Can Organizational Leaders Sustain Compassionate, Patient-Centered Care and Mitigate Burnout?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
B. Lown, Andrew Shin, Richard N. Jones
{"title":"Can Organizational Leaders Sustain Compassionate, Patient-Centered Care and Mitigate Burnout?","authors":"B. Lown, Andrew Shin, Richard N. Jones","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-18-00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\nOrganizational leaders are recognizing the urgent need to mitigate clinician burnout. They face difficult choices, knowing that burnout threatens the quality and safety of care and the sustainability of their organizations. Creating cultures and system improvements that support the workforce and diminish burnout are vital leadership skills. The motivation to heal draws many health professionals to their chosen work. Further, research suggests that compassion creates a sense of personal reward and professional satisfaction. Although many organizations stress compassion in mission and vision statements, their strategies to enhance well-being largely ignore compassion as a source of joy and connection to purpose.Passage of the HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act in 2009 and the Affordable Care Act in 2010 ushered in a new era in healthcare. Little is known about how changes in the healthcare delivery system related to these legislative milestones have influenced health professionals' capacity to offer compassionate care. Further, advances such as artificial intelligence and virtual care modalities brought more attention to the elements that form the clinician-patient relationship.This study analyzed the views of U.S. healthcare providers on the status of compassionate healthcare compared with 2010. Postulating that compassion is inversely correlated with burnout, we studied this relationship and contributing factors. Our review of evidence-based initiatives suggests that leaders must define the organizational conditions and implement processes that support professionals' innate compassion and contribute to their well-being rather than address burnout later through remedial strategies.","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00023","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Organizational leaders are recognizing the urgent need to mitigate clinician burnout. They face difficult choices, knowing that burnout threatens the quality and safety of care and the sustainability of their organizations. Creating cultures and system improvements that support the workforce and diminish burnout are vital leadership skills. The motivation to heal draws many health professionals to their chosen work. Further, research suggests that compassion creates a sense of personal reward and professional satisfaction. Although many organizations stress compassion in mission and vision statements, their strategies to enhance well-being largely ignore compassion as a source of joy and connection to purpose.Passage of the HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act in 2009 and the Affordable Care Act in 2010 ushered in a new era in healthcare. Little is known about how changes in the healthcare delivery system related to these legislative milestones have influenced health professionals' capacity to offer compassionate care. Further, advances such as artificial intelligence and virtual care modalities brought more attention to the elements that form the clinician-patient relationship.This study analyzed the views of U.S. healthcare providers on the status of compassionate healthcare compared with 2010. Postulating that compassion is inversely correlated with burnout, we studied this relationship and contributing factors. Our review of evidence-based initiatives suggests that leaders must define the organizational conditions and implement processes that support professionals' innate compassion and contribute to their well-being rather than address burnout later through remedial strategies.
组织领导者能否维持富有同情心、以病人为中心的护理并减轻职业倦怠?
高管峰会组织领导人认识到缓解临床医生倦怠的迫切需要。他们面临着艰难的选择,因为他们知道倦怠威胁到护理的质量和安全以及组织的可持续性。创建支持员工并减少倦怠的文化和系统改进是至关重要的领导技能。治愈的动机吸引了许多卫生专业人员选择他们的工作。此外,研究表明,同情心会产生一种个人奖励感和职业满意度。尽管许多组织在使命和愿景声明中强调同情,但他们提高幸福感的策略在很大程度上忽视了同情作为快乐和与目标联系的来源。2009年通过的HITECH(经济和临床健康健康信息技术)法案和2010年通过的平价医疗法案开创了医疗保健的新时代。人们对与这些立法里程碑相关的医疗保健系统的变化如何影响卫生专业人员提供同情护理的能力知之甚少。此外,人工智能和虚拟护理模式等进步使人们更加关注形成临床医生与患者关系的要素。这项研究分析了与2010年相比,美国医疗保健提供者对同情医疗状况的看法。假设同情心与倦怠呈负相关,我们研究了这种关系及其影响因素。我们对循证举措的审查表明,领导者必须定义组织条件并实施流程,以支持专业人士天生的同情心,并为他们的福祉做出贡献,而不是在以后通过补救策略来解决倦怠问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信