Between Stalin and Dionysus: Bakhtin's Theory of the Carnival

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Boris Groys
{"title":"Between Stalin and Dionysus: Bakhtin's Theory of the Carnival","authors":"Boris Groys","doi":"10.5195/DPJ.2017.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay by Russian American philologist Boris Groys and nine commentaries followed by Groys’ reply to them in this special issue: “Deconstructing Bakhtin, Carnival with Evil”, present a provocative discussion about Bakhtin’s conceptual work and legacy for education and beyond. Boris Groys argued that Bakhtin embraced a dangerous play with Stalin’s totalitarianism through fusing art and life, prioritizing cosmic carnival over human rights and by being mesmerised by dionysian passions. The following nine commentaries, written by educationalists and non-educationalists, present a diverse spectrum of reactions to Groys’ criticism of Bakhtin: from passionate rejections to sympathetic acceptance seriously considering implications of Groys’ charges. The biggest implication for education is the relationship between the teacher and the student, specifically whether the teacher authors the student and the student’s education or not. The first commentary, written by Caryl Emerson provides a brilliant overview of all these diverse positions, in education and beyond. – DPJ Editors: Eugene Matusov and Ana Marjanovic-Shane","PeriodicalId":42140,"journal":{"name":"Dialogic Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogic Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/DPJ.2017.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The essay by Russian American philologist Boris Groys and nine commentaries followed by Groys’ reply to them in this special issue: “Deconstructing Bakhtin, Carnival with Evil”, present a provocative discussion about Bakhtin’s conceptual work and legacy for education and beyond. Boris Groys argued that Bakhtin embraced a dangerous play with Stalin’s totalitarianism through fusing art and life, prioritizing cosmic carnival over human rights and by being mesmerised by dionysian passions. The following nine commentaries, written by educationalists and non-educationalists, present a diverse spectrum of reactions to Groys’ criticism of Bakhtin: from passionate rejections to sympathetic acceptance seriously considering implications of Groys’ charges. The biggest implication for education is the relationship between the teacher and the student, specifically whether the teacher authors the student and the student’s education or not. The first commentary, written by Caryl Emerson provides a brilliant overview of all these diverse positions, in education and beyond. – DPJ Editors: Eugene Matusov and Ana Marjanovic-Shane
斯大林和酒神之间:巴赫金的狂欢论
俄裔美国语文学家鲍里斯·格罗斯的文章和九篇评论,以及格罗斯在本期特刊中对它们的回复:“解构巴赫金,与邪恶狂欢”,对巴赫金的概念性工作和教育及其他方面的遗产进行了挑衅性的讨论。鲍里斯·格罗斯(Boris Groys)认为,巴赫金通过融合艺术和生活,将宇宙狂欢置于人权之上,并被酒神般的激情所迷住,与斯大林的极权主义进行了一场危险的较量。以下九篇评论由教育家和非教育家撰写,对格罗斯对巴赫金的批评做出了不同的反应:从热情的拒绝到同情的接受,认真考虑格罗斯指控的影响。教育的最大含义是教师和学生之间的关系,特别是教师是否对学生和学生的教育进行了创作。Caryl Emerson撰写的第一篇评论对教育及其他领域的所有这些不同立场进行了精彩的概述民主党编辑:Eugene Matusov和Ana Marjanovic Shane
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogic Pedagogy
Dialogic Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信