El fundamento humeano de la distinción entre cuestiones de hecho y de valor

Q4 Social Sciences
Albano Jofré
{"title":"El fundamento humeano de la distinción entre cuestiones de hecho y de valor","authors":"Albano Jofré","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.94.2022.pp.109-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In his latest work, Dr. Félix A. Lamas addresses the issue of the gap between the is order and the ought order and states that this is the fundament for the distinction between matters of fact and of right and the naturalistic fallacy formulated by Moore 2 . Mainly, he says that the theoretical bases of these distinctions can be found in the first section of the first part of the book III of the Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume. On the present article we pretend to explore in a critical way those bases by exposing Hume’s theory of practical and theoretical knowledge and confronting it with the tradi-tion of classical Aristotelian-Thomist philosophy","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.94.2022.pp.109-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In his latest work, Dr. Félix A. Lamas addresses the issue of the gap between the is order and the ought order and states that this is the fundament for the distinction between matters of fact and of right and the naturalistic fallacy formulated by Moore 2 . Mainly, he says that the theoretical bases of these distinctions can be found in the first section of the first part of the book III of the Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume. On the present article we pretend to explore in a critical way those bases by exposing Hume’s theory of practical and theoretical knowledge and confronting it with the tradi-tion of classical Aristotelian-Thomist philosophy
事实与价值问题区分的休谟基础
:在他的最新著作中,Félix A.Lamas博士谈到了is秩序和should秩序之间的差距问题,并指出这是区分事实和权利以及Moore 2提出的自然主义谬误的基础。他说,这些区别的理论基础主要可以在大卫·休谟的《人性论》第三卷第一部分的第一节中找到。本文试图通过揭示休谟的实践知识论和理论知识论,并将其与亚里士多德的传统哲学对立起来,对这些理论基础进行批判性的探索
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信