Association of developmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis and stunting

Q4 Medicine
Jamlick Muthuuri
{"title":"Association of developmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis and stunting","authors":"Jamlick Muthuuri","doi":"10.4103/isj.isj_20_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine a possible relationship between developmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis (DLSS) and stunting. Background: Stunting is due to failure of longitudinal length with shortened long bones. Stunted individuals have failure of growth of long bones implying a possibility of involvement of short and flat bones. The hypothesis in this study is that DLSS is part of a generalized skeletal dysplasia. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study (CSA) of 400 patients looking at the association of DLSS with stunting. The study compares the size of the spinal canal in individuals with stunting and those without stunting. Stunting was defined according to the WHO/UNICEF criteria of −2SD of the median height of the same population. The participants were divided into two types: those who were deemed stunted and those who were not. DLSS was similarly defined as −2SD of the relevant measured parameter. The study included skeletally mature patients between 18 and 60 years. All syndromic individuals, those with spine tumors and previous spine surgery, were excluded. Results: Four hundred individuals were sampled from a pool of 597 participants. One hundred and eight or 27% were stunted. The stunted individuals had statistically significantly shallow canal depths or anteroposterior diameters (11.2 ± 2.0 mm vs. 14.6 ± 2.6 mm, t(398) = −11.1, P < 0.001), and narrower canal widths (transverse diameters) (14.6 ± 3.3 mm vs. 18.8 ± 4.5 mm, t(398) = −8.1, P < 0.001) and smaller CSAs (134.0 ± 49.4 mm vs. 220.2 ± 82.0, t(398) = −9.4, P < 0.001) when compared to individuals with normal heights. Odds ratio was 10. Conclusions: Stunted individuals have smaller lumbar spinal canals when compared to nonstunted individuals. It can be concluded that developmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis is part of a generalized skeletal dysplasia.","PeriodicalId":34652,"journal":{"name":"Indian Spine Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"149 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/isj.isj_20_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine a possible relationship between developmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis (DLSS) and stunting. Background: Stunting is due to failure of longitudinal length with shortened long bones. Stunted individuals have failure of growth of long bones implying a possibility of involvement of short and flat bones. The hypothesis in this study is that DLSS is part of a generalized skeletal dysplasia. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study (CSA) of 400 patients looking at the association of DLSS with stunting. The study compares the size of the spinal canal in individuals with stunting and those without stunting. Stunting was defined according to the WHO/UNICEF criteria of −2SD of the median height of the same population. The participants were divided into two types: those who were deemed stunted and those who were not. DLSS was similarly defined as −2SD of the relevant measured parameter. The study included skeletally mature patients between 18 and 60 years. All syndromic individuals, those with spine tumors and previous spine surgery, were excluded. Results: Four hundred individuals were sampled from a pool of 597 participants. One hundred and eight or 27% were stunted. The stunted individuals had statistically significantly shallow canal depths or anteroposterior diameters (11.2 ± 2.0 mm vs. 14.6 ± 2.6 mm, t(398) = −11.1, P < 0.001), and narrower canal widths (transverse diameters) (14.6 ± 3.3 mm vs. 18.8 ± 4.5 mm, t(398) = −8.1, P < 0.001) and smaller CSAs (134.0 ± 49.4 mm vs. 220.2 ± 82.0, t(398) = −9.4, P < 0.001) when compared to individuals with normal heights. Odds ratio was 10. Conclusions: Stunted individuals have smaller lumbar spinal canals when compared to nonstunted individuals. It can be concluded that developmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis is part of a generalized skeletal dysplasia.
发展性腰椎管狭窄与发育迟缓的关系
目的:探讨发育性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)与发育不良之间的可能关系。背景:发育迟缓是由于纵向长度的失败,长骨缩短。发育不良的人长骨发育不全,这意味着短骨和平骨也可能受到影响。本研究的假设是DLSS是广泛性骨骼发育不良的一部分。材料和方法:这是一项400例患者的横断面研究(CSA),研究DLSS与发育迟缓的关系。该研究比较了发育迟缓和非发育迟缓个体的椎管大小。发育迟缓的定义参照世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会的标准,即相同人群中位身高的- 2SD。参与者被分为两类:一类被认为发育迟缓,另一类没有发育迟缓。DLSS同样定义为相关测量参数的- 2SD。该研究包括18至60岁的骨骼成熟患者。排除所有有脊柱肿瘤和既往脊柱手术的综合征个体。结果:从597名参与者中抽取了400人。108人发育不良,占27%。与正常身高个体相比,发育不良个体的根管深度或前后径较浅(11.2±2.0 mm vs. 14.6±2.6 mm, t(398) = - 11.1, P < 0.001),根管宽度(横径)较窄(14.6±3.3 mm vs. 18.8±4.5 mm, t(398) = - 8.1, P < 0.001), csma较小(134.0±49.4 mm vs. 220.2±82.0,t(398) = - 9.4, P < 0.001)。优势比为10。结论:与非发育不良个体相比,发育不良个体的腰椎管更小。结论:发育性腰椎管狭窄是全身性骨骼发育不良的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Spine Journal
Indian Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信