Methodological approaches and some results of the assessment of objects of accumulated environmental damage according to public health risk criteria

Q4 Medicine
N. Zaitseva, I. May, S. Kleyn, Andrey A. Guskov, Natalya I. Kolesnikova, Еkaterina V. Maksimovа
{"title":"Methodological approaches and some results of the assessment of objects of accumulated environmental damage according to public health risk criteria","authors":"N. Zaitseva, I. May, S. Kleyn, Andrey A. Guskov, Natalya I. Kolesnikova, Еkaterina V. Maksimovа","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-523-531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The relevance of study arises from the great number of objects of accumulated environmental damage (OAED) in the Russian Federation and the necessity to identify those that are subject to immediate elimination. \nThe aim of this study was to test methodical approaches to estimating actual OAED, assign them into categories, and rank them as per health risk indicators; also, we generalized the results obtained by estimating 192 objects in 2022. \nMaterials and methods. Fuzzy set theory was used as a methodical base for analyzing the results. Method makes it possible to analyze a great number of both quantitative and qualitative heterogeneous variables, as one complex. Matrices with each indicator estimated in terms of influence on human health were filled in for each type of objects. \nResults. Health risk assessment did not identify any objects that could be assigned into an ‘extremely high risk’ category. 17 OAED (8.9 %) were ranked as ‘high risk’ objects (R=0.76÷0.60). 101 OAED (52.6 %) – as ‘average risk’ objects (R=0.39÷0.58). 72 objects (37.5 %) created ‘moderate risks’ (R=0.45÷0.21). Two objects were considered ‘low risk’ ones (R=0.33÷0.20). \nLimitations. Quantitative data describe only 192 examined objects located in specific geological and climatic-geographical conditions. \nConclusion. The study results give evidence that applied methods are relevant, flexible, and provide correct comparative estimations of OAED of various origin, types of accumulated wastes, existence, and locations. The regulatory and legal base for estimation of ОАЕD further development considering health risk indicators for determining priority of its elimination. Targeted studies with elements of human biomonitoring would become an additional factor providing more solid evidence of OAED negative effect on health, which allows determining the relevance of the elimination of the object assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of measures to eliminate objects.","PeriodicalId":12550,"journal":{"name":"Gigiena i sanitariia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gigiena i sanitariia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-523-531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of study arises from the great number of objects of accumulated environmental damage (OAED) in the Russian Federation and the necessity to identify those that are subject to immediate elimination. The aim of this study was to test methodical approaches to estimating actual OAED, assign them into categories, and rank them as per health risk indicators; also, we generalized the results obtained by estimating 192 objects in 2022. Materials and methods. Fuzzy set theory was used as a methodical base for analyzing the results. Method makes it possible to analyze a great number of both quantitative and qualitative heterogeneous variables, as one complex. Matrices with each indicator estimated in terms of influence on human health were filled in for each type of objects. Results. Health risk assessment did not identify any objects that could be assigned into an ‘extremely high risk’ category. 17 OAED (8.9 %) were ranked as ‘high risk’ objects (R=0.76÷0.60). 101 OAED (52.6 %) – as ‘average risk’ objects (R=0.39÷0.58). 72 objects (37.5 %) created ‘moderate risks’ (R=0.45÷0.21). Two objects were considered ‘low risk’ ones (R=0.33÷0.20). Limitations. Quantitative data describe only 192 examined objects located in specific geological and climatic-geographical conditions. Conclusion. The study results give evidence that applied methods are relevant, flexible, and provide correct comparative estimations of OAED of various origin, types of accumulated wastes, existence, and locations. The regulatory and legal base for estimation of ОАЕD further development considering health risk indicators for determining priority of its elimination. Targeted studies with elements of human biomonitoring would become an additional factor providing more solid evidence of OAED negative effect on health, which allows determining the relevance of the elimination of the object assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of measures to eliminate objects.
基于公共健康风险标准的累积环境损害对象评价方法及部分结果
介绍。这项研究之所以有意义,是因为俄罗斯联邦有大量的累积环境破坏对象,而且有必要确定那些需要立即消除的对象。本研究的目的是测试估算实际OAED的方法,将其分类,并根据健康风险指标对其进行排名;并对2022年192个天体的估算结果进行了概化。材料和方法。采用模糊集合理论作为分析结果的方法基础。该方法可以将大量的定量和定性异质变量作为一个复合体来分析。根据对人类健康影响的估计,为每一类物体填写了每个指标的矩阵。结果。健康风险评估没有确定任何可被划入“极高风险”类别的物体。17个OAED(8.9%)被列为“高风险”对象(R=0.76÷0.60)。101个OAED(52.6%) -作为“平均风险”对象(R=0.39÷0.58)。72个对象(37.5%)具有“中等风险”(R=0.45÷0.21)。两个对象被认为是“低风险”对象(R=0.33÷0.20)。的局限性。定量数据仅描述了位于特定地质和气候地理条件下的192个被检查对象。结论。研究结果表明,所采用的方法是相关的、灵活的,并为各种来源、累积废物类型、存在和位置的OAED提供了正确的比较估计。评估ОАЕD进一步发展的监管和法律基础,考虑到健康风险指标,以确定其消除的优先事项。具有人体生物监测要素的有针对性的研究将成为提供OAED对健康的负面影响的更确凿证据的另一个因素,从而可以确定消除对象的相关性,评估消除对象措施的有效性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gigiena i sanitariia
Gigiena i sanitariia Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信