The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
J. Román
{"title":"The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era","authors":"J. Román","doi":"10.1590/0034-7329201800208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alternative international cooperative order, not necessarily the one wished by American elites. Latin America’s appropriation and reinterpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s message stirred controversies and disputes in the United States, within the liberal internationalist sectors, both in political positions and private actors. This article explores the reaction of certain U.S. liberal elites to the way Latin Americans appropriated and shaped international Rooseveltian ideas. It argues that some American internationalist elites feared that the way in which Latin Americans understood the New Deal and the Good Neighbor Policy might push development ideas abroad beyond the pale, as it might encourage the more radical stance of FDR administration at home, and it might jeopardize an American-led reorganization of the international order.","PeriodicalId":45317,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/0034-7329201800208","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201800208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alternative international cooperative order, not necessarily the one wished by American elites. Latin America’s appropriation and reinterpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s message stirred controversies and disputes in the United States, within the liberal internationalist sectors, both in political positions and private actors. This article explores the reaction of certain U.S. liberal elites to the way Latin Americans appropriated and shaped international Rooseveltian ideas. It argues that some American internationalist elites feared that the way in which Latin Americans understood the New Deal and the Good Neighbor Policy might push development ideas abroad beyond the pale, as it might encourage the more radical stance of FDR administration at home, and it might jeopardize an American-led reorganization of the international order.
来自边缘的挑战:罗斯福时代拉丁美洲的新政和自由国际主义的形成
罗斯福的政策,特别是新政,成为了一种全球品牌,并创造了一个跨国讨论空间。许多外围国家,特别是拉丁美洲国家,采用了这一概念,并将自己的提案称为自己的新政。这些提议产生了一种替代性的国际合作秩序,而不一定是美国精英所希望的。拉丁美洲对富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福信息的挪用和重新解释在美国自由国际主义部门引发了政治立场和私人行为者的争议和争端。本文探讨了某些美国自由主义精英对拉丁美洲人挪用和塑造国际罗斯福思想的方式的反应。它认为,一些美国国际主义精英担心,拉丁美洲人理解新政和睦邻政策的方式可能会将发展理念推向国外,因为这可能会鼓励罗斯福政府在国内采取更激进的立场,并可能危及美国领导的国际秩序重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信