On the Verge of Verse: Charles Reznikoff’s Lineations in Holocaust

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
STYLE Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.5325/style.56.4.0351
Roi Tartakovsky
{"title":"On the Verge of Verse: Charles Reznikoff’s Lineations in Holocaust","authors":"Roi Tartakovsky","doi":"10.5325/style.56.4.0351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Jewish-American poet Charles Reznikoff’s 1975 book Holocaust takes as its basis the transcripts of the Nuremberg trials and the Eichmann trial. Among the various subtle interventions on the way from source material to “documentary verse,” the least theorized but most dramatic is Reznikoff’s decision to lineate the original courtroom prose of the survivors. Reznikoff’s prose in chopped-up lines offers a unique opportunity to engage in the larger question of the poetic force of lineation, while considering the specific advantages and risks that it entails in the case of Holocaust. This article argues that lineation is central to Reznikoff’s book because it allows him twice to straddle the line between conflicting goals: (1) lineation signals that the text is poetic while avoiding overt aestheticization that is often associated with lyrical poetry; (2) lineation implies Reznikoff’s response to the tragic material, while avoiding explicit, over-bearing authorial presence and sentimentality.","PeriodicalId":45300,"journal":{"name":"STYLE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STYLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.56.4.0351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jewish-American poet Charles Reznikoff’s 1975 book Holocaust takes as its basis the transcripts of the Nuremberg trials and the Eichmann trial. Among the various subtle interventions on the way from source material to “documentary verse,” the least theorized but most dramatic is Reznikoff’s decision to lineate the original courtroom prose of the survivors. Reznikoff’s prose in chopped-up lines offers a unique opportunity to engage in the larger question of the poetic force of lineation, while considering the specific advantages and risks that it entails in the case of Holocaust. This article argues that lineation is central to Reznikoff’s book because it allows him twice to straddle the line between conflicting goals: (1) lineation signals that the text is poetic while avoiding overt aestheticization that is often associated with lyrical poetry; (2) lineation implies Reznikoff’s response to the tragic material, while avoiding explicit, over-bearing authorial presence and sentimentality.
论诗歌的边缘:雷兹尼科夫在大屠杀中的台词
美籍犹太裔诗人查尔斯·雷兹尼科夫1975年出版的《大屠杀》一书以纽伦堡审判和艾希曼审判的笔录为基础。在从原始材料到“纪实诗歌”的各种微妙的干预中,最不理论化但最具戏剧性的是雷兹尼科夫决定将幸存者的原始法庭散文划线。雷兹尼科夫的断句散文提供了一个独特的机会,让我们在考虑大屠杀的情况下它所带来的具体优势和风险的同时,研究断行的诗歌力量这一更大的问题。本文认为,行线是雷兹尼科夫的书的核心,因为它允许他两次跨越冲突目标之间的界限:(1)行线表明文本是诗意的,同时避免了通常与抒情诗歌相关的明显的审美化;(2)线条暗示了雷兹尼科夫对悲剧材料的回应,同时避免了明确的、傲慢的作者存在和多愁善感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
STYLE
STYLE Multiple-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Style invites submissions that address questions of style, stylistics, and poetics, including research and theory in discourse analysis, literary and nonliterary genres, narrative, figuration, metrics, rhetorical analysis, and the pedagogy of style. Contributions may draw from such fields as literary criticism, critical theory, computational linguistics, cognitive linguistics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric and writing studies. In addition, Style publishes reviews, review-essays, surveys, interviews, translations, enumerative and annotated bibliographies, and reports on conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信