An Evaluation of the Competences and Attitudes of the Providers of an Evidence-Based Family Prevention Program

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Lidia Sánchez-Prieto, Carmen Orte Socias, Belén Pascual Barrio
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Competences and Attitudes of the Providers of an Evidence-Based Family Prevention Program","authors":"Lidia Sánchez-Prieto, Carmen Orte Socias, Belén Pascual Barrio","doi":"10.1177/10443894221130802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based family prevention programs have become more prevalent in recent years due to their effectiveness. However, they also pose a number of challenges, such as controlling for possible biases associated with the profile of the program provider. This study assesses whether the professionals in charge of implementing the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) have adequate competences, and whether significant groupings can be identified according to their competences and attitudes to evidence-based practice. It analyses what training and occupational factors might influence their competence levels and attitudes. Through a cross-sectional study, an evaluation was made of the professionals in charge of giving the SFP (n = 177; 84.2% females; mean age: 38 years). They were found to have sufficient levels of suitable competences, particularly in terms of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environment-related skills. From a K-means cluster analysis, significant groupings were identified, based on the professionals’ competences and attitudes to evidence-based practice. When the professionals in Cluster 2 (a higher level of competences and receptive attitudes) were compared with the other clusters, significant differences in two variables were found: (a) the receipt of prior training in the SFP and (b) specialization in family interventions. This finding is important because once the competences had been evaluated to control for possible biases, higher competence levels were shown to influence the program’s effectiveness. For this reason, it is important to identify possible factors that might foster better proficiency in the said skills. This could serve as a guideline for public health services, social agents, and institutions, offering them guidance on the type of competences and level of skills required by the professionals in charge of giving the program.","PeriodicalId":47463,"journal":{"name":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","volume":"104 1","pages":"125 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894221130802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Evidence-based family prevention programs have become more prevalent in recent years due to their effectiveness. However, they also pose a number of challenges, such as controlling for possible biases associated with the profile of the program provider. This study assesses whether the professionals in charge of implementing the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) have adequate competences, and whether significant groupings can be identified according to their competences and attitudes to evidence-based practice. It analyses what training and occupational factors might influence their competence levels and attitudes. Through a cross-sectional study, an evaluation was made of the professionals in charge of giving the SFP (n = 177; 84.2% females; mean age: 38 years). They were found to have sufficient levels of suitable competences, particularly in terms of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environment-related skills. From a K-means cluster analysis, significant groupings were identified, based on the professionals’ competences and attitudes to evidence-based practice. When the professionals in Cluster 2 (a higher level of competences and receptive attitudes) were compared with the other clusters, significant differences in two variables were found: (a) the receipt of prior training in the SFP and (b) specialization in family interventions. This finding is important because once the competences had been evaluated to control for possible biases, higher competence levels were shown to influence the program’s effectiveness. For this reason, it is important to identify possible factors that might foster better proficiency in the said skills. This could serve as a guideline for public health services, social agents, and institutions, offering them guidance on the type of competences and level of skills required by the professionals in charge of giving the program.
基于证据的家庭预防项目提供者的能力和态度评估
近年来,基于证据的家庭预防项目因其有效性而变得越来越普遍。然而,它们也提出了许多挑战,例如控制与程序提供者的配置文件相关的可能偏差。本研究评估负责实施强化家庭计划(SFP)的专业人员是否具有足够的能力,以及是否可以根据他们的能力和对循证实践的态度来确定重要的分组。分析了哪些培训和职业因素可能影响他们的能力水平和态度。通过横断面研究,对负责提供SFP的专业人员进行了评估(n = 177;84.2%的女性;平均年龄:38岁)。他们被发现具有足够水平的适当能力,特别是在人际关系、人际关系和与环境有关的技能方面。从k均值聚类分析中,根据专业人员的能力和对循证实践的态度,确定了显著的分组。当第2组的专业人员(能力和接受态度水平较高)与其他组进行比较时,发现两个变量存在显著差异:(a)先前接受SFP培训的情况和(b)家庭干预的专业化。这一发现很重要,因为一旦能力被评估以控制可能的偏差,更高的能力水平就会显示出对程序有效性的影响。由于这个原因,确定可能促进上述技能更熟练的因素是很重要的。这可以作为公共卫生服务机构、社会代理人和机构的指导方针,为他们提供关于负责实施该方案的专业人员所需的能力类型和技能水平的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信