The Constitutionalization of information security in Russian Law: improving the theoretical model

Y. Gavrilova
{"title":"The Constitutionalization of information security in Russian Law: improving the theoretical model","authors":"Y. Gavrilova","doi":"10.22363/2313-2337-2023-27-1-97-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research discusses one of the constitutional amendments of 2020. In accordance with the new version of paragraph “m” of Part 1 of Article 71 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the exclusive powers of the Russian Federation include issues of ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state when applying information technologies, and digital data turnover. The consolidation of the problem of information security at the constitutional level determines the need for a partial modernization of its theoretical model. Modification and revision of some of its components will lead to higher effectiveness of constitutional regulation and improve the quality of application of industry legislation in the field of information technology and information protection. The purpose of the research is to investigate the main directions of enhancing the theoretical model of information security in terms of constitutional changes. The employed research methods are formal-legal, logical, system, statistical, structural-functional, modeling, and forecasting. The outcome of the study can be outlined as follows. The research clarifies the concept of information security, proposes to generalize the range of basic subjects of public relations related to information security, expand their rights and obligations, highlight the constitutional and sectoral legal regimes of information protection, and strengthen responsibility for offenses in the information sphere. In conclusion the study argues that updating the theoretical model of information security of the Russian Federation should be carried out in the following key areas: firstly, developing information security targets expressed in strategic and program documents of the state; secondly, clarifying classification of information security threats; thirdly, expanding legal regulation density; fourth, strengthening the law-enforcement mechanisms of information security; fifth, establising and maintening optimal balance between legal, technical and ethical regulation of information technologies, primarily digital technologies; and finally, definiing acceptable and unacceptable boundaries of application of information technology and digital data in people's lives.","PeriodicalId":32648,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2023-27-1-97-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research discusses one of the constitutional amendments of 2020. In accordance with the new version of paragraph “m” of Part 1 of Article 71 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the exclusive powers of the Russian Federation include issues of ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state when applying information technologies, and digital data turnover. The consolidation of the problem of information security at the constitutional level determines the need for a partial modernization of its theoretical model. Modification and revision of some of its components will lead to higher effectiveness of constitutional regulation and improve the quality of application of industry legislation in the field of information technology and information protection. The purpose of the research is to investigate the main directions of enhancing the theoretical model of information security in terms of constitutional changes. The employed research methods are formal-legal, logical, system, statistical, structural-functional, modeling, and forecasting. The outcome of the study can be outlined as follows. The research clarifies the concept of information security, proposes to generalize the range of basic subjects of public relations related to information security, expand their rights and obligations, highlight the constitutional and sectoral legal regimes of information protection, and strengthen responsibility for offenses in the information sphere. In conclusion the study argues that updating the theoretical model of information security of the Russian Federation should be carried out in the following key areas: firstly, developing information security targets expressed in strategic and program documents of the state; secondly, clarifying classification of information security threats; thirdly, expanding legal regulation density; fourth, strengthening the law-enforcement mechanisms of information security; fifth, establising and maintening optimal balance between legal, technical and ethical regulation of information technologies, primarily digital technologies; and finally, definiing acceptable and unacceptable boundaries of application of information technology and digital data in people's lives.
俄罗斯法律中的信息安全宪法化:理论模型的完善
研究讨论了2020年的一项宪法修正案。根据新版《俄罗斯联邦宪法》第71条第1部分“m”款,俄罗斯联邦的专属权力包括在应用信息技术时确保个人、社会和国家安全以及数字数据交换等问题。信息安全问题在宪法层面的巩固决定了其理论模型部分现代化的必要性。对其中一些组成部分的修改和修订将提高宪法法规的效力,并提高行业立法在信息技术和信息保护领域的应用质量。本研究的目的是从宪法变化的角度探讨加强信息安全理论模型的主要方向。所采用的研究方法有形式化的法律、逻辑、系统、统计学、结构函数、建模和预测。研究结果概述如下。该研究阐明了信息安全的概念,建议概括与信息安全相关的公共关系的基本主体范围,扩大其权利和义务,强调信息保护的宪法和部门法律制度,并加强对信息领域犯罪的责任。总之,研究认为,更新俄罗斯联邦信息安全理论模型应在以下关键领域进行:首先,制定国家战略和计划文件中表达的信息安全目标;其次,明确了信息安全威胁的分类;三是扩大法律规制密度;四是强化信息安全执法机制;第五,在信息技术(主要是数字技术)的法律、技术和道德监管之间建立并保持最佳平衡;最后,界定信息技术和数字数据在人们生活中应用的可接受和不可接受的界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信