Fibrin sealant for split-thickness skin graft fixation in burn wounds - An ancillary postulated role in scar modulation

Q1 Medicine
Vamseedharan Muthukumar , Suvashis Dash , Ahmad Faraz Danish , Srushti Sheth , Deepak Nanda , Charanjeet Ahluwalia
{"title":"Fibrin sealant for split-thickness skin graft fixation in burn wounds - An ancillary postulated role in scar modulation","authors":"Vamseedharan Muthukumar ,&nbsp;Suvashis Dash ,&nbsp;Ahmad Faraz Danish ,&nbsp;Srushti Sheth ,&nbsp;Deepak Nanda ,&nbsp;Charanjeet Ahluwalia","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Burn care was revolutionized by critical care and excision surgeries which drastically improved the survival rates of the patients. Another cornerstone and basic surgery in all these patients is the skin grafting. Traditionally skin grafts are fixed using sutures, staplers and cyanoacrylate glue. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and effects of fibrin sealant and cyanoacrylate glue in graft fixation and scar characteristics after skin grafting in post burn raw areas.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study was conducted as a retrospective comparative cohort study with prospective follow-up conducted at a tertiary burn care centre in India over a period of one year which included patients between 18–50 years who presented with post burn raw areas and underwent skin graft fixation with fibrin sealant or cyanoacrylate glue.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 40 patients were collected and analyzed in the study. Group 1 (Fibrin sealant) and group 2 (Cyanoacrylate glue) included 20 patients each. The percentage of graft take at the end of 15th post-operative day was higher in group 1 in comparison to group 2 (95 % and 90.2 % respectively). Two patients had graft failure (Mean - 26.75 %) in group 1 in comparison to five in group 2 (Mean - 38.16 %). At end of six months, on modified Vancouver scar scale in categories of pigmentation, vascularity, thickness and pliability - the subjective scorings were better in group 1 overall. Histopathological and immuno-histochemical staining showed better scar characteristics in group 1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of fibrin sealant has shown better results when compared to cyanoacrylate glue in the fixation of skin grafts in post burn raw areas. The superior scores in clinical and histopathological scar characteristics in fibrin sealant group may indicate the role of Fibrin sealant in scar modulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100197","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909520300215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Burn care was revolutionized by critical care and excision surgeries which drastically improved the survival rates of the patients. Another cornerstone and basic surgery in all these patients is the skin grafting. Traditionally skin grafts are fixed using sutures, staplers and cyanoacrylate glue. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and effects of fibrin sealant and cyanoacrylate glue in graft fixation and scar characteristics after skin grafting in post burn raw areas.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted as a retrospective comparative cohort study with prospective follow-up conducted at a tertiary burn care centre in India over a period of one year which included patients between 18–50 years who presented with post burn raw areas and underwent skin graft fixation with fibrin sealant or cyanoacrylate glue.

Results

Data from 40 patients were collected and analyzed in the study. Group 1 (Fibrin sealant) and group 2 (Cyanoacrylate glue) included 20 patients each. The percentage of graft take at the end of 15th post-operative day was higher in group 1 in comparison to group 2 (95 % and 90.2 % respectively). Two patients had graft failure (Mean - 26.75 %) in group 1 in comparison to five in group 2 (Mean - 38.16 %). At end of six months, on modified Vancouver scar scale in categories of pigmentation, vascularity, thickness and pliability - the subjective scorings were better in group 1 overall. Histopathological and immuno-histochemical staining showed better scar characteristics in group 1.

Conclusion

The use of fibrin sealant has shown better results when compared to cyanoacrylate glue in the fixation of skin grafts in post burn raw areas. The superior scores in clinical and histopathological scar characteristics in fibrin sealant group may indicate the role of Fibrin sealant in scar modulation.

用于烧伤创面裂厚皮肤移植固定的纤维蛋白密封剂-在疤痕调节中的辅助假设作用
烧伤护理是革命性的重症监护和切除手术,大大提高了患者的存活率。所有这些病人的另一个基石和基本手术是皮肤移植。传统的植皮是用缝合线、订书机和氰基丙烯酸酯胶来固定的。本研究比较纤维蛋白密封胶和氰基丙烯酸酯胶在烧伤后创面植皮后植皮固定和疤痕特征方面的疗效和效果。材料和方法本研究是一项回顾性比较队列研究,在印度三级烧伤护理中心进行了为期一年的前瞻性随访,其中包括18-50岁的患者,他们出现烧伤后的原始区域,并使用纤维蛋白密封剂或氰基丙烯酸酯胶进行皮肤移植固定。结果本研究收集并分析了40例患者的数据。1组(纤维蛋白密封胶)和2组(氰基丙烯酸酯胶)各20例。1组术后第15天植皮率高于2组(分别为95%和90.2%)。1组有2例移植失败(平均- 26.75%),2组有5例(平均- 38.16%)。6个月后,在改良的温哥华疤痕量表上,在色素沉着、血管密度、厚度和柔韧性方面,第一组的主观评分总体上更好。组织病理学和免疫组化染色显示1组瘢痕特征较好。结论纤维蛋白密封胶与氰基丙烯酸酯胶相比,在烧伤后创面植皮固定中具有更好的效果。纤维蛋白密封胶组在临床和瘢痕组织病理学特征方面得分较高,可能提示纤维蛋白密封胶在瘢痕调节中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信