Evaluating rudimentary prehistoric stone artifacts from the American southwest and Mexico

IF 1.1 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
J. Neely, S. Tomka
{"title":"Evaluating rudimentary prehistoric stone artifacts from the American southwest and Mexico","authors":"J. Neely, S. Tomka","doi":"10.2218/jls.4332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goals and background of this study are presented. A sample of rudimentary artifacts, recovered through survey and excavation from contexts in the American Southwest and southern Mexico, were physically examined to verify or reject their assumed validity as tools and their use in agricultural activities. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were undertaken on these often overlooked and misidentified artifacts to ascertain evidence of human manufacture and use-wear. The results of the study indicate the specimens represent three general form categories of tools that have uses related to excavation and earth moving. To augment this evidence, information was gathered regarding find contexts, historic records, and from relevant literature. The geographic find locations and contexts of the artifacts, as well as their temporal placement, and likely group affiliations, are then discussed. Evidence indicates that, although probably used for other purposes, these minimally-retouched, hand-held, digging and earth moving tools were used in the preparation and maintenance of agricultural fields and irrigation canals, and functioned to support the subsistence system from ca. 400-1450 CE. These implements evidently also held social and ceremonial values and functions. The rudimentary nature of these tools is often found not to be commensurate with the sophisticated complexity of the associated agricultural infrastructure. Initial, very tentative, hypotheses are presented for this incongruity.","PeriodicalId":44072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lithic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lithic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.4332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goals and background of this study are presented. A sample of rudimentary artifacts, recovered through survey and excavation from contexts in the American Southwest and southern Mexico, were physically examined to verify or reject their assumed validity as tools and their use in agricultural activities. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were undertaken on these often overlooked and misidentified artifacts to ascertain evidence of human manufacture and use-wear. The results of the study indicate the specimens represent three general form categories of tools that have uses related to excavation and earth moving. To augment this evidence, information was gathered regarding find contexts, historic records, and from relevant literature. The geographic find locations and contexts of the artifacts, as well as their temporal placement, and likely group affiliations, are then discussed. Evidence indicates that, although probably used for other purposes, these minimally-retouched, hand-held, digging and earth moving tools were used in the preparation and maintenance of agricultural fields and irrigation canals, and functioned to support the subsistence system from ca. 400-1450 CE. These implements evidently also held social and ceremonial values and functions. The rudimentary nature of these tools is often found not to be commensurate with the sophisticated complexity of the associated agricultural infrastructure. Initial, very tentative, hypotheses are presented for this incongruity.
评估来自美国西南部和墨西哥的原始史前石器
介绍了本研究的目的和背景。通过对美国西南部和墨西哥南部地区的调查和挖掘,我们找到了一些基本的人工制品样本,并对它们进行了物理检查,以验证或拒绝它们作为工具的有效性,以及它们在农业活动中的用途。对这些经常被忽视和错误识别的文物进行了宏观和微观检查,以确定人类制造和使用磨损的证据。研究结果表明,这些标本代表了三种与挖掘和土方有关的工具的一般形式类别。为了增强这一证据,收集了有关发现背景、历史记录和相关文献的信息。然后讨论了文物的地理位置和背景,以及它们的时间位置和可能的群体关系。有证据表明,尽管可能用于其他目的,但这些经过最小修饰的手持挖掘和移土工具被用于准备和维护农田和灌溉渠,并在大约400-1450年期间为维持生计系统发挥作用。这些工具显然也具有社会和仪式的价值和功能。人们常常发现,这些工具的初级性质与相关农业基础设施的复杂程度不相称。对于这种不一致,提出了初步的、非常试探性的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信