Trends in delivery mode occurring during the Covid-19 pandemic and risks in long-term urogynecology cases: A narrative review

E. Kurniawati, Gatut Hardianto, Hari Paraton, Azami Denas Azinar, T. H. S. Hadi, N. A. Rahmawati
{"title":"Trends in delivery mode occurring during the Covid-19 pandemic and risks in long-term urogynecology cases: A narrative review","authors":"E. Kurniawati, Gatut Hardianto, Hari Paraton, Azami Denas Azinar, T. H. S. Hadi, N. A. Rahmawati","doi":"10.20473/mog.v29i32021.136-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HIGHLIGHT 1. Trend of delivery types during Covid-19 pandemic and the risk of urogynecology cases, particularly sexual dysfunction, pelvic floor dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence, was reviewed.2. Cesarean section was found higher than normal deliveries due to the consideration of possiblee exposure to the virus.3. Sexual dysfunction was found not to have relations to mode of delivery, but those with mode of delivery other than normal likely had dyspareunia at 18 months postpartum.4. The choice of method of delivery needs to be determined wisely by considering medical indications and the risk factors. ABSTRACTWomen's quality of life in the long term is also influenced by their reproductive health. Various diseases appear related to urogynecology cases such as sexual dysfunction, pelvic floor dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence. The study reviews the trend of types of delivery during the pandemic and the risk of urogynecology cases, especially in the three cases. The narrative review study was conducted using the PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. The results showed that the percentage of cesarean section was higher than normal deliveries because of the view on the safety of exposure to the virus. Several studies have found that sexual dysfunction was not related to mode of delivery but women who delivered by emergency caesarean section, vacuum extraction, or caesarean section were more likely to report dyspareunia at 18 months postpartum but adjusted for maternal age and other confounders. Meanwhile, compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery with a protective effect or reduction of stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse. There is a tendency to choose a certain pattern of delivery so that the choice of method needs to be chosen wisely and through medical indications and consider risk factors for long-term reproductive health problems.","PeriodicalId":52893,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mog.v29i32021.136-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HIGHLIGHT 1. Trend of delivery types during Covid-19 pandemic and the risk of urogynecology cases, particularly sexual dysfunction, pelvic floor dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence, was reviewed.2. Cesarean section was found higher than normal deliveries due to the consideration of possiblee exposure to the virus.3. Sexual dysfunction was found not to have relations to mode of delivery, but those with mode of delivery other than normal likely had dyspareunia at 18 months postpartum.4. The choice of method of delivery needs to be determined wisely by considering medical indications and the risk factors. ABSTRACTWomen's quality of life in the long term is also influenced by their reproductive health. Various diseases appear related to urogynecology cases such as sexual dysfunction, pelvic floor dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence. The study reviews the trend of types of delivery during the pandemic and the risk of urogynecology cases, especially in the three cases. The narrative review study was conducted using the PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. The results showed that the percentage of cesarean section was higher than normal deliveries because of the view on the safety of exposure to the virus. Several studies have found that sexual dysfunction was not related to mode of delivery but women who delivered by emergency caesarean section, vacuum extraction, or caesarean section were more likely to report dyspareunia at 18 months postpartum but adjusted for maternal age and other confounders. Meanwhile, compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery with a protective effect or reduction of stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse. There is a tendency to choose a certain pattern of delivery so that the choice of method needs to be chosen wisely and through medical indications and consider risk factors for long-term reproductive health problems.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间分娩方式的趋势及其长期泌尿妇科病例的风险:叙述性综述
重点1.回顾了新冠肺炎大流行期间分娩类型的趋势和泌尿系病例的风险,特别是性功能障碍、盆底功能障碍和压力性尿失禁。由于考虑到可能接触病毒,剖腹产被发现高于正常分娩。性功能障碍被发现与分娩方式无关,但那些分娩方式正常的人可能在产后18个月时出现性交困难。分娩方式的选择需要通过考虑医学适应症和风险因素来明智地确定。摘要妇女的长期生活质量也受到生殖健康的影响。出现了各种与泌尿生殖系统相关的疾病,如性功能障碍、盆底功能障碍和压力性尿失禁。这项研究回顾了疫情期间分娩类型的趋势以及泌尿生殖系统病例的风险,尤其是在这三个病例中。叙述性综述研究使用PubMed、Science Direct和Google Scholar数据库进行。结果显示,剖宫产的比例高于正常分娩,因为人们认为接触病毒是安全的。几项研究发现,性功能障碍与分娩方式无关,但通过紧急剖腹产、真空抽吸或剖腹产分娩的女性更有可能在产后18个月时报告性交困难,但要根据产妇年龄和其他混杂因素进行调整。同时,与自然阴道分娩相比,剖宫产具有保护作用或减少压力性尿失禁、膀胱过度活动和盆腔器官脱垂。人们倾向于选择某种分娩方式,因此需要通过医学适应症明智地选择分娩方式,并考虑长期生殖健康问题的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信