Open Government Data: The OECD's Swiss army knife in the transformation of government

IF 4.1 1区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Policy and Internet Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.1002/poi3.275

Clarissa Valli Buttow, S. Weerts

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Open Government Data (OGD) has been framed as a collection of tools enabling the achievement of diverse goals: to increase transparency and thus improve democracy, to boost economic development, and to enhance the ef ﬁ ciency of public services. To investigate the evolution of OGD, this study focuses on the work of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). To identify the underlying values and multiple purposes of OGD, we propose a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) study, which aims to show how OGD has been forged and how the expectations towards it have evolved. This paper aims to contribute to the existing literature, offering a critical perspective of the OECD's work on OGD, as well as developing a more nuanced understanding of OGD's conceptual features. Finally, the study reveals the emergence of a data ‐ driven government model, paving the way for further research on its effects on Public Administration and Public Law.

查看原文本刊更多论文

开放政府数据:经合组织在政府转型中的瑞士军刀

开放政府数据（OGD）被定义为实现各种目标的工具集合：提高透明度，从而改善民主，促进经济发展，提高公共服务效率。为了研究OGD的演变，本研究重点关注经济合作与发展组织（OECD）的工作。为了确定OGD的潜在价值观和多重目的，我们提出了一项批判性话语分析（CDA）研究，旨在展示OGD是如何形成的，以及对它的期望是如何演变的。本文旨在为现有文献做出贡献，为经合组织在OGD方面的工作提供一个批判性的视角，并对OGD的概念特征进行更细致的理解。最后，该研究揭示了数据驱动的政府模式的出现，为进一步研究其对公共行政和公法的影响铺平了道路。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Policy and Internet Multiple-

CiteScore

8.40

自引率

10.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Understanding public policy in the age of the Internet requires understanding how individuals, organizations, governments and networks behave, and what motivates them in this new environment. Technological innovation and internet-mediated interaction raise both challenges and opportunities for public policy: whether in areas that have received much work already (e.g. digital divides, digital government, and privacy) or newer areas, like regulation of data-intensive technologies and platforms, the rise of precarious labour, and regulatory responses to misinformation and hate speech. We welcome innovative research in areas where the Internet already impacts public policy, where it raises new challenges or dilemmas, or provides opportunities for policy that is smart and equitable. While we welcome perspectives from any academic discipline, we look particularly for insight that can feed into social science disciplines like political science, public administration, economics, sociology, and communication. We welcome articles that introduce methodological innovation, theoretical development, or rigorous data analysis concerning a particular question or problem of public policy.