The Travails of Trumpification

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Zachary Wheeler
{"title":"The Travails of Trumpification","authors":"Zachary Wheeler","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2023.2178751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"nature of international capitalism that does not mention political parties even once and that assumes away cultural and group differences between consumers and workers at the ends of international supply chains by invoking common interests in freedom and justice strikes me as unconvincing. McKean would no doubt answer by doubting the capability of the ubiquitous sovereignty of states to deliver the results he wishes and by invoking the power of participation aimed at reducing injustice to change orientations. I would agree. I do not think that appeals to states to promote the outer limits of freedom are realistic either, especially across political boundaries. But the use of state power, pushed by political parties and social movements, is, I think, more likely to succeed than McKean’s less complicated vision. I also think such a combination is more likely to accomplish the disorientation from neoliberalism McKean wants. Disenthralling whole societies from the very real illusions of neoliberal freedom will take some long boring on very hard boards. I think it will take a combination of the dislocating experience of social movements and the consistent effort of democratic participation through political parties to attempt it. I should say a few final words about the effort that went into this book. I disagree with McKean about his final recommendations, but this is a substantial intellectual product. Indeed, I found his originality and rigor both stimulating and unsettling. I will have more thinking to do as a result of reading Disorienting Neoliberalism and it will lead me to reassess my initial responses to questions of social activism in the future. My guess is that, whatever our disagreements about strategy, McKean would be satisfied with such a result.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"193 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2178751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

nature of international capitalism that does not mention political parties even once and that assumes away cultural and group differences between consumers and workers at the ends of international supply chains by invoking common interests in freedom and justice strikes me as unconvincing. McKean would no doubt answer by doubting the capability of the ubiquitous sovereignty of states to deliver the results he wishes and by invoking the power of participation aimed at reducing injustice to change orientations. I would agree. I do not think that appeals to states to promote the outer limits of freedom are realistic either, especially across political boundaries. But the use of state power, pushed by political parties and social movements, is, I think, more likely to succeed than McKean’s less complicated vision. I also think such a combination is more likely to accomplish the disorientation from neoliberalism McKean wants. Disenthralling whole societies from the very real illusions of neoliberal freedom will take some long boring on very hard boards. I think it will take a combination of the dislocating experience of social movements and the consistent effort of democratic participation through political parties to attempt it. I should say a few final words about the effort that went into this book. I disagree with McKean about his final recommendations, but this is a substantial intellectual product. Indeed, I found his originality and rigor both stimulating and unsettling. I will have more thinking to do as a result of reading Disorienting Neoliberalism and it will lead me to reassess my initial responses to questions of social activism in the future. My guess is that, whatever our disagreements about strategy, McKean would be satisfied with such a result.
特朗普化的艰辛
国际资本主义的本质——一次也没有提到政党,通过援引自由和正义的共同利益,消除了国际供应链末端消费者和工人之间的文化和群体差异——让我觉得难以令人信服。毫无疑问,麦基恩会通过质疑无处不在的国家主权实现他所希望的结果的能力,并通过援引旨在减少不公正的参与力量来改变方向来回答这个问题。我同意。我也不认为呼吁各国促进自由的外部限制是现实的,尤其是跨越政治边界。但我认为,在政党和社会运动的推动下使用国家权力,比麦基恩不那么复杂的设想更有可能成功。我也认为这样的结合更有可能实现麦基恩想要的新自由主义的迷失方向。将整个社会从新自由主义自由的真实幻想中解脱出来,将需要很长时间的无聊。我认为这需要结合社会运动的混乱经验和通过政党进行民主参与的持续努力来尝试。我应该最后说几句写这本书所付出的努力。我不同意McKean的最后建议,但这是一个实质性的智力产品。的确,我发现他的独创性和严谨既令人兴奋又令人不安。由于阅读了《迷失方向的新自由主义》,我将有更多的思考要做,它将引导我重新评估我对未来社会行动主义问题的最初反应。我的猜测是,无论我们在战略上有什么分歧,麦基恩都会对这样的结果感到满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信