Analysis of functional outcome of single and double level lumbar discectomy

Surendra Gupta, D. Singh, A. Chhabra, M. Kaif, Kuldeep Yadav, R. Singh
{"title":"Analysis of functional outcome of single and double level lumbar discectomy","authors":"Surendra Gupta, D. Singh, A. Chhabra, M. Kaif, Kuldeep Yadav, R. Singh","doi":"10.33962/roneuro-2021-048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:  Functional improvement in lumbar PIVD patients can be assessed either objectively like improvement in SLRT, relief in pain, etc or subjectively using different types of scales. In our study, we have used Revised Oswestry Disability Index (RODI) score, Ronald–Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), The Back Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) to analyse functional outcome in single and double level lumbar PIVD patients pre-operatively and post-operatively.\nMethod:  It is a prospective study including 80 patients of lumbar PIVD who failed to respond to conservative treatment.  Patients were clinically evaluated and disability scales viz- RODI, RDQ & BQ were recorded. After lumber discectomy, patients were again assessed and scored as per disability scales at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.\nResult:  RODI, RDQ and BQ scores were calculated at pre-operatively and post-operatively 1, 6 and 12 months and statistically analysed. The mean RODI scores at pre-operative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months were 72, 18, 10, and 6 respectively. The mean RDQ scores at pre-operative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months were 15, 5, 3, and 2 respectively.  Similarly, the mean BQ scores at pre-operative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months were 51, 12, 8, and 4 respectively.  Statistically, significant improvement was seen in mean scores of all 3 functional scales and maximum changes were observed after 1 month. Statistically, significant improvements were observed in 54 out of 62 patients (87%). Three questions of BQ related to the patient social and family activities, anxiety and depression were separately compared pre and post-operatively and they showed a statistically significant improvement.\nConclusion: Overall 87% of patients had a significant improvement in functional assessment using RODI, RDQ and BQ scales. On comparing single and double level discectomy patients, the functional improvement was similar in follow up of one year. Social and family activities (SFA), depression and anxiety of the patients improved significantly over 1 year.","PeriodicalId":30188,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2021-048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:  Functional improvement in lumbar PIVD patients can be assessed either objectively like improvement in SLRT, relief in pain, etc or subjectively using different types of scales. In our study, we have used Revised Oswestry Disability Index (RODI) score, Ronald–Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), The Back Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) to analyse functional outcome in single and double level lumbar PIVD patients pre-operatively and post-operatively. Method:  It is a prospective study including 80 patients of lumbar PIVD who failed to respond to conservative treatment.  Patients were clinically evaluated and disability scales viz- RODI, RDQ & BQ were recorded. After lumber discectomy, patients were again assessed and scored as per disability scales at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Result:  RODI, RDQ and BQ scores were calculated at pre-operatively and post-operatively 1, 6 and 12 months and statistically analysed. The mean RODI scores at pre-operative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months were 72, 18, 10, and 6 respectively. The mean RDQ scores at pre-operative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months were 15, 5, 3, and 2 respectively.  Similarly, the mean BQ scores at pre-operative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months were 51, 12, 8, and 4 respectively.  Statistically, significant improvement was seen in mean scores of all 3 functional scales and maximum changes were observed after 1 month. Statistically, significant improvements were observed in 54 out of 62 patients (87%). Three questions of BQ related to the patient social and family activities, anxiety and depression were separately compared pre and post-operatively and they showed a statistically significant improvement. Conclusion: Overall 87% of patients had a significant improvement in functional assessment using RODI, RDQ and BQ scales. On comparing single and double level discectomy patients, the functional improvement was similar in follow up of one year. Social and family activities (SFA), depression and anxiety of the patients improved significantly over 1 year.
单、双层腰椎间盘切除术的疗效分析
引言:腰椎PIVD患者的功能改善可以通过客观评估,如SLRT的改善、疼痛缓解等,也可以使用不同类型的量表进行主观评估。在我们的研究中,我们使用修订的Oswestry残疾指数(RODI)评分、Ronald–Morris残疾问卷(RDQ)和Back Bournemouth问卷(BQ)来分析单级和双级腰椎PIVD患者术前和术后的功能结果。对患者进行临床评估,并记录残疾量表,即RODI、RDQ和BQ。腰椎间盘切除术后,在术后1个月、6个月和1年再次根据残疾量表对患者进行评估和评分。结果:计算术前、术后1、6和12个月的RODI、RDQ和BQ评分,并进行统计学分析。术前和术后1、6和12个月的平均RODI评分分别为72、18、10和6。术前和术后1、6和12个月的平均RDQ评分分别为15、5、3和2。同样,术前和术后1、6和12个月的平均BQ评分分别为51、12、8和4。从统计数据来看,所有3个功能量表的平均得分都有显著改善,1个月后观察到最大变化。从统计数据来看,62名患者中有54名(87%)有显著改善。术前和术后分别比较了与患者社交和家庭活动、焦虑和抑郁有关的三个BQ问题,它们显示出统计学上的显著改善。结论:总体而言,87%的患者在使用RODI、RDQ和BQ量表进行功能评估方面有显著改善。在比较单级和双级椎间盘切除术患者时,在一年的随访中,功能改善是相似的。患者的社交和家庭活动(SFA)、抑郁和焦虑在一年内显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信