Physical Activity Behaviours in the Workplace and Home in a University College Population

Q1 Medicine
N. Riddell, R. Baskerville, L. Castell
{"title":"Physical Activity Behaviours in the Workplace and Home in a University College Population","authors":"N. Riddell, R. Baskerville, L. Castell","doi":"10.5334/PAAH.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regular physical activity (PA) and low sedentariness have significant long-term health benefits. Achieving and measuring adequate levels of PA are difficult in office environments. This study’s primary aim was to evaluate PA levels and sedentariness within work and home settings. The accuracy of self-reported physical activity and accelerometer use acceptability were also determined. Methods: 121 university staff, students and fellows (faculty) gave informed consent. Pre-study questionnaires on PA, sedentary time, mood and sleep were completed. Using a FitBit One accelerometer PA was monitored for 7 days. Steps were counted. PA intensity was categorized as light or moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA). Group differences were compared with Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation tests. Results: Average pre-study activity estimation was 1.18 hrs/day (SD: 0.622) (95%CI ± 0.049). Subsequently, each participant averaged 1.49 hrs/day (SD: 0.98) walking; (70.9 mins/day (SD: 45.0) moderate activity (3–5 Metabolic Equivalents (METs); 20.5mins/day (SD: 17.2) vigorous activity (>5METs). Average daily sedentary time was 654.6 min (±152.3), with average time at work standing or in very light activity as 6.47 hrs (SD: 4.3 hrs) ( Conclusion: All participants achieved near recommended PA levels. Work and home environments contributed reciprocally to daily totals. Significant differences between self-reported and measured PA levels indicates that both should be recorded.","PeriodicalId":32633,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/PAAH.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Regular physical activity (PA) and low sedentariness have significant long-term health benefits. Achieving and measuring adequate levels of PA are difficult in office environments. This study’s primary aim was to evaluate PA levels and sedentariness within work and home settings. The accuracy of self-reported physical activity and accelerometer use acceptability were also determined. Methods: 121 university staff, students and fellows (faculty) gave informed consent. Pre-study questionnaires on PA, sedentary time, mood and sleep were completed. Using a FitBit One accelerometer PA was monitored for 7 days. Steps were counted. PA intensity was categorized as light or moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA). Group differences were compared with Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation tests. Results: Average pre-study activity estimation was 1.18 hrs/day (SD: 0.622) (95%CI ± 0.049). Subsequently, each participant averaged 1.49 hrs/day (SD: 0.98) walking; (70.9 mins/day (SD: 45.0) moderate activity (3–5 Metabolic Equivalents (METs); 20.5mins/day (SD: 17.2) vigorous activity (>5METs). Average daily sedentary time was 654.6 min (±152.3), with average time at work standing or in very light activity as 6.47 hrs (SD: 4.3 hrs) ( Conclusion: All participants achieved near recommended PA levels. Work and home environments contributed reciprocally to daily totals. Significant differences between self-reported and measured PA levels indicates that both should be recorded.
大学学院人群工作场所和家庭的身体活动行为
背景:有规律的体育活动(PA)和低久坐性对健康有显著的长期益处。在办公室环境中,实现和测量适当的PA水平是困难的。本研究的主要目的是评估PA水平和工作和家庭环境中的久坐性。还确定了自我报告的身体活动的准确性和加速度计使用的可接受性。方法:对121名高校教职工、学生、研究员(教职工)进行知情同意。完成了关于PA、久坐时间、情绪和睡眠的研究前问卷。使用FitBit One加速度计对PA进行7天的监测。计算了步数。PA强度分为轻度或中度至剧烈(MVPA)。将组间差异与Spearman和Pearson的相关检验进行比较。结果:研究前平均活动量估计为1.18小时/天(SD:0.622)(95%CI±0.049)。随后,每位参与者平均步行1.49小时/天,SD:0.98;(70.9分钟/天(SD:45.0)中等活性(3-5个代谢当量(MET));20.5mins/天(SD:17.2)剧烈活动(>5METs)。平均每日久坐时间为654.6分钟(±152.3),站立或轻度活动的平均工作时间为6.47小时(SD:4.3小时)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Activity and Health
Physical Activity and Health Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信