Social norms and (de-)financialization: Japan’s and China’s divergent paths in consumer credit

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Fumihito Gotoh
{"title":"Social norms and (de-)financialization: Japan’s and China’s divergent paths in consumer credit","authors":"Fumihito Gotoh","doi":"10.1080/13569775.2021.1902055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the 1980s, American-led financialization promoting capital and labour mobility has influenced Asia, but the Japanese and Chinese trajectories in financialization of consumption (consumer credit development) have diverged, with the 1995–2013 contraction in Japan contrasting with the skyrocketing growth in China since 2010. I argue the divergence can be attributed to the varying levels of compatibility between American financial norms and their social norms, the different timings of their integration into the global economy (the influence of ‘embedded liberalism’ or neoliberalism), and the interests of key actors of each country. Anti-liberal Japanese elites reversed the financialization of consumption to preserve anti-capitalistic ‘industrious norms’ and strong attachments to intermediary organisations, which are the cornerstones of their dominance. In contrast, economic rationalism embedded in Chinese society since late imperial China, when capital and labour mobility was enhanced by removing fixed intermediary organisations considerably under autocracy, has facilitated China’s financialization of consumption.","PeriodicalId":51673,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Politics","volume":"27 1","pages":"397 - 418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13569775.2021.1902055","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1902055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since the 1980s, American-led financialization promoting capital and labour mobility has influenced Asia, but the Japanese and Chinese trajectories in financialization of consumption (consumer credit development) have diverged, with the 1995–2013 contraction in Japan contrasting with the skyrocketing growth in China since 2010. I argue the divergence can be attributed to the varying levels of compatibility between American financial norms and their social norms, the different timings of their integration into the global economy (the influence of ‘embedded liberalism’ or neoliberalism), and the interests of key actors of each country. Anti-liberal Japanese elites reversed the financialization of consumption to preserve anti-capitalistic ‘industrious norms’ and strong attachments to intermediary organisations, which are the cornerstones of their dominance. In contrast, economic rationalism embedded in Chinese society since late imperial China, when capital and labour mobility was enhanced by removing fixed intermediary organisations considerably under autocracy, has facilitated China’s financialization of consumption.
社会规范和(去)金融化:日本和中国消费信贷的不同路径
摘要自20世纪80年代以来,美国主导的促进资本和劳动力流动的金融化影响了亚洲,但日本和中国在消费金融化(消费信贷发展)方面的轨迹有所不同,1995-2013年日本的经济萎缩与2010年以来中国的快速增长形成了鲜明对比。我认为,这种分歧可以归因于美国金融规范与其社会规范之间不同程度的兼容性,它们融入全球经济的时间不同(“嵌入式自由主义”或新自由主义的影响),以及每个国家关键行为者的利益。反自由主义的日本精英扭转了消费的金融化,以维护反资本主义的“勤奋规范”和对中介组织的强烈依恋,而中介组织是他们统治地位的基石。相比之下,自帝制后期以来,中国社会中根深蒂固的经济理性主义为中国的消费金融化提供了便利。当时,在专制统治下,通过大幅取消固定的中介组织,资本和劳动力的流动性得到了增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Politics
Contemporary Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信