns (volatility) are positively (negatively) more dependent on the oil price changes driven by aggregate demand (oil specific demand) shocks. Further analysis dealing with contagion analysis between oil and food markets shows a contagion effect during the food crisis of 2006–2008. Oil-specific demand shocks are the main source of this phenomenon. Research limitations/implications This study differentiates itself from the previous literature by simultaneously disentangling oil price into supply, aggregate demand and oil-specific demand-driven shocks and evaluating the cross-correlations between each shock type and food returns/volatility. Specifically, this study has the originality of detecting the main source of contagion effects between oil and food markets over the food crisis of 2006–2008. Practical implications The results of this study are important for policymakers and investors. They should account for the oil price fluctuations differently depending on whether the oil price shocks are driven by the demand or supply side. Moreover, they should anticipate an increase (decrease) in food prices due to a positive (negative) oil shock. In addition, special attention should be accorded to the world oil demand. Finally, when a food crisis occurs, markets operators should focus more on the specific oil-demand shocks, as it is the most contributor to possible contagion effects between oil and food markets. Originality/value This study differentiates itself from the previous literature by simultaneously disentangling oil price into supply, aggregate demand and oil-specific demand-driven shocks and evaluating the cross-correlations between each shock type and food returns/volatility. Specifically, this study has the originality of detecting the main source of contagion effects between oil and food markets over the food crisis of 2006–2008.
石油冲击与世界粮食价格的趋势互相关分析
目的研究1974年至2018年石油价格冲击与世界粮食价格之间的关系。设计/方法/方法作者使用SVAR模型将石油价格分解为供应,总需求和石油特定需求冲击,并应用去趋势互相关分析来衡量油价冲击与粮食回报/波动之间的关联,分析石油和粮食市场之间的传染效应。研究结果表明,石油和食品价格之间的相关性取决于石油价格的变化是由供应还是需求冲击驱动的。特别是,粮食回报(波动性)正(负)更依赖于总需求(石油特定需求)冲击驱动的油价变化。对石油和粮食市场之间的传染分析进行的进一步分析显示,2006-2007年粮食危机期间存在传染效应。石油特有的需求冲击是造成这种现象的主要原因。研究局限性/含义这项研究通过同时将油价分解为供应、总需求和石油特定需求驱动的冲击,并评估每种冲击类型与粮食回报/波动之间的交叉相关性,与以往文献有所不同。具体而言,这项研究的独创性在于检测了石油和粮食市场在2006-2007年粮食危机中传染效应的主要来源。实际意义这项研究结果对决策者和投资者都很重要。他们应该根据油价冲击是由需求还是供应驱动,对油价波动做出不同的解释。此外,他们应该预测到,由于积极(消极)的石油冲击,食品价格会上涨(下降)。此外,应特别关注世界石油需求。最后,当粮食危机发生时,市场运营商应该更多地关注特定的石油需求冲击,因为这是石油和粮食市场之间可能产生传染效应的最大因素。独创性/价值这项研究通过同时将油价分解为供应、总需求和石油特定需求驱动的冲击,并评估每种冲击类型与粮食回报/波动之间的交叉相关性,从而与以往的文献有所不同。具体而言,这项研究的独创性在于检测了2006–2008年粮食危机期间石油和粮食市场之间传染效应的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
22.60%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Sector Management aims to facilitate dissemination of research on issues relating to supply management (covering the entire supply chain of resource finding, extraction, production, treatment, conversion, transportation, distribution and retail supply), demand and usage management, waste management, customer and other stakeholder management, and solutions thereto. The journal covers all forms of energy (non-renewable and renewable), forms of supply (centralised or decentralised), ownership patterns (public or private, cooperative, joint, or any other), market structures (formal, informal, integrated, disintegrated, national, international, local, etc.) and degress of commoditisation (e.g. internationally traded, regionally traded, non-traded, etc.). The journal aims to cover a wide range of subjects relevant to the management of the energy sector, including but not limited to: Management of scarce resources (economic, financial, human and natural), projects, activities and concerns (e.g. regulatory, social and environmental aspects), technologies and knowledge Business strategy, policy and planning as well as decision support systems for energy sector management Business organisation, structure and environment, and changes thereto Globalisation and multi-cultural management Management of innovation, change and transition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信