Effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and recovery profile in children undergoing laparoscopic Stephen–Fowler's Stage-2 orchidopexy under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
AH Shruthi, G. Anuradha, Y. Chandrika
{"title":"Effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and recovery profile in children undergoing laparoscopic Stephen–Fowler's Stage-2 orchidopexy under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study","authors":"AH Shruthi, G. Anuradha, Y. Chandrika","doi":"10.4103/TheIAForum.TheIAForum_101_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stephen–Fowler's Stage-2 (SF-2) orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes poses the challenge of both laparoscopic and open urogenital surgery to the pediatric anesthesiologist. Balanced anesthesia supplemented with regional analgesia remains the standard technique adopted. Studies involving intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant anesthetic in children are sparse. Aims and Objectives: The aim and objective was to study the effect of IV dexmedetomidine on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, airway reflexes, and hemodynamic responses to extubation and postoperative analgesia. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on thirty children undergoing laparoscopic SF-2 repair to receive balanced anesthesia with isoflurane. Group D patients received IV dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus over 10 min after induction followed by an infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/h and Group C patients received regional analgesia. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation, agitation, pain scores, time to rescue analgesia, and time to discharge were documented. Results: A significant change was discernible in the heart rate and systolic blood pressure with intraoperative hemodynamic stability in Group D patients, which was comparable to baseline values. Smoother extubation with better hemodynamic stability (P < 0.001) and decreased agitation (P < 0.05) were noted in Group D patients. Children in Group C were observed to have lower sedation scores postoperatively (P < 0.05). Time to rescue analgesia was statistically significantly prolonged in Group D (P < 0.001) without any change in time to discharge from hospital. Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus followed by an infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h gives better intraoperative hemodynamic stability with smoother extubation and prolonged postoperative analgesia without undue side effects in children undergoing SF-2 orchidopexy.","PeriodicalId":42359,"journal":{"name":"Indian Anaesthetists Forum","volume":"22 1","pages":"17 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Anaesthetists Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/TheIAForum.TheIAForum_101_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stephen–Fowler's Stage-2 (SF-2) orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes poses the challenge of both laparoscopic and open urogenital surgery to the pediatric anesthesiologist. Balanced anesthesia supplemented with regional analgesia remains the standard technique adopted. Studies involving intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant anesthetic in children are sparse. Aims and Objectives: The aim and objective was to study the effect of IV dexmedetomidine on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, airway reflexes, and hemodynamic responses to extubation and postoperative analgesia. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on thirty children undergoing laparoscopic SF-2 repair to receive balanced anesthesia with isoflurane. Group D patients received IV dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus over 10 min after induction followed by an infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/h and Group C patients received regional analgesia. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation, agitation, pain scores, time to rescue analgesia, and time to discharge were documented. Results: A significant change was discernible in the heart rate and systolic blood pressure with intraoperative hemodynamic stability in Group D patients, which was comparable to baseline values. Smoother extubation with better hemodynamic stability (P < 0.001) and decreased agitation (P < 0.05) were noted in Group D patients. Children in Group C were observed to have lower sedation scores postoperatively (P < 0.05). Time to rescue analgesia was statistically significantly prolonged in Group D (P < 0.001) without any change in time to discharge from hospital. Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus followed by an infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h gives better intraoperative hemodynamic stability with smoother extubation and prolonged postoperative analgesia without undue side effects in children undergoing SF-2 orchidopexy.
右美托咪定对全麻下腹腔镜Stephen-Fowler二期兰管切除术患儿血流动力学和恢复的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
背景:Stephen-Fowler的二期(SF-2)高腹内睾丸睾丸切除术对儿科麻醉师提出了腹腔镜和开放泌尿生殖外科手术的挑战。平衡麻醉辅以局部镇痛仍然是采用的标准技术。涉及静脉注射右美托咪定作为儿童辅助麻醉剂的研究很少。目的和目的:目的和目的是研究静脉注射右美托咪定对术中血流动力学稳定性、气道反射以及拔管和术后镇痛的血流动力学反应的影响。材料和方法:本前瞻性随机对照研究对30名接受腹腔镜SF-2修复的儿童进行异氟醚平衡麻醉。D组患者诱导后10 min内静脉滴注右美托咪定1 μg/kg,再以0.5 μg/kg/h滴注,C组患者局部镇痛。记录血流动力学参数、镇静、躁动、疼痛评分、镇痛恢复时间和出院时间。结果:D组患者的心率、收缩压和术中血流动力学稳定性发生显著变化,与基线值相当。D组拔管更顺畅,血流动力学稳定性更好(P < 0.001),躁动减少(P < 0.05)。C组患儿术后镇静评分较低(P < 0.05)。D组镇痛恢复时间明显延长(P < 0.001),出院时间无明显变化。结论:静脉滴注右美托咪定1 μg/kg后再滴注0.5 μg/kg/h可使SF-2患儿术中血流动力学稳定,拔管顺畅,术后镇痛时间延长,无不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Anaesthetists Forum
Indian Anaesthetists Forum ANESTHESIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信