Cardiovascular Reaction to Orthostatic Test Among Non-functional Overreaching Athletes with Vegetative Disorders (The Physical Therapist Perspective)

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
V. Shevets, L. Sherstiuk, V. Bumeister, V. Lychko, Oleksii V Korenkov, T. Ivakhnyuk, Dmytro Sotnikov, Iryna Brizhata
{"title":"Cardiovascular Reaction to Orthostatic Test Among Non-functional Overreaching Athletes with Vegetative Disorders (The Physical Therapist Perspective)","authors":"V. Shevets, L. Sherstiuk, V. Bumeister, V. Lychko, Oleksii V Korenkov, T. Ivakhnyuk, Dmytro Sotnikov, Iryna Brizhata","doi":"10.36740/abal202301107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The non-functional overreaching requires a deeper study because its diagnosing is not based on conventional methods. Orthostatic and clinostatic tests make it easy and quick to detect health problems. The purpose of this research is defining orthostatic reactions among 68 athletes with and without signs of non-functional overreaching.\nMaterials and Methods: Our research comprises 2 groups of 68 athletes subdivided by presence of non-functional overreaching. The first group includes 27 persons with vegetative disorder signs. The second group covers 41 individuals without non-functional overreaching. For all of them, we conducted orthostatic tests to record blood pressure and heart rate horizontally and vertically.\nResults: The research showed that 9 athletes (33.3% of the O+ group) had unsatisfactory results after body tests in horizontal and vertical positions. All athletes revealed the orthostatic tolerance disorder. For 5 sportsmen, the latter was accompanied by the clinostatic overreaction. Resting heart rate did not vary considerably between both groups (р=0.412). However, orthostatic tests reflected the sharp index rise among 9 individuals. For non-functional overreaching athletes, the mean value (р<0.001) exceeded the corresponding one in the O- group more than twofold.\nConclusions: Although today it is possible to differentiate orthostatic-clinostatic tolerance from vegetative dysfunction, further research must be conducted to clarify this syndrome types and to improve physical recovery for non-functional overreaching athletes.","PeriodicalId":42213,"journal":{"name":"Acta Balneologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Balneologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/abal202301107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The non-functional overreaching requires a deeper study because its diagnosing is not based on conventional methods. Orthostatic and clinostatic tests make it easy and quick to detect health problems. The purpose of this research is defining orthostatic reactions among 68 athletes with and without signs of non-functional overreaching. Materials and Methods: Our research comprises 2 groups of 68 athletes subdivided by presence of non-functional overreaching. The first group includes 27 persons with vegetative disorder signs. The second group covers 41 individuals without non-functional overreaching. For all of them, we conducted orthostatic tests to record blood pressure and heart rate horizontally and vertically. Results: The research showed that 9 athletes (33.3% of the O+ group) had unsatisfactory results after body tests in horizontal and vertical positions. All athletes revealed the orthostatic tolerance disorder. For 5 sportsmen, the latter was accompanied by the clinostatic overreaction. Resting heart rate did not vary considerably between both groups (р=0.412). However, orthostatic tests reflected the sharp index rise among 9 individuals. For non-functional overreaching athletes, the mean value (р<0.001) exceeded the corresponding one in the O- group more than twofold. Conclusions: Although today it is possible to differentiate orthostatic-clinostatic tolerance from vegetative dysfunction, further research must be conducted to clarify this syndrome types and to improve physical recovery for non-functional overreaching athletes.
非功能性过伸运动员伴植物性疾病对直立试验的心血管反应(物理治疗师视角)
目的:非功能性过伸症的诊断方法尚不完善,需要深入研究。直立和倾斜测试使检测健康问题变得简单和快速。本研究的目的是确定68名有或没有非功能性伸展迹象的运动员的直立反应。材料和方法:我们的研究包括两组68名运动员,按非功能性过伸进行细分。第一组包括27名有植物性紊乱症状的人。第二组包括41个人,没有非功能性的过度伸展。我们对所有人都进行了直立测试,以记录水平和垂直方向的血压和心率。结果:研究发现,9名运动员(占0 +组的33.3%)在水平和垂直体位的身体测试结果不理想。所有运动员均表现出直立耐受性障碍。5名运动员,后者伴有静止过度反应。两组间静息心率无显著差异(χ =0.412)。然而,直立测试显示9个人的指数急剧上升。对于非功能性过伸运动员,平均值(<0.001)超过O组相应值的两倍以上。结论:虽然目前可以区分直立-倾斜耐受和植物功能障碍,但必须进行进一步的研究来澄清这种综合征类型,并改善非功能性过度伸展运动员的身体恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Balneologica
Acta Balneologica REHABILITATION-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信