TYPE OF ERROR IN COMPLETING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM BASED ON NEWMAN’S ERROR ANALYSIS (NEA) AND POLYA THEORY

Widodo Winarso, Sirojudin Wahid, Rizkiah Rizkiah
{"title":"TYPE OF ERROR IN COMPLETING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM BASED ON NEWMAN’S ERROR ANALYSIS (NEA) AND POLYA THEORY","authors":"Widodo Winarso, Sirojudin Wahid, Rizkiah Rizkiah","doi":"10.26418/jpmipa.v13i1.44765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study disscusses student’s errors in completing mathematical problems based on Newman’s Errror Analysis and Polya Theory. The study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The subject of this study are 78 students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 2 Cirebon. The study uses tests and interviews as data collection techniques. Students take a test to determine their mathematical ability, and the test uses sequence and series as subjects. There are 3 phases in collecting data: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Outline of Error analysis is created using five types of student mathematical error of Newman's Error Analysis and four types of student mathematical error of Polya Theory. The study results based on Newman's Error Analysis are errors reading by 1%, error understanding by 0%, error transforms by 3%, error processing ability by 5%, and error encoding by 7%. As the result of the study based Polya theory, errors when understanding the problem by 31%, errors when devising a plan by 11%, errors when carrying out the plan by 9%, and errors when Looking back by 33%. The result of the interview shows that the error occurs when students don’t do calculations carefully, don’t learn the formula, and cannot distinguish between sequence and series. Students also have a lack of understanding when completing the problem about compound interest.","PeriodicalId":31449,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v13i1.44765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study disscusses student’s errors in completing mathematical problems based on Newman’s Errror Analysis and Polya Theory. The study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The subject of this study are 78 students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 2 Cirebon. The study uses tests and interviews as data collection techniques. Students take a test to determine their mathematical ability, and the test uses sequence and series as subjects. There are 3 phases in collecting data: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Outline of Error analysis is created using five types of student mathematical error of Newman's Error Analysis and four types of student mathematical error of Polya Theory. The study results based on Newman's Error Analysis are errors reading by 1%, error understanding by 0%, error transforms by 3%, error processing ability by 5%, and error encoding by 7%. As the result of the study based Polya theory, errors when understanding the problem by 31%, errors when devising a plan by 11%, errors when carrying out the plan by 9%, and errors when Looking back by 33%. The result of the interview shows that the error occurs when students don’t do calculations carefully, don’t learn the formula, and cannot distinguish between sequence and series. Students also have a lack of understanding when completing the problem about compound interest.
基于纽曼误差分析和多元理论的数学解题误差类型
本研究以纽曼的误差分析和多元理论为基础,探讨学生在数学习题中的错误。本研究采用定性描述方法。本研究的对象是伊斯兰学校(Madrasah Aliyah Negeri) 2 Cirebon的78名学生。该研究使用测试和访谈作为数据收集技术。学生们通过考试来确定他们的数学能力,这种考试以序列和级数为科目。收集数据有三个阶段:数据简化、数据呈现和结论。本文利用Newman误差分析中的五种学生数学误差和Polya理论中的四种学生数学误差创建了误差分析大纲。基于Newman's Error Analysis的研究结果是:错误阅读率1%,错误理解率0%,错误转换率3%,错误处理能力5%,错误编码率7%。基于Polya理论的研究结果表明,理解问题时的错误为31%,制定计划时的错误为11%,执行计划时的错误为9%,回顾时的错误为33%。访谈结果表明,错误发生在学生不认真计算、不学习公式、不能区分数列和级数时。学生在完成复利问题时也缺乏理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信