A Comparison of NCREIF, INREV, and ANREV Open-End Core Fund Indices

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Barrett A. Slade, J. Fisher, Joseph D'Alessandro
{"title":"A Comparison of NCREIF, INREV, and ANREV Open-End Core Fund Indices","authors":"Barrett A. Slade, J. Fisher, Joseph D'Alessandro","doi":"10.1080/10835547.2021.2003506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-border investment in non-listed real estate is on the rise. This article aims to compare the U.S. NFI-ODCE index with the European INREV ODCE index and the recently released Asian ANREV ODCE index with the hope that this study will be helpful to cross-border investors in these major mar- kets. From 2016 through 2020 (five years), we found that the NCREIF fund count remained relatively flat, but the INREV and ANREV fund count increase steadily. At the end of 2020, NCREIF ’ s GAV was 270 billion dollars compared with INREVs 39 billion dollars and ANREV ’ s 16 billion dollars, a considerable size difference between the U.S. and the other two. However, much smaller ANREV Gross Asset Value grew much faster. When we calculated the 12-month rolling returns for the respective regions, we found that ANREV realized a 12-month rolling total return of 7.59% compared with INREV at 5.52% and NCREIF at 5.28%. When looking at a longer time period of 4 1 = 2 years, we calculated a lower SHARP Ratio of 1.36 for ANREV compared to INREV at 2.28 and NCREIF at 2.32, demonstrating that INREV and NCREIF have similar and more favorable reward to risk ratios than ANREV. Further analysis found that the INREV and NCREIF ODCE indices are highly correlated, but we found that they were not cointegrated; therefore, we could not use one index to predict the values in the other. We encourage caution when generalizing these results since they are based on relatively short periods. It will be interesting to make these comparisons again when we have a long history of performance for the INREV and ANREV indices.","PeriodicalId":35895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2021.2003506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cross-border investment in non-listed real estate is on the rise. This article aims to compare the U.S. NFI-ODCE index with the European INREV ODCE index and the recently released Asian ANREV ODCE index with the hope that this study will be helpful to cross-border investors in these major mar- kets. From 2016 through 2020 (five years), we found that the NCREIF fund count remained relatively flat, but the INREV and ANREV fund count increase steadily. At the end of 2020, NCREIF ’ s GAV was 270 billion dollars compared with INREVs 39 billion dollars and ANREV ’ s 16 billion dollars, a considerable size difference between the U.S. and the other two. However, much smaller ANREV Gross Asset Value grew much faster. When we calculated the 12-month rolling returns for the respective regions, we found that ANREV realized a 12-month rolling total return of 7.59% compared with INREV at 5.52% and NCREIF at 5.28%. When looking at a longer time period of 4 1 = 2 years, we calculated a lower SHARP Ratio of 1.36 for ANREV compared to INREV at 2.28 and NCREIF at 2.32, demonstrating that INREV and NCREIF have similar and more favorable reward to risk ratios than ANREV. Further analysis found that the INREV and NCREIF ODCE indices are highly correlated, but we found that they were not cointegrated; therefore, we could not use one index to predict the values in the other. We encourage caution when generalizing these results since they are based on relatively short periods. It will be interesting to make these comparisons again when we have a long history of performance for the INREV and ANREV indices.
NCREIF、INREV和ANREV开放式核心基金指数的比较
非上市房地产跨境投资呈上升趋势。本文旨在将美国的NFI-ODCE指数与欧洲的INREV ODCE指数以及最近发布的亚洲ANREV ODCE指数进行比较,希望本研究对这些主要市场的跨境投资者有所帮助。从2016年到2020年(五年),我们发现NCREIF基金数量保持相对平稳,但INREV和ANREV基金数量稳步增加。截至2020年底,NCREIF的GAV为2700亿美元,而INREV为390亿美元,ANREV为160亿美元,这在美国和其他两个国家之间存在相当大的规模差异。然而,规模小得多的ANREV总资产价值增长得快得多。当我们计算各个地区的12个月滚动回报率时,我们发现ANREV实现了7.59%的12个个月滚动总回报率,而INREV为5.52%,NCREIF为5.28%。当考虑4 1=2年的较长时间段时,我们计算出ANREV的SHARP比率较低,为1.36,而INREV为2.28,NCREIF为2.32,表明INREV和NCREIF具有与ANREV相似且更有利的回报风险比。进一步分析发现,INREV和NCREIF ODCE指数高度相关,但我们发现它们不是协整的;因此,我们不能用一个指数来预测另一个指数的值。我们鼓励在概括这些结果时保持谨慎,因为它们是基于相对较短的时间。当我们对INREV和ANREV指数的表现有着悠久的历史时,再次进行这些比较将是一件有趣的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management
Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management (JREPM) is a publication of the American Real Estate Society (ARES). Its purpose is to disseminate applied research on real estate investment and portfolio management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信